It's a lying troll.Unless "iberal" means "far right racists" you got it wrong. I'm thinking that 7th Moon was right about you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
It's a lying troll.Unless "iberal" means "far right racists" you got it wrong. I'm thinking that 7th Moon was right about you.
I agree Darwin himself was progressive for his time. But as for their being no logical basis for racism, Darwin himself was well aware of how racism is baked into his principles: "...No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man."No. In fact, Darwin outraged conservatives of his time by declaring that if one took "black savages" to England, in a few generations, they'd be just like Englishmen.
And later Darwinists showed that there was no logical basis for racism. This is why racism persisted so long in the U.S. where Darwin's discoveries were suppressed the most.
That's the point. His theory has nothing whatever to do with racism. In fact, evolutionary theory shows that human races don't exist as biological entities.I agree Darwin himself was progressive for his time. But as for their being no logical basis for racism, Darwin himself was well aware of how racism is baked into his principles: "...No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man."
To his credit he spoke of racism as "...an overwhelming evil." But he was honest enough to recognize the implicit racism in his principles.
We should call out racists. But did you actually mean to say he opposes evolutionary theory due to his racism??That's the point. His theory has nothing whatever to do with racism. In fact, evolutionary theory shows that human races don't exist as biological entities.
Darwin was merely observing that nature is not a good place to get one's morals or ethics. It's true that we are interfering with natural selection by helping people born with disabilities. But as Darwin said, to even let such people perish would be an "overwhelming evil."
This is why so many racists like ICR founder Henry Morris are opposed to evolutionary theory.
Yes. Morris believed that blacks are genetically inferior in intelligence and spirituality to white people. Evolutionary theory shows that such beliefs are wrong.We should call out racists. But did you actually mean to say he opposes evolutionary theory due to his racism??
Indeed and one of the most cherished government institutions of the wealthy liberal white privilege racists still holds dear to this day the core racist beliefs of the genetically inferior.Yes. Morris believed that blacks are genetically inferior in intelligence and spirituality to white people. Evolutionary theory shows that such beliefs are wrong.
Actually, Henry Morris was a conservative. His associate and co-founder of the ICR, William Tinkle, was a conservative and an enthusiastic eugenicist. Eventually he broke with the extreme conservative eugenicists over the Nazi racial purification ideology, but he retain his conservative stance on preventing "defective" people from reproducing. Planned Parenthood today, like many creationists, has turned away from the ultra-conservative views of its founders.Indeed and one of the most cherished government institutions of the wealthy liberal white privilege racists still holds dear to this day the core racist beliefs of the genetically inferior.
Planned Parenthood today, like many creationists, has turned away from the ultra-conservative views of its founder
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Morris's reason for opposing Darwin's theory was not due to Morris's own racism. He said he opposed evolutionism because it's "...satanic and responsible for racism, abortion, and a decline in morality."Actually, Henry Morris was a conservative. His associate and co-founder of the ICR, William Tinkle, was a conservative and an enthusiastic eugenicist. Eventually he broke with the extreme conservative eugenicists over the Nazi racial purification ideology, but he retain his conservative stance on preventing "defective" people from reproducing. Planned Parenthood today, like many creationists, has turned away from the ultra-conservative views of its founders.
Morris is just as wrong as Darwin for believing blacks were inferior to white people.Yes. Morris believed that blacks are genetically inferior in intelligence and spirituality to white people. Evolutionary theory shows that such beliefs are wrong.
Actually, Darwin thought that Englishmen were superior to other white people, too. He thought it was cultural. This is why he said that if "savages" were brought to England, they'd be just like Englishmen in a few generations. He was right. Creationists were wrong.Morris is just as wrong as Darwin for believing blacks were inferior to white people.
It's genetics that shows evolutionary theory to be correct, just as plate tectonics showed "continental drift" is correct. Darwin inferred evolution, even though he couldn't explain how a new trait could persist and not be swamped by other traits. He inferred humans were essentially the same, citing a black man who taught him a great deal about natural history. He just didn't have an explanation for these things. Genetics gave us that.It's actually genetics, not evolutionary theory, that shows such beliefs are wrong.
There have been 40 million white babies aborted since Roe v. Wade. If abortion is racist, it's because it assumes whites are subhuman.National Statistics
More than 20 million Black babies have been aborted since the 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized abortion in our country.
Yes, the Backwards, middle ages, knuckle dragging, non-scientific belief among the white privilege liberal extremists that the unborn of all races are sub-human definitely applies in their progression from the paramount " Negro Program" to their willingness to commit genocide on the young boys and girls of all colors.There have been 40 million white babies aborted since Roe v. Wade. If abortion is racist, it's because it assumes whites are subhuman.
Darwin had quite the white supremist views I see. But saying it's cultural sweeps a lot of his racism under the rug. He cited racial inequality as evidence for his theory. So it isn't cultural, it's foundational to his theory. Where did Darwin say they'd be just like Englishmen? Because Darwin also said “the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world.”Actually, Darwin thought that Englishmen were superior to other white people, too. He thought it was cultural. This is why he said that if "savages" were brought to England, they'd be just like Englishmen in a few generations. He was right. Creationists were wrong.
The claim was evolutionary theory showed us races are a social construct. Genetics did that. The theory of evolution showed us this about race : "And this was especially the case, because the slaves belonged in general to a race different from that of their masters." Is there anything Darwin was wrong about?It's genetics that shows evolutionary theory to be correct, just as plate tectonics showed "continental drift" is correct. Darwin inferred evolution, even though he couldn't explain how a new trait could persist and not be swamped by other traits. He inferred humans were essentially the same, citing a black man who taught him a great deal about natural history. He just didn't have an explanation for these things. Genetics gave us that.
Sanger strove to create a race of thoroughbreds? I can't image where she got her ideas from."Sanger believed she had found the solution to Stoddard’s “Crisis of the Ages” in birth control. In a 1919 article, she appealed to eugenicists to lend their support to birth control as the vehicle for “racial betterment.” Sanger’s objective was to eliminate the “unfit,” while striving to “Create a Race of Thoroughbreds,” which was the tagline for her magazine The Birth Control Review."
There have been 40 million white babies aborted since Roe v. Wade. If abortion is racist, it's because it assumes whites are subhuman.National Statistics
More than 20 million Black babies have been aborted since the 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized abortion in our country.
He was anti-slavery, argued that blacks were entitled to freedom and the right to their own earnings, and insisted that they would adjust to England enough to be like Englishmen in a few generations.Darwin had quite the white supremist views I see.
I see you edited the statement to make it look like he agrees with creationists. But the part you hid from us shows otherwise...Sanger strove to create a race of thoroughbreds? I can't image where she got her ideas from.
"
will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man.” -DarwinThus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals
"but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed." -also Darwin