What's new
By:
Filters
Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pelosi just got Re-elected

R

reba

Member
Pelosi just got Re-elected

I don’t watch the news if I can help it
When I do, I feel my blood pressure soar
What’s right is wrong and what’s wrong is right
I just don’t get it no more
The world has become such a shambles
The truth is being rejected
Leave it to fate; I’m afraid it’s too late
Pelosi just got re-elected

Oh, Pelosi just got re-elected
For two more long years
This isn’t a happy occasion
I can’t hide any more tears
Liberalism must be a sickness
Seems like they’re all infected
No matter what gets done, I’ll cling to God and my guns
Pelosi just got re-elected

Am I wrong cause I married a woman?
Am I bad cause I go to church?
I’m not fond of the UN or NATO
I believe that America comes first
Like most folks I work hard for my money
But the tax man wants more collected
I guess that’s okay, it don’t matter anyway
Pelosi just got re-elected

Oh, Pelosi just got re-elected
For two more long years
This isn’t a happy occasion
I can’t hide any more tears
Liberalism must be a sickness
Seems like they’re all infected
No matter what gets done, I’ll cling to God and my guns
Pelosi just got re-elected

What ever happened to the Golden State?
How did we get in this mess?
We have an abundance of natural resources
It’s a sin to use them I guess
Special Interest has taken over
Things we need now are protected
I’m getting ready to cry, I’d rather just die
Pelosi just got re-elected

Oh, Pelosi just got re-elected
For two more long years
This isn’t a happy occasion
I can’t hide any more tears
Liberalism must be a sickness
Seems like they’re all infected
No matter what gets done, I’ll cling to God and my guns
Pelosi just got re-elected

I believe that our great Constitution
Limits governmental control
The power of the vote can change things
Pull us right out of the whole
The electorate just can’t seem to do that
They're stupid and can’t be respected
Without any brains, they’ve all gone insane
Pelosi just got re-elected

Oh, Pelosi just got re-elected
For two more long years
This isn’t a happy occasion
I can’t hide any more tears
Liberalism must be a sickness
Seems like they’re all infected
No matter what gets done, I’ll cling to God and my guns
Pelosi just got re-elected
 
Does Nancy’s success make us wonder why God put her there?
Rom 13:1 For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Daniel 4:17 . . the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. Of course Nancy is a woman, and her power might be an error huh? :)
 
well I have saw a few days ago one of the councilmembers whom would have me on the street so that she could make few more dollars. she doesn't mind denying full time city employees benefits while at the same time enjoying those same things. she is a millionaire. she doesn't know me but I know her face. I had to repent of some evil thoughts.
 
Genesis Owl said:
Well that's about as useful for our better future as are nipples on a boar hog. :wall

Nobody saw Boener's announcement of a lawsuit against Obama as a political tool to insure his re-election did they? Hey John? What are the grounds for that suit? "I'll get back to ya!"
Yeah, we see that John. I know you'll have more details so as to go forth now. Right John?
John? John! :poke
Nancy Pelosi re-elected to lead House Democrats, John Boener voted to be next speaker unanimously
Click to expand...


The House leadership has grounds for a lawsuit but may not have standing. The better option is to use the Constitutional powers already available to them; cut off funding. Cut off funding drastically, to strategic executive functions, beginning with the White House, Department of Justice, and IRS.

Since Obama insists on creating a Constitutional crisis by misusing executive power and daring anyone to respond, then give him that crisis in spades. He has to be stopped.


"The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch. This Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration. There is two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress. One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction." - Jonathan Turley,George Washington University Law Professor
 
Mike S said:
The House leadership has grounds for a lawsuit but may not have standing. The better option is to use the Constitutional powers already available to them; cut off funding. Cut off funding drastically, to strategic executive functions, beginning with the White House, Department of Justice, and IRS.

Since Obama insists on creating a Constitutional crisis by misusing executive power and daring anyone to respond, then give him that crisis in spades. He has to be stopped.


"The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch. This Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration. There is two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress. One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction." - Jonathan Turley,George Washington University Law Professor
Click to expand...
utter confusion so if a state allows medical mj and the doj doesn't then what? what if the supreme court rules on way or the other then what if the opposide side wants it legal or illegal?
 
Well, in fairness, he hasn't authored as many EO's as did Bush Jr. And thus far it is all within the letter of the law as relates to issuance of those EO's.

And when the Republicans in both houses, and certainly John Boehner now, refused to work with Obama from the very start of his term in office, I can see why Obama would act of his own accord. Rather than continue to try to reason with the unreasonable men and women of the GOP.

That being said, he's proving in this second term, where he has nothing to prove so as to be re-elected, that he's an enemy of America.

And in as much as he's currently allowing us to be invaded at our southern border, while even refusing to visit the problem he's helping to perpetuate, his actions may have a secondary design behind them.

If he creates a national crisis while still in office, supposedly, and I've heard this but haven't yet invested time to research it for myself, he can declare martial law due to that crisis. Since 1933 America has been in a state of national emergency.
Which means that during a declared state of martial law the sitting President can sit for as long as martial law is sustained.

I think that's what he's up to.

If Boehner, who was foolish in making his law suit declaration at a news conference, and just in time for this latest election, so as to state he's going to bring a suit against Obama, but has no idea what the charges are going to be at the time he makes that statement, ( Media Question: What specific executive action are you planning to challenge in court? Boehner: "When I make that decision I'll let you know.") is serious, he better dance or get off the floor.


Because at this point, he's not helping remedy the Obama problem. He simply demonstrated he was intent on feathering his own nest to insure he was re-elected by an electorate who he led to believe needed him there to finish what he started. Which in truth, was nothing but hot air and the most grandiose of empty campaign promises.That he's going to sue Obama!
Even Obama taunted JB about that one.

He didn't campaign the entire time he should have so as to insure re-election. All he had to do was call that news conference just before the election, make that the threat that even Obama dismissed, and he was in.

The conflict generated between him, the GOP, the Liberals and Obama, keeps them all in business.

It's smoke and mirrors and collaborators on both sides of the aisle here. "Cui bono?" Who benefits?

Remember Lois Lerner? She's been held in contempt of Congress for targeting conservative non-profit groups using her authority at the IRS. Ewwww, contempt! Sounds serious! Sounds! Serious. But isn't.
Where's she at today? In a jail cell? Nooooo. She's ollecting her pay and benefits and living larger than you or I shall in a lifetime.
You or I would be in cuffs and off to jail were we held in contempt in a court of law.
Who's in charge of prosecuting her? Obama's man, Eric Holder, the attorney general. Who just loves the Republicans! Or, Congress! Due to a provision in the constitution that would allow them, who declared her in contempt, to take her into custody.
In the history of America since that provision was inked, it has never been executed. And Boehner, when pressed, passes the buck, as HML, to Holder. When we can presume Lerner acted at Obama's behest? Now his boy in the AG office is going to nail her to a wall for it?


Mike S said:
The House leadership has grounds for a lawsuit but may not have standing. The better option is to use the Constitutional powers already available to them; cut off funding. Cut off funding drastically, to strategic executive functions, beginning with the White House, Department of Justice, and IRS.

Since Obama insists on creating a Constitutional crisis by misusing executive power and daring anyone to respond, then give him that crisis in spades. He has to be stopped.


"The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch. This Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration. There is two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress. One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction." - Jonathan Turley,George Washington University Law Professor
Click to expand...
 
today the congress votes to withdrawal California from the union and seals the border with her and jam the airwaves. rand paul says the we must do this as liberalism is a disease.
 
Genesis Owl said:
Well, in fairness, he hasn't authored as many EO's as did Bush Jr. And thus far it is all within the letter of the law as relates to issuance of those EO's.
Click to expand...

Where do you get that idea? During Obama's 6 years in office the Supreme Court has handed down 20 unanimous decisions striking down his abuse of power (including executive orders), far more than any predecessor.
 
Mike S said:
Where do you get that idea?
Click to expand...
Certainly not from what can be called partisan bias websites.


FactCheck.Org
Obama and Executive Overreach
(Sic)"....Presidential Authority Rebuked?

Goodlatte made the claim that the Supreme Court’s “9-0 decision last week was the 13th time the Supreme Court has voted 9-0 that the president has exceeded his constitutional authority.” That’s a stretch, at best.
 
No ego on my part. This is for fun. With a smattering of real talk included. But not at my initiation it must be noted.

Note to self. That is right self, right? *looks around* :shades


jasonc said:
today the congress votes to withdrawal California from the union and seals the border with her and jam the airwaves. rand paul says the we must do this as liberalism is a disease.
Click to expand...
:lol That sounds like something Paul would put on the record if this wasn't just a joke.

That's not to say that California didn't have its own people who had ideas sorta along those lines. Had, being the keyword here. Phew, missed having a 51st state by just that much. :idea Well, sure Congress would have had to approve it but that's just that minor detail that no longer applies.

State of Jefferson: 2 of 3 Northern California secession measures defeated
 
I have myriads of reason why I know that big government doesn't work. the va has always been that way.

florida succeeds from the union to form the conch&banana republic. where pot and gay marriage are legal and no one works. the state of California will send aid to those here in florida but they haven't decided how to pay for the aid.so florida will tax the latinos to death.:couch
 
Last edited:
Genesis Owl said:
No ego on my part. This is for fun. With a smattering of real talk included. But not at my initiation it must be noted.

Note to self. That is right self, right? *looks around* :shades


:lol That sounds like something Paul would put on the record if this wasn't just a joke.

That's not to say that California didn't have its own people who had ideas sorta along those lines. Had, being the keyword here. Phew, missed having a 51st state by just that much. :idea Well, sure Congress would have had to approve it but that's just that minor detail that no longer applies.

State of Jefferson: 2 of 3 Northern California secession measures defeated
Click to expand...

Ok maybe i am just being an over sensitive female :halo ... I did not post this in CE&P to avoid this stuff but the poem its self brings it on.... :biggrin2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top