I guess my point is that in a healthy vibrant church, the pastor is not the one who does all the work. We share his load.
I agree and appreciate your passion for your home church. If everyone felt that way we could accomplish even more towards the Great Commission.
I too am familiar with the cell-church concept. Yet even in that model there exists a
combined worship service where everyone gathers at one time or another aside from their cell-group, home-church meetings.
However, the point of this thread is not to give props to our church (and there’s nothing wrong with that!). Perhaps, we can start another thread,
“WHAT I LIKE ABOUT CHURCH†(Hmmmm, not a bad idea! Anybody want to start it?) and take it from there.
Rather the intent was to give a platform to those (cell members included) who have ideas yet say nothing at all; ideas worth pondering for those in a position to make changes (yes, even in a cell-based church there are people who hold these positions of authority).
Would I be far off the mark (based on your reply) to say one area worth (further) concentrating on (and this is to take nothing away from all the good that happens) is the
"new believers who fall away because the enemy tries to steal their faith?" Or maybe the minority
"pew warmers who like the status quo?" Not just your church but the Church as a whole. Maybe not. Things may be are perfect as they are, no changes necessary.
Again, this thread is meant to produce further effectiveness in how we conduct ’church’. Sometimes it’s fruitful to hear the other side.
Be blessed, Stay blessed!