Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Poisening the Populace - Chemtrails, Medication and Modified Foods

OK: Off topic? NO WAY, just another way to look at DANGER! I agree that the title is correct! [AND WITH MODIFIED FOODS.] But what do we hear about being POISENED by the clergy and + ones, is the question?? And what business is it of you judging me in a post like.. Re: Poisening the Populace - Chemtrails and Modified Foods are many 'Christian' ones thoughts!?

Surely most can see that I agree that the Christian is to have a spiritual brain! Yet, when God says something at the start of His Word ( Heb. 13:8-9) & then we have more truth come on the scene at a later date that confuses the lot, who is to be believed? In bottom line I ask why not just ask the Lords 'blessing on the title' (meaning) and then drink it or eat it as these Christians ones teach this of Pauls pen??

Rom. 14
[11] For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
[12] So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
[13] Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.
[14] I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.

(has Paul just done away with the Lords CONDITIONAL Words from the start of it! No, he has NEVER EATEN ANYTHING UNCLEAN, and was talking of ONLY ALLOWED FOODS & DRINKS)

[15] But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died.
[16] Let not then your good be evil spoken of:
[17] For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
[18] For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men.
[19] Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.

[20] For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.
[21] It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.

[22] Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
[23] And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

So: In BOTTOM/LINE TRUTH, when this is taught for truth as has been done for many moon, what harm is there in a little POISEN? Early death, High blood presure, Obesity, Diabetes, heart & on & on it goes.

--Elijah
 
Feminizing of America

Pre-Mature Development

In our human society us baby boomers (age 46-66) witness females developing their breasts from 16 to 22. Yet today we see young girls starting their periods as young as 7 or 8, by 9 or 10 their breasts are starting to develop and by 12 and 13 these girls have fully developed breasts. Of course no one is talking about the boys. What do you think would happen if the environment and the food that these children are eating had too much female estrogen?

You would expect the girls to develop prematurely and you would expect the boys to be underdeveloped. So is the case. What we see is a sudden heightened of fat, flabby, "man boobs", and "micro-penises".

Even ones sexual preferences are being altered. Homosexuality has existed since the beginning of time; however, we certainly have seen a massive escalation. Particularly with women entering their 40's one suddenly sees a heterosexual female turning into a lesbian.

Xenoestrogens

"Xeno" means foreign. Exists in the external environment and these rare sometimes referred to as "estrogen mimics and endocrine disrupters". It is important to realize that xenoestrogens are cumulative over a lifetime and the smallest amount can trigger the hormone receptors in the liver to start reproducing live cysts. Xenoestrogens can signal the body to produce sometimes 10-times the normal amount of estrogen.

Researchers worldwide have observed fish in our lakes, rivers, and oceans that are actually switching gender due to the high levels of effluent estrogen. While the mainstream media has just began to recognize this "new" news, experts have been discussing this pharmaceutical problem for 25 years and they have known about "gender-bent" fish for more than 10 years!

It is surmised that excess levels of steroids probably cause these changes; largely secreted by humans using birth control pills and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Other primary sources of female estrogen contamination come from "dietary estrogen" and are a diverse group of naturally occurring plant compounds that because of their structural similarity with female estrogen have the ability to cause estrogenic and /or anti-estrogenic effects. The similarities, at the molecular level of estrogens and phytoestrogen, allows phytoestrogen to mildly mimic and sometimes act as antagonists to estrogen.


Go Beyond Organic - Feminizing of America Part I | Weekly News Tips

That's not how it works strangelove Fish have a fundamentally different mechanism of sexual determination.

All human babies due to us begin vivipary animals give birth to live young all children male or female are exposed to large doses of female hormones while a fetus inside the mother.

Galactorrhea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newborns male or female often lactate themselves for a few days after birth due to this effect.
It dose NOT cause micro-penis.
Estrogen dose NOT cause homosexual behavior.

Gender specific differences are determined by the presence of Testosterone inside the mother, not estrogen there are many studies out there if you want to see them.
Sexual Hormones and the Brain: An Essential Alliance for Sexual Identity and Sexual Orientation

Just one.

Xenoestrogens can be harmful in large doses it's not entirely clear what specifically acts as a Xenoestrogen it's not always in the food.

I'm in a unique position to tell you what estrogen dose as I've been exposed to massive doses of female hormones to change me from my male appearance into a female one.
Thus I can tell you from personal experience what it dose to sex urges.

It weakens your sexual libido and your not as sexually driven as you were before and doses of female hormones DO effect your fertility profoundly and extremely rapidly,
ie: I was infertile in a week, irreversibly sterile in 6 months with great amounts of atrophy. Whitch is a much more realistic concern for those who get large doses of Xenoestrogens that there sperm counts might be effected.

However if your into girls before your body will change but your sex drive will not... And you will end up a lesbian. Likewise a Homosexual man will be turned into a heterosexual woman.

Earlier pubertal in females are due to the fact that fat produces excess estrogen and triggers pubertal prematurely likewise you don't develop properly if you starve yourself.
 
Xenoestrogens can be harmful in large doses it's not entirely clear what specifically acts as a Xenoestrogen it's not always in the food.

I'm in a unique position to tell you what estrogen dose as I've been exposed to massive doses of female hormones to change me from my male appearance into a female one.
Thus I can tell you from personal experience what it dose to sex urges.

It weakens your sexual libido and your not as sexually driven as you were before and doses of female hormones DO effect your fertility profoundly and extremely rapidly,
ie: I was infertile in a week, irreversibly sterile in 6 months with great amounts of atrophy. Whitch is a much more realistic concern for those who get large doses of Xenoestrogens that there sperm counts might be effected.

However if your into girls before your body will change but your sex drive will not... And you will end up a lesbian. Likewise a Homosexual man will be turned into a heterosexual woman.

Earlier pubertal in females are due to the fact that fat produces excess estrogen and triggers pubertal prematurely likewise you don't develop properly if you starve yourself.

There we go. Estrogen feminizes. Straight from the horses mouth.

Thanks Pebbles.

Yeah...you need high direct doses to instantly change you from a male to a female...but....do we really want ANY larger than average amounts in our food and water? It's certainly possible that it has a range of subtle effects on sexuality.

Theres some info on things you can eat that will lessen the effect of estrogen on your body in the link I posted///// for anyone thats interested. Maybe not you Pebbles...;)....no doubt your thrilled with all this.
 
Theres some info on things you can eat that will lessen the effect of estrogen on your body in the link I posted///// for anyone thats interested. Maybe not you Pebbles...;)....no doubt your thrilled with all this.
Not thrilled you misunderstand me... Unless you have Gender Dysphora that's reached an acute stage and your about to kill yourself I don't recommend changing your gender... transition is like swallowing an ocean of pain. Both physical and emotional.
You choose it only because your choice is... Be a transsexual... or die.

I was aware of phytoestrogens and I intentionally tried to expose myself to them prior to transitioning mostly in the form of consuming a huge amount of Soy bean paste. Nothing happened I remained completely male anatomically and my fertility wasn't impaired either but studies beyond my personal experience show that Phyto-Xenoestrogens can impair fertility.

Estrogen doesn't make men into homosexuals which is what your implying.
The dosages required to induce feminizing changes in humans like those your describing would have to be so enormous much more than Xenoestrogens could do.

However... an increase in childhood Obesity possibly could.
 
Estrogen doesn't make men into homosexuals which is what your implying.
The dosages required to induce feminizing changes in humans like those your describing would have to be so enormous much more than Xenoestrogens could do.

I'm implying that it could be making men more effeminate. It's a general term.
 
Genetically modified food is not innately dangerous people have been eating that food for a very long time now depending on the modifications made it could have incredible benefits to humankind and in reality is the only solution to the growing human population.

My friend, when God made everything, which includes the food we eat He said it was very good. Now imperfect man thinks he can improve on what God said was good. What I call that is arrogance.....the imperfect thinks he can do better than what the perfect God did.
.
 
My friend, when God made everything, which includes the food we eat He said it was very good. Now imperfect man thinks he can improve on what God said was good. What I call that is arrogance.....the imperfect thinks he can do better than what the perfect God did.
.

the good lord saw fit to allow the indians to die from corn that rust and is suspectible to disease.
uh plants undergo micro evolution and that person who "cured" that rust bred them with the defective corn and the indians have food.

now i am not saying God did that but he is allowing death to do this to everything, so we shouldnt find cures?

and fyi i'm not a fan of genetic modified foods, but to say that we men havent modified our food sources yrs is simply false.

most bananas could at one time produce seeds and actually mate now they are asexually reproductive.
 
My friend, when God made everything, which includes the food we eat He said it was very good. Now imperfect man thinks he can improve on what God said was good. What I call that is arrogance.....the imperfect thinks he can do better than what the perfect God did.
.
Let me go through how we genetically modify plants

There is a Bactria that lives in the soil, agrobacterium tumefaciens This is an infectious plant disease it causes "Crown gall disease"

which is specifically a strange nasty cancerous growth to grow all over the plant it infects eventually compromising it's structural integrity and kills it.
View attachment 1761

Even once you've killed the bacteria once established the cancer will continue on the plant.
Analysis of the nature of these transformed cancerous plant cells showed that the Bactria had infected the cells and integrated chunks of it's own genome into the plant, These bacterial genes are specifically designed to encourage growth of the infectious plant cells to give them more substrate on which to grow.

View attachment 1762

The Bactria grow on the surface of the plant cell they are very much alive they aren't a virus and this is unusual behavior which might confuse you.

It was discovered that it has a mechanism that determines what chunks of DNA to fuse with it's plant cell. Genetic modification of Bactria happens all the time. It's nature they pass around plasmids of genetic material it's a well known natural process. So modifying the agrobactira was easy as they dose so naturally.

Doing so you can remove the cancer causing genes and replace them with genetic material from any source you can then infect a plant... It won't cause tumors take a tissue biopsy then using naturally occurring plant hormones induce the altered tissue to grow into a whole new plant possessing whatever gene you wanted it to possess.

Were using other naturally occurring species to inflict the changes. Did not your god create the bactira... The plant and the DNA we use?
Were merely using an otherwise useless plant plague for a useful purpose.

Even by your own biblical standards were humans not granted dominion of these matters... Horizontal gene transfer (DNA from one species getting into another) occurs in nature everywhere we are merely controlling this process and putting it to humanitarian ends such as offering solutions to world hunger and human suffering whereas the bible as far as I can tell offers none.
 
the good lord saw fit to allow the indians to die from corn that rust and is suspectible to disease.
uh plants undergo micro evolution and that person who "cured" that rust bred them with the defective corn and the indians have food.

now i am not saying God did that but he is allowing death to do this to everything, so we shouldnt find cures?

and fyi i'm not a fan of genetic modified foods, but to say that we men havent modified our food sources yrs is simply false.

most bananas could at one time produce seeds and actually mate now they are asexually reproductive.



Let me go through how we genetically modify plants

There is a Bactria that lives in the soil, agrobacterium tumefaciens This is an infectious plant disease it causes "Crown gall disease"

which is specifically a strange nasty cancerous growth to grow all over the plant it infects eventually compromising it's structural integrity and kills it.
View attachment 1761

Even once you've killed the bacteria once established the cancer will continue on the plant.
Analysis of the nature of these transformed cancerous plant cells showed that the Bactria had infected the cells and integrated chunks of it's own genome into the plant, These bacterial genes are specifically designed to encourage growth of the infectious plant cells to give them more substrate on which to grow.

View attachment 1762

The Bactria grow on the surface of the plant cell they are very much alive they aren't a virus and this is unusual behavior which might confuse you.

It was discovered that it has a mechanism that determines what chunks of DNA to fuse with it's plant cell. Genetic modification of Bactria happens all the time. It's nature they pass around plasmids of genetic material it's a well known natural process. So modifying the agrobactira was easy as they dose so naturally.

Doing so you can remove the cancer causing genes and replace them with genetic material from any source you can then infect a plant... It won't cause tumors take a tissue biopsy then using naturally occurring plant hormones induce the altered tissue to grow into a whole new plant possessing whatever gene you wanted it to possess.

Were using other naturally occurring species to inflict the changes. Did not your god create the bactira... The plant and the DNA we use?
Were merely using an otherwise useless plant plague for a useful purpose.

Even by your own biblical standards were humans not granted dominion of these matters... Horizontal gene transfer (DNA from one species getting into another) occurs in nature everywhere we are merely controlling this process and putting it to humanitarian ends such as offering solutions to world hunger and human suffering whereas the bible as far as I can tell offers none.

The question one should ask is how what God has made very good gotten to the state where plants and man have become infected and infested with diseases? Could it have something to do with a human beings are doing to the environment? You know sin has consequences not only on mankind itself but even on the environment as well.

We don't know the full ramification of altering a plant and an animal's genetic makeup. How often have we heard so called experts telling us that what they are doing is harmless, only to find out decades later that is was not what they thought? The more we think we are solving a problem we often times end up creating new sets of problems.<O:p</O:p
 
The question one should ask is how what God has made very good gotten to the state where plants and man have become infected and infested with diseases? Could it have something to do with a human beings are doing to the environment? You know sin has consequences not only on mankind itself but even on the environment as well.

We don't know the full ramification of altering a plant and an animal's genetic makeup. How often have we heard so called experts telling us that what they are doing is harmless, only to find out decades later that is was not what they thought? The more we think we are solving a problem we often times end up creating new sets of problems.<O:p</O:p

against modern medicine?

uh that famine in india wasnt caused by men at all but by men simply growing corn in india and a certian bacteria naturally attacking that plant.

God last time i checked allows sin and sickness.

theres nothing in the bible that says we cant try to cure disease and make stronger plants.

nothing.

our own bodies do that. if we get sick we adapt we learn what the virus was and adjust our defenses.

am i for gmf no but to say that we have done that over the eons and is wrong

we cant go back to the garden and undo all that we eat

the first pure foods dead.

the earth as a whole is under a curse. it will be until the lord returns

show me a verse that says men arent to attempt to help another with science.

oh yeah there not one verse.

what nothing on science.
i hope you dont think like these following statements.
toothpaste is an attempt to undue what God allows.

fluoride inst meant to be used for that.

nor is well washing as that kills bacteria.
 
The question one should ask is how what God has made very good gotten to the state where plants and man have become infected and infested with diseases? Could it have something to do with a human beings are doing to the environment? You know sin has consequences not only on mankind itself but even on the environment as well.

We don't know the full ramification of altering a plant and an animal's genetic makeup. How often have we heard so called experts telling us that what they are doing is harmless, only to find out decades later that is was not what they thought? The more we think we are solving a problem we often times end up creating new sets of problems.<O:p</O:p

That's not even a real excuse you could make that arguement with any technology why have the internet when god gave you vocal chords it could have unknown implications like driving pepole crazy!... just read another book beyond the bible for once just to know the world you live in. Bactria are absolutely everywhere. Most of these are good bactria they are symbionts they keep us alive and drive the functions of the planet however some are adapted to living in other organisms in such as way as to cause disease. It's not pollution that causes this illness.

You just have to look at the RECENT historical record to see that it wasn't "Oh the good old days when pepole repented for there sin when the evil gays and muslims were hung, all scentists were godly, and you said prayer in school." It's was nasty disease was everywhere starvation was rife and it killed nearly all your kids and your wife before there second year of life and you should have been arranging your funeral by your 29th birthday. it's no wounder the human population was so low before the 1940's.

http://images.quickblogcast.com/80618-70584/Life_Span_Chart21.jpg

just look at how most pepole were dying in the 1900's
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lead1900_98.pdf
Tuberculosis
Penuomina
Dysentry
Syphilis

and before that in your idealized time in the 1600's when religion ruled the world gays were slain pepole repented for there sins and muslims were slaughtered and the few scientists were monks... Were pepole spared from disease because of there "sin" no bubonic plauge that killed everyone 20%total population of europe and there kids too before there 30's killed indiscriminatly.

Technological and social advancement took us away from that there might be one or two bad reactions but that's why you gotta keep up the work so you can spot those things and do somthing about them before the situation returns to how it once was.
 
That's not even a real excuse you could make that arguement with any technology why have the internet when god gave you vocal chords it could have unknown implications like driving pepole crazy!... just read another book beyond the bible for once just to know the world you live in.

Well everything that man has made does have negative consequences, but in the vast majority of time we are not told because it is not in the interest of those that promotes it or benefits from it. And it was God's intention for human beings to communicate with each other face to face in person. We have people who don't even know the person living next to them but they are conversing with people all over the world, who most likely they will never meet in person. Our world has things upside down.
<O:p</O:p
One of the problems of reading and believing what people write in books is that they can mislead you into believing an invention or technology will make the world a better place. We have more technology today than ever before but we are more sickly, suffer more stress, more oppressed and less at peace with each other and environment that in the time when horse and wagon or by camel was the way to travel on land.<O:p</O:p

Bactria are absolutely everywhere. Most of these are good bactria they are symbionts they keep us alive and drive the functions of the planet however some are adapted to living in other organisms in such as way as to cause disease.

Bacteria is not an invention of man. God has made human beings with some ability to defend themselves against some of these, and with the right diet one can live a very healthy and long life dispite bacteria or even viorus.

It's not pollution that causes this illness.

You have no idea what you are saying here. I would suggest that you do some research online, and you will see how the polluting of our food, water, air and soil can and has caused many illnesses.<O:p</O:p

You just have to look at the RECENT historical record to see that it wasn't "Oh the good old days when pepole repented for there sin when the evil gays and muslims were hung, all scentists were godly, and you said prayer in school." It's was nasty disease was everywhere starvation was rife and it killed nearly all your kids and your wife before there second year of life and you should have been arranging your funeral by your 29th birthday. it's no wounder the human population was so low before the 1940's.

http://images.quickblogcast.com/80618-70584/Life_Span_Chart21.jpg

just look at how most pepole were dying in the 1900's
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lead1900_98.pdf
Tuberculosis
Penuomina
Dysentry
Syphilis

and before that in your idealized time in the 1600's when religion ruled the world gays were slain pepole repented for there sins and muslims were slaughtered and the few scientists were monks... Were pepole spared from disease because of there "sin" no bubonic plauge that killed everyone 20%total population of europe and there kids too before there 30's killed indiscriminatly.

Technological and social advancement took us away from that there might be one or two bad reactions but that's why you gotta keep up the work so you can spot those things and do somthing about them before the situation returns to how it once was.


It all depends on how far back one is looking and what part of the world. Despite our so-call progress our lifespan is a fraction in comparison to the average age of people that have lived in the time of the prophets and those before them. You are like a person that was born into a certain way of life that is destructive, but believes that it is the only way to live and you know nothing else, because you have been deceived. And I never said that the past was perfect, but I am not one of those that buy into this false idea that technology and inventions automatically makes things better.<O:p</O:p
 
simple. my grandpa
born in the early 1900's to a family of nine. three died by 2.

he had diptheria, nearly died at nine

anyone lately have measles?


bazz what of the CURSE.The earth after the fall is dying.If you doubt that,even without men interfering species have died out.

we bred animals to hunt that werent ever meant to hunt certain animals.

the breed of dog called dachsund is for the hunting of badgers.

and what of the naturally occuring mercury toxicity of fish in the ocean.
and also the streams

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=one-in-four-fish-contaminated-with-mercury

interesting methylmercury rain.

i wonder how much we actually contribute to that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
simple. my grandpa
born in the early 1900's to a family of nine. three died by 2.

he had diptheria, nearly died at nine

anyone lately have measles?


bazz what of the CURSE.The earth after the fall is dying.If you doubt that,even without men interfering species have died out.

we bred animals to hunt that werent ever meant to hunt certain animals.

the breed of dog called dachsund is for the hunting of badgers.

and what of the naturally occuring mercury toxicity of fish in the ocean.
and also the streams

One in Four Fish in U.S. Waterways Contaminated with Unsafe Levels of Mercury: Scientific American

interesting methylmercury rain.

i wonder how much we actually contribute to that.


Mankind of course has caused much of the destruction to our environment (how many inventions of man can we say does not have negative consiquencies? not many), but even where it happens apart from man that too is the result of sin. Man has brought a curse on itself, but when we think we can improve on what God had already made good and perfect all we are doing is creating more problems on top of the problems we have already created. Unlike some, I am not impressed with man's so-called progress and neither is God.<O:p</O:p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mankind of course has caused much of the destruction to our environment (how many inventions of man can we say does not have negative consiquencies? not many), but even where it happens apart from man that too is the result of sin. Man has brought a curse on itself, but when we think we can improve on what God had already made good and perfect all we are doing is creating more problems on top of the problems we have already created.<O:p</O:p

so your solution is..

to let cancer kill
to let populations starve

leprosy is curable with soap and water. that is the prevention for that. but that soap when dumped on the earth damages the natural balence

dog crap has been known to kill fish along with fertilzers for the citrus here.

simple dog poop. does that

God shorten men's lives. not men. he limited men's lives to about 80.

diet while is a prevention isnt a cure all.

of course everything we do has an affect

but to go the other extreme when in fact persons lived way shorter after the time of noah and not treat illness is also wrong.

how far back do you want to go.

you are on the internet so that cant be much. we need the tech for that. electricity evil as well.

like pork, give that up as it has a ton of parasites one eats the brian

when i was in afghanistan they had no tech,
they did die from malnutrition, malaria
and had several parasites

some of the malnutrtion is from the wars but the others is from bad water and untreated soils. and the mosquitoes.

quinine save lives but.it wont allows blood tranfusions for one yr.

and guess what its naturally Found! gin and tonic was the stuff that walter reed used to cure malaria.

lipitor used to treat cholesterol is found in fish naturally and is refined.
 
and what of the naturally occuring mercury toxicity of fish in the ocean.
and also the streams

One in Four Fish in U.S. Waterways Contaminated with Unsafe Levels of Mercury: Scientific American

interesting methylmercury rain.

i wonder how much we actually contribute to that.

Huh? Naturally occuring? Lolz....What on Earth are you talking about? :confused:

Did you actually read that article? It's all about how pollution (from mining they say) is causing mercury levels to rise in the waterways and in fishes! It's about pollution.

Lol...oh Jason.
 
when i was in afghanistan they had no tech,
they did die from malnutrition, malaria
and had several parasites

some of the malnutrtion is from the wars but the others is from bad water and untreated soils. and the mosquitoes.

Oh d'ya think!?

You're hysterical dude.
 
Huh? Naturally occuring? Lolz....What on Earth are you talking about? :confused:

Did you actually read that article? It's all about how pollution (from mining they say) is causing mercury levels to rise in the waterways and in fishes! It's about pollution.

Lol...oh Jason.

typical, did i say that we didnt pollute. i read the article men do cause some of that.

PLEASE. I know that we have some of that on US. but IN that article

This study shows just how widespread mercury pollution has become in our air, watersheds, and many of our fish in freshwater streams," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement. "This science sends a clear message that our country must continue to confront pollution, restore our nation's waterways, and protect the public from potential health dangers."

Atmospheric deposition of mercury is responsible for the contamination of MOST waterways, but that alone does not account for all of it, USGS noted. Wetlands, forests and organic soils can enhance the conversion of mercury to highly toxic methylmercury, which accumulates in the food chain and can cause serious public health problems


strangle love are you illerate?

i wonder.

what are your solutions?


i'm sick of these anti this or that.

want to do something about it? or just complain?

mercury btw is used in the laptops and pcs

its in batteries and also switches on some cars.

and is used for a lot of things.
 
well i want your solutions?

no more complaining

what are you doing to fix the evils of this world?

what is the solution for cancers that have been found and have nothing to do with the diets

and what is your solution to the droughts that have affected afghanistan far more then men's wars ever could and thier ignorance on sanitiation or also the lack of farming and irrigation knowledge.

and just sitting back and saying jesus doesnt cut it.

donate to those that try to solve the problem or go out and attempt yourself.
 
typical, did i say that we didnt pollute. i read the article men do cause some of that.

PLEASE. I know that we have some of that on US. but IN that article

This study shows just how widespread mercury pollution has become in our air, watersheds, and many of our fish in freshwater streams," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement. "This science sends a clear message that our country must continue to confront pollution, restore our nation's waterways, and protect the public from potential health dangers."

Atmospheric deposition of mercury is responsible for the contamination of MOST waterways, but that alone does not account for all of it, USGS noted. Wetlands, forests and organic soils can enhance the conversion of mercury to highly toxic methylmercury, which accumulates in the food chain and can cause serious public health problems

strangle love are you illerate?

Ya....the atmospheric deposition of mercury is due to HUMANS buddy! Unless you got significant VOLCANO activity going on in the USA recently??

And then the article goes onto to say:

Some of the highest levels of mercury in fish were found in "blackwater" streams in North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Louisiana, all of which have large, undeveloped, forested watersheds. Some high levels were also found in the western United States, which the scientists attributed to mining.

Funny that you call me illiterate. Do you ever read your own posts?
 
Back
Top