I sure hope and pray that he is in Heaven though and that he did know the Lord. Like Selah said, if he really was an unbeliever, why would he baptize his children?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
But Jesus also said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father except by me"If Jesus took away the sin of the world. That means there is no more transgression. Even sin was in the world before the law, the scripture says Jesus took away the sin of the world.
But Jesus also said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father except by me"
That precludes any alternative route to heaven.
Depends how it is taken. Jesus said no man comes to the Father except through me, because he is the one who took away the sin of the world.
I would add , through me, is worthy of considering there.Depends how it is taken. Jesus said no man comes to the Father except through me, because he is the one who took away the sin of the world.
people don't understand the gospel. If you were not versed in the Bible, and roman catholicism taught you that baptism saves, then you would do what you were told by the pope. But faith in Christ saves, not baptism or circumcision or any work of the flesh.I sure hope and pray that he is in Heaven though and that he did know the Lord. Like Selah said, if he really was an unbeliever, why would he baptize his children?
A school of thought in these discussions will sometimes retort with, that is universalism. A heresy.For God so loved the world, not, for God so loved a selected few.
That your saying is like the verse in Ephesians 1:4The accuser is Moses through the Law even sin was in the world before the Law, but Jesus took away the sin of the world, the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Everything was finished before it began. Christ always was. He delivered the Kingdom to God.
A school of thought in these discussions will sometimes retort with, that is universalism. A heresy.
I am not one of those. Just pointing this out.
baptism or circumcision does not save. Although baptism is good, it is for believer in Christ, as a confirmation of faith before other believers. That is all it does.I'm baptized in the Catholic church, and so is my brother and sister; our father is an athiest, but my mother is not.
Yes, I realize that. I was addressing people who were wondering how an athiest father could have baptized children. In my case I have a father who is athiest, but a mother who is Roman Catholic.baptism or circumcision does not save. Although baptism is good, it is for believer in Christ, as a confirmation of faith before other believers. That is all it does.
people don't understand the gospel. If you were not versed in the Bible, and roman catholicism taught you that baptism saves, then you would do what you were told by the pope. But faith in Christ saves, not baptism or circumcision or any work of the flesh.
that is part of the spiritual symbolism involved yes, but for all practical purposes it's just for confirmation of faith. Down with the old nature, and up with the newnature as sin is washed away. symbolically sin is washed away yes, but not literally.I believe being baptised in water is being baptised into death buried with Christ and baptised in the Law, then people have to be raised from that death. I would rather not go through that.