Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pre-existence of Jesus - Non trinitarian question

LittleNipper said:
gingercat said:
TanNinety said:
Thank you ginger for a very interesting quote.

But the same can also be translated:
For in Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created through him, and for him

The above rendering of the verse does not require Jesus to pre-exist except in the mind, plan and purpose of God.

Care to try the questions I have? I can't seem to find answers to those questions without sounding too trinitarianish. Can you, may be?

Glad to :D

He is the image of the invisible God the first born over all creation. Colossians 1:15

I don't know how you can interprete this verse other ways except Jesus is God's first creation.


HE is (meaning JESUS) the image of the invisible GOD the first born (meaning HE has PREEMINENCE above everything) over all creation.

Little Nipper,

I can see that the 'churches' have taught you well 'grasshopper'. The problem is that the churches are as confused as the individuals that 'created' them.

Let me offer you these:


ONLY GOD can create from nothing. CHRIST created form nothing

Now, could not an 'all powerful God bestow His power to that which He wills?
ONLY GOD can heal. CHRIST healed.

You obviously failed to mention that the apostles 'healed also'. And Beni Hindi, (he he he).

ONLY GOD can forgive sin. CHRIST both forgave sin and died that all through faith may be forgiven.

The Pope says that HE can forgive too. But seriously, once again, if God so wills it that His Son be able to forgive sin, who are you or I to question this?

ONLY GOD has control over the elements. CHRIST calmed the storm.

Once again, you question the power of God to bestow such with whom He wills. How about the 'walls of Jericho'? How about the day that had NO darkness? How about thumping a rock with a stick and bringing forth water in the dessert?

ONLY GOD can raise the dead back to life. CHRIST both brought the dead back to life and over came the grave HIMSELF.

Once again, you seem to have forgotten that the apostles TOO, raised the dead back to life.

Only GOD is to be worshipped. At the name of the LORD JESUS CHRIST every knee WILL one day bow and every tongue WILL one day confess that JESUS CHRIST IS the LORD.

Now, look at you, you are such a 'good' Sunday school student. But the truth is, we were NEVER told that we MUST ONLY worship God. We were told to ONLY worship God AS THE GOD. So, once again, you have allowed the churches limited understand cloud your own. Christ may CERTAINLY be worshiped as 'something OTHER THAN God Himself', for He IS the Son of God. So, to worship Him AS the Son takes absolutely NOTHING away from the Father.
 
Thank you guys for your answers. This definitely takes an interesting turn for me.
To keep the discussion in order may be I should clarify the terms because I’ve seen people get into miscommunication on other discussion forums about this. I don’t really care if I got these definitions right but for the sake of this discussion I am going to presume such that soul is cognitive awareness, spirit is the life from God, flesh is an earthly body.

I have always pictured man as spirit + flesh which resulted in the by product of soul which by itself did not pre-exist. So what you are saying is that Christ was the first soul and we were later created after Him as souls.

Now Georges, I infer from your post that Christ was the same kind of soul as the soul of a man. Now you said Christ knew He was special and did not need this “soul training†on earth. He did not lose His pre-knowledge of that time that He spent with God. What is wrong with our souls? If we share the same kind of souls with Christ (before His death and resurrection) why do we not retain this same soulish knowledge of our souls pre-existence? Were our souls held in heavenly amniotic fluid? The reason I choose that is because, I do not have recollection of any of the 9 months I spent in my mothers womb even though you would concur that I had a soul (cognitive awareness). Or does our soul when it is brought by the angels into the fetus somehow go through a sort of memory wipe before the angels leave (men in black style)? If so, why did Jesus not go through this memory wipe?

What criteria does God have in choosing the souls at birth? First come first serve? ..â€Âhey there is a mother to be, quick get me a soul from the storage room?†Or does God choose your parents to put the soul in? ..If so, what reasons does God have to place/plan/plant a soul in the flesh of a baby that is being born of rape/molestation/deformation?

Did God pre plan a soul for test tube babies as well?

Apart from being jewish tradition is there any scriptural proof in the OT for the above?

I will rest these questions for now.
 
To the trinitarians, if I needed some proof texts to prove myself the trinity I really have a long list of those with me. As it is, there are a lot of other trinity debates on this apologetics forum and I really do not intend to drive this discussion that way. What I ask is a little bit of a courtesy so that this(me) a monotheist can in retrospect evaluate what I believe in. Well, I might be going against many of the forum rules limiting this discussion to non-trins, but do as you are lead and I can/will definitely not stop you.
 
perhaps this format would be easier to understand

3. (15-20) Paul’s meditation on the person and work of Jesus.



He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He may have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.



a. Paul started out thanking the Father for His plan of redemption (Colossians 1:12). He couldn’t do that without also thinking of the Son, the great Redeemer.



i. Most scholars think that Colossians 1:15-20 come from a poem or a hymn in the early Church that described what Christians believed about Jesus.



b. He is the image of the invisible God: Image (the ancient Greek word eikon) expresses two ideas. First, likeness, as in the image on a coin or the reflection in a mirror. Second, manifestation, with the sense that God is fully revealed in Jesus



i. If Paul meant that Jesus was merely similar to the Father, he would have used the ancient Greek word homoioma, which speaks of similar appearance.



ii. “God is invisible, which does not merely mean that He cannot be seen by our bodily eye, but that He is unknowable. In the exalted Christ the unknowable God becomes known.†(Peake)



iii. The ancient Jewish philosopher Philo equated the eikon of God with the Logos.



c. The firstborn over all creation: Firstborn (the ancient Greek word prototokos) can describe either priority in time, or supremacy in rank. As Paul uses it here, it probably has both ideas in mind, with Jesus being before all created things, and Jesus being of a supremely different order than all created things.



i. Firstborn is also used of Jesus in Colossians 1:18, Romans 8:29, Hebrews 1:6, and Revelation 1:5.



ii. In no way does the title firstborn indicate that Jesus is less than God. In fact, the ancient Rabbis called Yawhew Himself “Firstborn of the World†(Rabbi Bechai, cited in Lightfoot). Ancient rabbis used firstborn as a Messianic title: “God said, As I made Jacob a first-born (Exodus 4:22), so also will I make king Messiah a first-born (Psalm 89:28).†(R. Nathan in Shemoth Rabba, cited in Lightfoot)



iii. “The use of this word does not show what Arius argued that Paul regarded Christ as a creature like ‘all creation’ . . . It is rather the comparative (superlative) force of protos that is used.†(Robertson)



iv. Bishop Lightfoot, a noted Greek scholar, on the use of both eikon (image) and prototokos (firstborn): “As the Person of Christ was the Divine response alike to the philosophical questionings of the Alexandrian Jew and to the patriotic hopes of the Palestinian, these two currents of thought meet in the term prototokos as applied to our Lord, who is both the true Logos and the true Messiah.†(Lightfoot)



d. For by Him all things were created: There is no doubt that Jesus is the author of all creation. He Himself is not a created being. When we see the wonder and the glory of the world Jesus created, we worship and honor Him all the more.



i. Comets have vapor trails up to 10,000 miles long. If you could capture all that vapor, and put it in a bottle, the amount of vapor actually present in the bottle would take up less than 1 cubic inch of space.



ii. Saturn’s rings are 500,000 miles in circumference, but only about a foot thick.



iii. The star Antares is 60,000 times larger than our sun. If the sun were the size of a softball, the star Antares would be the size of a house.



iv. If the sun were the size of a beachball, and put on top of the Empire State Building, the nearest group of stars would be as far as way as Australia is to the Empire State Building.



v. A star known as LP 327-186 is a so called white dwarf. It is smaller than the state of Texas; yet it is so dense that if a cubic inch of it were brought to earth, it would weigh more than 1.5 million tons.



vi. The earth travels around the sun about eight times the speed of a bullet fired from a gun.



vii. There are more insects in one square mile of rural land than there are human beings on the entire earth.



viii. Bees make their own air conditioning. When the weather gets hot, and threatens to melt the wax in the hive, one group of bees will go to the entrance of the hive, and another will stay inside. They will then flap their wings all together, making a cross draft that pulls the hot air out of the hive, and draws cooler air inside



ix. A single human chromosome contains twenty billion bits of information. How much information is that? If written in ordinary books, in ordinary language, it would take about four thousand volumes.



e. Whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers: The “Colossian Heresy†seemed taken with an elaborate angelology, which effectively placed angels as mediators between God and man. Paul emphasizes that whatever ranks of spirit beings there may be, Jesus created them all and they all ultimately answer to Him.



f. He is before all things . . . who is the beginning: The ancient heretic Arius, who denied that Jesus was truly God, said there was a time when Jesus didn’t exist. Paul’s words here won’t allow for such a false teaching to be true, either in the days of Arius or our own day.



g. In Him all things consist: The idea that Jesus is both the unifying principle and the personal sustainer of all creation.



h. Jesus is also the head of the body, the church: Here, head probably refers to Jesus’ role as source of the church, even as we refer to the head of a river.



i. That in all things He may have the preeminence is a fitting summary of verses Colossians 1:15-18.



j. Fulness (the ancient Greek word pleroma) was really just another way to say that Jesus is truly God. It was “A recognized technical term in theology, denoting the totality of the Divine powers and attributes.†(Lightfoot)



i. “The Gnostics distributed the divine powers among various aeons. Paul gathers them all up in Christ, a full and flat statement of the deity of Christ.†(Robertson)



k. For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell: The ancient Greek word for dwell is used in the sense of a permanent dwelling. There is an entirely different word used for the sense of a temporary dwelling place.



i. Genesis 37:1 in the lxx - the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament - uses both Greek words in the same context, with their different meanings intact.



l. And by Him to reconcile all things to Himself: Jesus’ atoning work is full and broad. Yet we should not take Colossians 1:20 as an endorsement of universalism.



m. Again, notice where the peace was made: through the blood of the cross. We don’t make our own peace with God, but Jesus made peace for us through His work on the cross.



i. However, we should not regard the blood of the cross in a superstitious manner. It is not a magical potion, nor is it the literal blood of Jesus, literally applied that saves or cleanses us. If that were so, then His Roman executioners, splattered with His blood, would have been automatically saved, and the actual number of molecules of Jesus’ literal blood would limit the number of people who could be saved. The blood of the cross speaks to us of the real, physical death of Jesus Christ in our place, on our behalf, before God. That literal death in our place, and the literal judgment He bore on our behalf, is what saves us.
 
TanNinety said:
Thank you guys for your answers. This definitely takes an interesting turn for me.
To keep the discussion in order may be I should clarify the terms because I’ve seen people get into miscommunication on other discussion forums about this. I don’t really care if I got these definitions right but for the sake of this discussion I am going to presume such that soul is cognitive awareness, spirit is the life from God, flesh is an earthly body.

I have always pictured man as spirit + flesh which resulted in the by product of soul which by itself did not pre-exist. So what you are saying is that Christ was the first soul and we were later created after Him as souls.

Now Georges, I infer from your post that Christ was the same kind of soul as the soul of a man.

I think so...

Now you said Christ knew He was special and did not need this “soul training†on earth.

However he did have to learn...

Luk 2:52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

Having said that...of course Jesus didn't know all things.....of course this was before his baptism (before the HS of God) came upon him.

Still Jesus was special enough to discourse with the Temple rabbis at 12.


He did not lose His pre-knowledge of that time that He spent with God.

Got me on that one...memory repression until his baptism? could be.

What is wrong with our souls? If we share the same kind of souls with Christ (before His death and resurrection) why do we not retain this same soulish knowledge of our souls pre-existence?

I'm the Jewish belief is that the soul given to the fetus is pure...no knowledge and it has to learn....maybe the soul is just floating in space....who really knows.

Were our souls held in heavenly amniotic fluid? The reason I choose that is because, I do not have recollection of any of the 9 months I spent in my mothers womb even though you would concur that I had a soul (cognitive awareness). Or does our soul when it is brought by the angels into the fetus somehow go through a sort of memory wipe before the angels leave (men in black style)? If so, why did Jesus not go through this memory wipe?

Don't know of course, I'm in the same boat as you....One thing for sure, it appears Jesus has no heavenly recollection until after the baptism.

What criteria does God have in choosing the souls at birth? First come first serve? ..â€Âhey there is a mother to be, quick get me a soul from the storage room?†Or does God choose your parents to put the soul in? ..If so, what reasons does God have to place/plan/plant a soul in the flesh of a baby that is being born of rape/molestation/deformation?

Don't know...I do know that it is a Jewish belief that Messiah will not come until the "guf" is empty of all the soul's it holds...

Did God pre plan a soul for test tube babies as well?

never thought about it...

Apart from being jewish tradition is there any scriptural proof in the OT for the above?

Go to http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com and type in "Soul" in the search box...all the articles pertaining will appear.

I will rest these questions for now.
 
Imagican said:
LittleNipper said:
gingercat said:
TanNinety said:
Thank you ginger for a very interesting quote.

But the same can also be translated:
For in Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created through him, and for him

The above rendering of the verse does not require Jesus to pre-exist except in the mind, plan and purpose of God.

Care to try the questions I have? I can't seem to find answers to those questions without sounding too trinitarianish. Can you, may be?

Glad to :D

He is the image of the invisible God the first born over all creation. Colossians 1:15

I don't know how you can interprete this verse other ways except Jesus is God's first creation.


HE is (meaning JESUS) the image of the invisible GOD the first born (meaning HE has PREEMINENCE above everything) over all creation.

Little Nipper,

I can see that the 'churches' have taught you well 'grasshopper'. The problem is that the churches are as confused as the individuals that 'created' them.

Let me offer you these:


ONLY GOD can create from nothing. CHRIST created from nothing

Now, could not an 'all powerful God bestow His power to that which He wills?
ONLY GOD can heal. CHRIST healed.

You obviously failed to mention that the apostles 'healed also'. And Beni Hindi, (he he he).

ONLY GOD can forgive sin. CHRIST both forgave sin and died that all through faith may be forgiven.

The Pope says that HE can forgive too. But seriously, once again, if God so wills it that His Son be able to forgive sin, who are you or I to question this?

ONLY GOD has control over the elements. CHRIST calmed the storm.

Once again, you question the power of God to bestow such with whom He wills. How about the 'walls of Jericho'? How about the day that had NO darkness? How about thumping a rock with a stick and bringing forth water in the dessert?

ONLY GOD can raise the dead back to life. CHRIST both brought the dead back to life and over came the grave HIMSELF.

Once again, you seem to have forgotten that the apostles TOO, raised the dead back to life.

Only GOD is to be worshipped. At the name of the LORD JESUS CHRIST every knee WILL one day bow and every tongue WILL one day confess that JESUS CHRIST IS the LORD.

Now, look at you, you are such a 'good' Sunday school student. But the truth is, we were NEVER told that we MUST ONLY worship God. We were told to ONLY worship God AS THE GOD. So, once again, you have allowed the churches limited understand cloud your own. Christ may CERTAINLY be worshiped as 'something OTHER THAN God Himself', for He IS the Son of God. So, to worship Him AS the Son takes absolutely NOTHING away from the Father.

Peter healed the lame man in the name of JESUS CHRIST of Nazareth. See Acts 3:6. The power coming from the LORD JESUS CHRIST. When JESUS brought the young man back from the dead (Luke 7:14), JESUS said, "Young man, I SAY UNTO THEE, ARISE." Now, I'm not a Roman Catholic. But I cannot even imagine that a pope would say, "Get up and walk because I said so." So while the APOSTILES of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD were obviously temporarily given the ability to heal, etc., There was no mistaking exactly where that power originated from. And JESUS was glorified.
 
Thank you guys for your responses. I still seem to be on the fence with the pre-existence of Jesus.

If Jesus were a heavenly angelic being prior to His earthly birth, this seems possible. But my reservations about this are, when He was born that He possessed both His spirit and earthly flesh body. Because that falls right into the category of Trinitarian explanation of how Jesus was limited in His flesh and unlimited in His spirit both at the same time.

Philippians 2:6 who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not robbery to be equal to God, 7 but did empty himself, the form of a servant having taken, in the likeness of men having been made, 8 and in fashion having been found as a man, he humbled himself, having become obedient unto death -- death even of a cross,

It seems reasonable that He was in the form of God, a heavenly spiritual being, but emptied Himself, and was made a man. Jesus was as much a man as you and I were. He wasn’t some semi-spirit semi-flesh or full-spirit full-flesh(like the Trinitarians claim) but totally came in the flesh. Now the same transformation that He went through from spirit to man is what He went through at His resurrection as He went back to where He came from. That is the reason why I believe Jesus had to grow in stature, increase in wisdom, had to have the holy spirit rest upon Him, because when He came as a man He was completely a man and emptied Himself totally of His heavenly spiritual body.

Flip side of the coin, If Christ was indeed an angelic being before His earthly human birth. Why would …
Hebrew 1:5 For unto which of the angels said HE(God) at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

Hebrew 1:13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
…read that way if God never said that to any of His angles but Jesus was indeed an angelic being?

The above sent me back on the fence. There is more compelling evidence that Jesus pre-existed but I cant seem to get myself out of the knot of Hebrews 1.
 
TanNinety said:
The above sent me back on the fence. There is more compelling evidence that Jesus pre-existed but I cant seem to get myself out of the knot of Hebrews 1.

When trinitarians and non-trinitarians are arguing, you should go back to the original Scripture which is written in Greek for NT. Thats the only way for the true meanings and understandings.
 
TanNinety said:
Thank you guys for your responses. I still seem to be on the fence with the pre-existence of Jesus.

If Jesus were a heavenly angelic being prior to His earthly birth, this seems possible. But my reservations about this are, when He was born that He possessed both His spirit and earthly flesh body. Because that falls right into the category of Trinitarian explanation of how Jesus was limited in His flesh and unlimited in His spirit both at the same time.

Philippians 2:6 who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not robbery to be equal to God, 7 but did empty himself, the form of a servant having taken, in the likeness of men having been made, 8 and in fashion having been found as a man, he humbled himself, having become obedient unto death -- death even of a cross,

It seems reasonable that He was in the form of God, a heavenly spiritual being, but emptied Himself, and was made a man. Jesus was as much a man as you and I were. He wasn’t some semi-spirit semi-flesh or full-spirit full-flesh(like the Trinitarians claim) but totally came in the flesh. Now the same transformation that He went through from spirit to man is what He went through at His resurrection as He went back to where He came from. That is the reason why I believe Jesus had to grow in stature, increase in wisdom, had to have the holy spirit rest upon Him, because when He came as a man He was completely a man and emptied Himself totally of His heavenly spiritual body.

Flip side of the coin, If Christ was indeed an angelic being before His earthly human birth. Why would …
[quote:0b241] Hebrew 1:5 For unto which of the angels said HE(God) at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

Hebrew 1:13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
…read that way if God never said that to any of His angles but Jesus was indeed an angelic being?

The above sent me back on the fence. There is more compelling evidence that Jesus pre-existed but I cant seem to get myself out of the knot of Hebrews 1.[/quote:0b241]


Tan Ninety
The very scripture that many Unitarians use to try and plead their case is the very scripture that Paul uses to affirm the deity of Christ.
In order that I do not take this scripture out of contex like unitarians do, here is Col 1:15-18
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. 18 And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He may have the preeminence.
The New King James Version. 1982 (Col 1:15-18). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

Here is some commentary on what it means.

1:15–20 One component in the heresy threatening the Colossian church was the denial of the deity of Christ. Paul combats that damning element of heresy with an emphatic defense of Christ’s deity.
1:15 The Gr. word for “image†is eikōn, from which the Eng. word “icon†derives. It means, “copy†or “likeness.†Jesus Christ is the perfect imageâ€â€the exact likenessâ€â€of God and is in the very form of God (Phil. 2:6; cf. John 1:14; 14:9), and has been so from all eternity. By describing Jesus in this manner, Paul emphasizes that He is both the representation and manifestation of God. Thus, He is fully God in every way (cf. 2:9; John 8:58; 10:30–33; Heb. 1:8). the firstborn over all creation. Cf. v. 18. The Gr. word for “firstborn†can refer to one who was born first chronologically, but most often refers to pre-eminence in position, or rank (see note on Heb. 1:6; cf. Rom. 8:29). In both Greek and Jewish culture, the firstborn was the ranking son who had received the right of inheritance from his father, whether he was born first or not. It is used of Israel who, not being the first nation, was however the preeminent nation (cf. Ex. 4:22; Jer. 31:9). Firstborn in this context clearly means highest in rank, not first created (cf. Ps. 89:27; Rev. 1:5) for several reasons: 1) Christ cannot be both “first begotten†and “only begotten†(cf. John 1:14, 18; 3:16, 18; 1 John 4:9); 2) when the “firstborn†is one of a class, the class is in the plural form (cf. v. 18; Rom. 8:29), but “creation,†the class here, is in a singular form; 3) if Paul was teaching that Christ was a created being, he was agreeing with the heresy he was writing to refute; and 4) it is impossible for Christ to be both created, and the Creator of everything (v. 16). Thus Jesus is the firstborn in the sense that He has the preeminence (v. 18) and possesses the right of inheritance “over all creation†(cf. Heb. 1:2; Rev. 5:1–7, 13). He existed before the creation and is exalted in rank above it.
1:16 Thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. Cf. 2:15; Rom. 8:38; Eph. 1:21; 3:10; 6:12; 1 Pet. 3:22; Jude 6. These are various categories of angels whom Christ created and rules over. There is no comment regarding whether they are holy or fallen, since He is Lord of both groups. The false teachers had incorporated into their heresy the worship of angels, including the lie that Jesus was one of them, merely a spirit created by God and inferior to Him. Paul rejected that and made it clear that angels, whatever their rank, whether holy or fallen, are mere creatures, and their Creator is none other than the preeminent One, the Lord Savior, Jesus Christ. The purpose of His catalog of angelic ranks is to show the immeasurable superiority of Christ over any being the false teachers might suggest. All things were created through Him and for Him. Cf. Rom. 11:33–36. See notes on John 1:3; Heb. 1:2. As God, Jesus created the material and spiritual universe for His pleasure and glory.
1:17 He is before all things. When the universe had its beginning, Christ already existed, thus by definition He must be eternal (Mic. 5:2; John 1:1, 2; 8:58; 1 John 1:1; Rev. 22:13). consist. Lit. “to hold together.†Christ sustains the universe, maintaining the power and balance necessary to life’s existence and continuity (cf. Heb. 1:3).
1:18 head of the body. Cf. 2:19. Paul uses the human body as a metaphor for the church, of which Christ serves as the “head.†Just as a body is controlled from the brain, so Christ controls every part of the church and gives it life and direction. Cf. Eph. 4:15; 5:23.. This refers to both source and preeminence. The church had its origins in the Lord Jesus (Eph. 1:4), and He gave life to the church through His sacrificial death and resurrection to become its Sovereign. the firstborn from the dead. See note on v. 15. Jesus was the first chronologically to be resurrected, never to die again. Of all who have been or ever will be raised from the dead, and that includes all men (John 5:28, 29), Christ is supreme ; Phil. 2:8–11).


I really hope this makes sense to you. I will work On Hebrews Chapter 1 for you also where that chapter enforces the fact that Jesus is GOD (not created)
and how superior he is to everything created.
Gob Bless you and I pray his holy spirit will reveal himself to you in this study and may you find his son Jesus the Logos
 
jgredline said:
Gob Bless you and I pray his holy spirit will reveal himself to you in this study and may you find his son Jesus the Logos
Thank you jgredline and ginger. I could always use the assistance of the holy spirit. Nothing better than the spirit of truth to bring things to our remembrance.
 
Hi TanNinety,

It is a curious thing when people read a question and automatically apply a bias to it which then influences their answer. This seems to apply to those on both sides of this issue.

Hebrews 1:5 & 13 ask a simple question, why assume the answer?

The focus of the question is which one?

The answer is in Psalm 45:7 and the second witness is Hebrews 1:9.

Studying these texts by really examining every aspect and concept that can be identified, should reveal the truth that their words demand.

Then consider Genesis 48:15-16, Psalm 2, Acts 13:33-35 and Hebrews 5:1-11. Also look at John 1:18 in the NASB (monogenes theos).

What people don't know or won't accept is that Jesus Christ, as a messenger or agent of the Most High God, was given the names and titles of God - he was the perfect representation of Him. Thus he carries the names and titles of his Father including, Yahovah, elohim or theos (of which there are many), malak of YHVH, malak of Elohim, malak of the Presence, Pen'iel and others.

Thus we find texts that say things such as, "Therefore elohim, your Elohim has anointed you above your comapanions" and "the theos and pater of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Colossians 1:3, Ephesions 1:3, 1 Peter 1:3).

What many trinitarians try to assert is that God manifested Himself as an angel on different occasions, but this is contrary to the language of the Bible and easily proven to be false.

I hope you find this helpful,
R7-12
 
R7-12 said:
Hi TanNinety,

It is a curious thing when people read a question and automatically apply a bias to it which then influences their answer. This seems to apply to those on both sides of this issue.

Hebrews 1:5 & 13 ask a simple question, why assume the answer?

The focus of the question is which one?

The answer is in Psalm 45:7 and the second witness is Hebrews 1:9.

Studying these texts by really examining every aspect and concept that can be identified, should reveal the truth that their words demand.

Then consider Genesis 48:15-16, Psalm 2, Acts 13:33-35 and Hebrews 5:1-11. Also look at John 1:18 in the NASB (monogenes theos).

What people don't know or won't accept is that Jesus Christ, as a messenger or agent of the Most High God, was given the names and titles of God - he was the perfect representation of Him. Thus he carries the names and titles of his Father including, Yahovah, elohim or theos (of which there are many), malak of YHVH, malak of Elohim, malak of the Presence, Pen'iel and others.

Thus we find texts that say things such as, "Therefore elohim, your Elohim has anointed you above your comapanions" and "the theos and pater of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Colossians 1:3, Ephesions 1:3, 1 Peter 1:3).

What many trinitarians try to assert is that God manifested Himself as an angel on different occasions, but this is contrary to the language of the Bible and easily proven to be false.

I hope you find this helpful,
R7-12

Well R7 prove it
 
jgredline said:
R7-12 said:
What many trinitarians try to assert is that God manifested Himself as an angel on different occasions, but this is contrary to the language of the Bible and easily proven to be false.

Well R7 prove it
Thank you jgredline. It would be my pleasure and ironically it's currently in progress in the thread titled: The Identity of the Pre-Incarnate Messiah.

It's a Bible study I'm conducting so please be aware that it is not a debate thread but is open for beneficial and edifying questions and comments. Also be aware that it will take several additional posts to more fully develop the study due the number of texts and concepts which must be examined.

R7-12
 
Back
Top