I
Imagican
Guest
Free said:Oh come on Imagican, if you are going to argue against trinitarianism then argue against it. Don't set up a straw man and then think you have made a good argument.Imagican said:Now, here's my question: When one reads verses such as these, is there NEVER a question about the validity of 'trinity'? I mean, what does this mean to you: "....from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. NO, not, 'from God our Father who IS the Lord Jesus Christ', but, 'from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ'. Don't you get it? I mean how much would you have to 'twist' what this states plainly and openly to turn it into something other than it is?
So Free,
Are you saying that the point I offered isn't even worth answering. For this becomes obvious in your response. I AM arguing 'trinity' and the point that I made IS perfectly valid.
You claim 'strawman'. I claim 'truth'. You claim strawman for you obviously 'see' the validity of my point and have NO valid argument against it. This is how MOST 'trins' react when faced with the 'truth'. It's not a matter of 'truth' to them, it's simply a matter of defending a doctrine that the have chosen to believe in 'regardless' of whether it's 'true' or not.
YOU are the one that has offered 'strawman'. You evade the 'truth' and instead choose to attack ME instead of the argument for lack of a logical or meaningful defense.