O
Orthodox Christian
Guest
Clearly I do not have the same definition of revelation as you- but, as I mentioned, other people have- people like Charles Taze Russell, who, when meditating on the scriptures regarding Michael the Archangel, who defends Israel, came to understand that Jesus was actually Michael, incarnated. Of course, Russell's anti-Trinitarian beliefs may have moved him toward said revelation.Squeakybro said:Orthodox you said
I encourage you to continue to seek God for revelation- after all, God is Lord and has revealed Himself to us: this is the heart of the Christian faith. I wonder though, now as I often do, at those who believe that after 2000 years of martyrs, mystics, poets, Pietists, monks, preachers, and so forth, how it is that you - and others- come to believe that everyone else is wrong, and that you're right. I'm not saying that this couldn't possibly be, but it does seem unlikely. Double the unlikeliness when you have ignore strong scriptural arguments, triple the unlikeliness when people who disagree about so many things agree that you are missing the boat entirely.
I said
What in the world are you talking about here. Do you even know what a revelation is???? Its a series of verses from all over the new testament given while in meditation. Do you even know what the difference is between the milk understanding and the meat understanding?????
The difference between milk and meat, as mentioned by Paul in 1 Corinthians 3, is obvious:
Milk is easy, pleasing, nurturing food for the dependent babe- one who is not ready to face the hardships of this present age.
Meat, on the other hand, is hard to swallow truth for the maturing, who are then expected to be able to work and to be held responsible and accountable for the meat that they have ingested.
Accountable how? As it is written again, this time in Hebrews 5:14- to discern between good and evil.
Do not think for one moment that "meat" is hidden mystery for the truly spiritual- that is a temptation of the evil one, gnostic/elitist rubbish.