Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seventh Day Adventists.

B

brakelite2

Guest
With this thread I am not propmoting SDA doctrine, but desire to clear up some misconceptions many hold regards our faith and teaching.

That there is a strong perception within the Christian world that the SDA church teaches that by the keeping of the 'law', one can be saved, there can be no doubt. Whether this is because of members' ignorant of the truth, or because of poor PR I do not know. Not only do I disagree that we can be justified by keeping the law, but to my understanding of SDA teaching, they do not teach that either.
What I do believe however is this.
I am justified by faith in the shed blood of Jesus. His death paid in full the price I owed God for my sin. His resurrection ensured that I may have hope of eternal life when He returns and I am raised to meet the Lord in the air and so shall I ever be with Him.

In the meantime, I have a battle to fight. It is against the flesh and carnal nature with which I was born. Christ's death and resurrection however gives me huge advantage in this battle, because God included me in the death of His Son. A wonderful transaction has occurred. His life for mine. His righteousness for my sinfulness. Not only is my name now recorded in the books of heaven, but God has sent me His Holy Spirit that my life in the here and now may be so drastically changed, that is is actually transformed into the very image of the character of my Saviour's.
This takes time however. Some changes came overnight, (like the drugs and alcohol) but other things have taken somewhat longer. After 30 years a Christian (12 as an SDA) the battle is still being fought. But praise God, He is winning.
This new character, or new birth, is a daily fight. I must daily submit my-self to the cross and die. To surrender daily is my only hope of continuing to overcome sin in all it's hideous and myriad forms.
The new character that is being formed within, being the very character of Christ's, is in harmony with the law. If it is not in harmony with God's commandments, then the flesh or carnal nature is gaining ground, and I must once again humble myself and allow God to get me back on track. Because if I persist in allowing the carnal nature to overcome the work God has done, sooner or later all will be lost.
This is not a works based salvation, all is of faith. I can of myself do nothing. It is all Christ formed within. By His grace, His power, His Spirit. I cannot any more keep the 6th or 7th commandment by my own strength than I can the 4th. (But I have seen, in my years of study and prayer, no reason why the 4th commandment should be excluded from the 10.)
It is not the ten commandment law that was nailed to the cross on calvary.
It was me. The law still lives, in all it's entirety.
Romans 7 shows this. The husband represents the flesh. He died. The law that the wife was bound to because she was bound to her husband, still lives. She is free however from the condemnation of that law, but because she is married to another (Christ) , and He now gives us the grace and power to overcome sin, and walk as He walked, in harmony with the law.
As a child now of the Father, I delight to obey Him. And allow Him to mold me into the person He needs me to be in order to advance His kingdom, and glorify Him.
The question posed by many is are SDA's saved or are they a cult outside of Christianity? The answer to that is yes, they are saved, if they trust in the shed blood of Christ, remain faithful to Him, and do not trust in their keeping of the law.

Now I am sure that there are many in my church denomination that are trusting in their own righteousness and their keeping of the law to get to heaven. Just as in every denomination
there are some who misunderstand the basics and fundamentals of faith.
However, while there are many who could rightly be termed 'legalists' in our church, I am sure there are some in many other denominations also. I would also suggest that in every denomination there are some who swing to the opposite extreme, and trumpet 'grace grace' and think that once they are saved they can do what they like.
Here is how I view the matter of law.

How was Israel saved from bondage in Egypt? By works? No. By the law? No.
They were saved by the blood of the Passover Lamb. In order to be saved by that blood they had to have faith in God's word that:
a. There was a definite an imminent threat of death.(Rom 6:23)
b. That the application of the blood of the Lamb would indeed protect them and save them.
Now " For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:".
It was after they were saved that God showed them His law. They could not bypass Sinai. "This is how you now must live" God said. Obey Me and live, and I will lead you to the promised land. What happened to those who did not obey? They fell in the wilderness. "But they had the blood of the Lamb to cover them" some may say. That was not enough was it. Disobedience nullified the blood and they entered not into God's promises.
These things were written for our example,that we may learn from them.
Heb 4:11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

Now that we are saved also by the blood of the Passover Lamb let us not bypass Sinai or think that we can ignore God's requirements. Know assuredly that those who do, though they may claim salvation, will not enter in to the promised land.

The above may not be the thoughts of every Seventh Day Adventist. But to the best of my knowledge, it is a fair representation of official SDA teaching.
 
brakelite2 said:
What I do believe however is this.
I am justified by faith in the shed blood of Jesus. His death paid in full the price I owed God for my sin. His resurrection ensured that I may have hope of eternal life when He returns and I am raised to meet the Lord in the air and so shall I ever be with Him.

In the meantime, I have a battle to fight. It is against the flesh and carnal nature with which I was born. Christ's death and resurrection however gives me huge advantage in this battle, because God included me in the death of His Son. A wonderful transaction has occurred. His life for mine. His righteousness for my sinfulness. Not only is my name now recorded in the books of heaven, but God has sent me His Holy Spirit that my life in the here and now may be so drastically changed, that is is actually transformed into the very image of the character of my Saviour's.

The above may not be the thoughts of every Seventh Day Adventist. But to the best of my knowledge, it is a fair representation of official SDA teaching.
brakelite,

Do a little more Scriptural study concerning the resurrection. Don't go to commentaries or to your other source to explain the resurrection.

Peter, John and Paul all testified to the power of the resurrection and its blessedness upon us in our fighting the good fight of faith; and our Lord above all.

Your brother in the Lord Jesus,
Joe
 
brakelite2 said:
With this thread I am not propmoting SDA doctrine, but desire to clear up some misconceptions many hold regards our faith and teaching.

That there is a strong perception within the Christian world that the SDA church teaches that by the keeping of the 'law', one can be saved, there can be no doubt. Whether this is because of members' ignorant of the truth, or because of poor PR I do not know. Not only do I disagree that we can be justified by keeping the law, but to my understanding of SDA teaching, they do not teach that either.
What I do believe however is this.
I am justified by faith in the shed blood of Jesus. His death paid in full the price I owed God for my sin. His resurrection ensured that I may have hope of eternal life when He returns and I am raised to meet the Lord in the air and so shall I ever be with Him.

In the meantime, I have a battle to fight. It is against the flesh and carnal nature with which I was born. Christ's death and resurrection however gives me huge advantage in this battle, because God included me in the death of His Son. A wonderful transaction has occurred. His life for mine. His righteousness for my sinfulness. Not only is my name now recorded in the books of heaven, but God has sent me His Holy Spirit that my life in the here and now may be so drastically changed, that is is actually transformed into the very image of the character of my Saviour's.
This takes time however. Some changes came overnight, (like the drugs and alcohol) but other things have taken somewhat longer. After 30 years a Christian (12 as an SDA) the battle is still being fought. But praise God, He is winning.
This new character, or new birth, is a daily fight. I must daily submit my-self to the cross and die. To surrender daily is my only hope of continuing to overcome sin in all it's hideous and myriad forms.
The new character that is being formed within, being the very character of Christ's, is in harmony with the law. If it is not in harmony with God's commandments, then the flesh or carnal nature is gaining ground, and I must once again humble myself and allow God to get me back on track. Because if I persist in allowing the carnal nature to overcome the work God has done, sooner or later all will be lost.
This is not a works based salvation, all is of faith. I can of myself do nothing. It is all Christ formed within. By His grace, His power, His Spirit. I cannot any more keep the 6th or 7th commandment by my own strength than I can the 4th. (But I have seen, in my years of study and prayer, no reason why the 4th commandment should be excluded from the 10.)
It is not the ten commandment law that was nailed to the cross on calvary.
It was me. The law still lives, in all it's entirety.
Romans 7 shows this. The husband represents the flesh. He died. The law that the wife was bound to because she was bound to her husband, still lives. She is free however from the condemnation of that law, but because she is married to another (Christ) , and He now gives us the grace and power to overcome sin, and walk as He walked, in harmony with the law.
As a child now of the Father, I delight to obey Him. And allow Him to mold me into the person He needs me to be in order to advance His kingdom, and glorify Him.
The question posed by many is are SDA's saved or are they a cult outside of Christianity? The answer to that is yes, they are saved, if they trust in the shed blood of Christ, remain faithful to Him, and do not trust in their keeping of the law.

Now I am sure that there are many in my church denomination that are trusting in their own righteousness and their keeping of the law to get to heaven. Just as in every denomination
there are some who misunderstand the basics and fundamentals of faith.
However, while there are many who could rightly be termed 'legalists' in our church, I am sure there are some in many other denominations also. I would also suggest that in every denomination there are some who swing to the opposite extreme, and trumpet 'grace grace' and think that once they are saved they can do what they like.
Here is how I view the matter of law.

How was Israel saved from bondage in Egypt? By works? No. By the law? No.
They were saved by the blood of the Passover Lamb. In order to be saved by that blood they had to have faith in God's word that:
a. There was a definite an imminent threat of death.(Rom 6:23)
b. That the application of the blood of the Lamb would indeed protect them and save them.
Now " For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:".
It was after they were saved that God showed them His law. They could not bypass Sinai. "This is how you now must live" God said. Obey Me and live, and I will lead you to the promised land. What happened to those who did not obey? They fell in the wilderness. "But they had the blood of the Lamb to cover them" some may say. That was not enough was it. Disobedience nullified the blood and they entered not into God's promises.
These things were written for our example,that we may learn from them.
Heb 4:11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

Now that we are saved also by the blood of the Passover Lamb let us not bypass Sinai or think that we can ignore God's requirements. Know assuredly that those who do, though they may claim salvation, will not enter in to the promised land.

The above may not be the thoughts of every Seventh Day Adventist. But to the best of my knowledge, it is a fair representation of official SDA teaching.


Proper doctrine cannot be claimed by any one group as being officially theirs. A doctrine is either Christian or not. If you hold to Christian doctrine, why do you separate yourself into a sepatate denomination? What is an Adventist the other 6 days of the week? :gah
 
brakelite2,

It is important to understand the testimony of God through the spirit of Jesus Christ to the council of the Jews by the mouth of Stephen.

Acts 7:39
and in their hearts turned back to Egypt,
Acts 7:42
42 "But God turned away and delivered them up to serve the host of heaven; NAS

Joe
 
Adullam said:
Proper doctrine cannot be claimed by any one group as being officially theirs.

Seeing that there is only "little" of Christianity that believes in a consistent doctrine and set of beliefs based "solely" on the Torah and Tanakh it would be hard for most "Christian" denominations to claim anything as being "officially" theirs. And yes Virginia, I am speaking of my SDA brethren as well.

A doctrine is either Christian or not.

So veneration of images and paintings of the "Queen of Heaven" is Christian? Rolling in the hay searching for "Ishtar" eggs is Christian?

If you hold to Christian doctrine, why do you separate yourself into a sepatate denomination?

Because most don't hold the "seventh-day" sabbath as doctrine in favor of the authority of Rome.

What is an Adventist the other 6 days of the week? :gah

Christians that happen to go to church on the sabbath.
 
RND said:
Adullam said:
Proper doctrine cannot be claimed by any one group as being officially theirs.

Seeing that there is only "little" of Christianity that believes in a consistent doctrine and set of beliefs based "solely" on the Torah and Tanakh it would be hard for most "Christian" denominations to claim anything as being "officially" theirs. And yes Virginia, I am speaking of my SDA brethren as well.

A doctrine is either Christian or not.

So veneration of images and paintings of the "Queen of Heaven" is Christian? Rolling in the hay searching for "Ishtar" eggs is Christian?

That's under the or not part! ;)

[quote:28ztmk3q]If you hold to Christian doctrine, why do you separate yourself into a sepatate denomination?

Because most don't hold the "seventh-day" sabbath as doctrine in favor of the authority of Rome.

There are Christians who meet daily as in the bible. Full time church.

What is an Adventist the other 6 days of the week? :gah

Christians that happen to go to church on the sabbath.[/quote:28ztmk3q]

Full time Christianity swallows up all petty differences! :)
 
Adullam said:
Full time Christianity swallows up all petty differences! :)

And yet, the correction of error never ceases.

2Ti 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2Ti 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

The picture of Jesus Christ in the Torah and Tanakh should be enough to fill a man......
 
RND said:
Adullam said:
Full time Christianity swallows up all petty differences! :)

And yet, the correction of error never ceases.

2Ti 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2Ti 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

The picture of Jesus Christ in the Torah and Tanakh should be enough to fill a man......



Holiness is built upon righteousness. The new Covenant is built upon the old. So the teachings of righteousness of the OT are a foundation to the gospel. :)
 
Adullam said:
Holiness is built upon righteousness.

I can't be righteous on my own therefore I must rely on Jesus.

The new Covenant is built upon the old. So the teachings of righteousness of the OT are a foundation to the gospel. :)

Right. Therefore there is nothing in the "Old Covenant" that has been eliminated as so many modern Christians are taught today.
 
I don't understand why some seem to be rebuking brakelite2 for his presentation. I thought he put it quite fairly. Seventh Day Adventist churches do not teach salvation by works just as brakelite2 said.

This is understood by most fundamentalist and evangelical churches today. At one time SDA was considered to be a cult. Most evangelicals now accept Seventh Day Adventists as evangelical.
 
Paidon if anyone thinks keeping the law is touch, 1 Corinthians 13 is the pinnacle! How's things at Steve's site? I noticed you don't have the link anymore in your siggy; what's up wit'dat?
 
Adullam said:
Proper doctrine cannot be claimed by any one group as being officially theirs. A doctrine is either Christian or not. If you hold to Christian doctrine, why do you separate yourself into a sepatate denomination? What is an Adventist the other 6 days of the week? :gah
After re-reading my post I found no inference that my denomination has sole possession of all truth. Another misconception maybe that needs clearing up? Nowhere in all my reading of adventist literature have I ever come across any suggestion that
a. Adventists are the only suppository of truth or
b. There are not other genuine Christians in other denominations.

So why am I an adventist?
1. Because as far as I know adventists are the only denomination or non-denominational group in my area that still teaches an historicist perspective of prophecy. A perspective that is scriptural, logical, reasonable, and more and more as the days draw nearer to the second advent, vindicated by current events.
2. Because as far as I know adventists are the only denomination in my area that teach and practice all the commandments of God.
3. Because as far as I know adventists are the only denomination in the world that are spreading the final message of warning to a world lost in confusion and sin. This warning is found in Revelation 14 and includes 3 separate and distinct messages which comprise the full everlasting gospel to mankind.
4. Because adventists are the only denomination that teaches the right balance according to my reading of the scriptures, between faith and works, grace , mercy and justice, and who also teach a sound systematic theology. Allow me to give you just one example of sound doctrinmal teaching from an adventist evangelist. Choose any of his sermons from this site, and get back to me and tell me what you think. http://www.loudcry.org
5. Because unless you can find for me a group of people whether denominational or otherwise, with whom I can fellowship in my area, that do all of the above in a manner more scripturally sound than does the Seventh Day Adventist church, I will remain faithful to them,otherwise I would join your alternative in a minute.

Regards
BL
 
Joe67 said:
brakelite2,

It is important to understand the testimony of God through the spirit of Jesus Christ to the council of the Jews by the mouth of Stephen.

Acts 7:39
and in their hearts turned back to Egypt,
Acts 7:42
42 "But God turned away and delivered them up to serve the host of heaven; NAS

Joe
Hey Joe!! I am not sure what you are inferring; forgive my slowness. Please can you elucidate more clearly what you are meaning?
 
Paidion said:
I don't understand why some seem to be rebuking brakelite2 for his presentation. I thought he put it quite fairly. Seventh Day Adventist churches do not teach salvation by works just as brakelite2 said.
Thankyou Paidion. And that was the purpose of the thread, not so much as a foundation for debate, but rather as a clearing up of popular misconception. Appreciate your perception in recognizing that.
Paidion said:
This is understood by most fundamentalist and evangelical churches today. At one time SDA was considered to be a cult. Most evangelicals now accept Seventh Day Adventists as evangelical.
At this site we adventists all appreciate I am sure the freedom we have to share our thoughts and beliefs with others.I am sure that I speak for the catholics and those of other 'marginal' faiths such as JWs and Mormans, that they at the very least have an opportunity for discussion. It is a wonderful thing that the owners of the site have the foresight and trust that the members here are well able to decide for themselves what is truth by comparing our beliefs with scripture and as Paul advises, "prove all things and hold fast that which is good."
Other sites however are not all so accommodating. And as far as adventism is concerned, I would suggest, such as my post infers, that the main reason is not because of biblical exegesis, but because of presumption and misconception. In fact, it was not until I began visiting these forums as an adventist, that I first became aware such prejudice existed. (He heh, maybe here in NZ we are too isolated :P ).
 
Paidion said:
I don't understand why some seem to be rebuking brakelite2 for his presentation. I thought he put it quite fairly. Seventh Day Adventist churches do not teach salvation by works just as brakelite2 said.

This is understood by most fundamentalist and evangelical churches today. At one time SDA was considered to be a cult. Most evangelicals now accept Seventh Day Adventists as evangelical.
So, can I be saved without keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath?

If I can, then why do I need to keep it, since it does not make a difference to my salvation?
 
RND said:
Adullam said:
Holiness is built upon righteousness.

I can't be righteous on my own therefore I must rely on Jesus.

Do you walk as Jesus walked then?

The new Covenant is built upon the old. So the teachings of righteousness of the OT are a foundation to the gospel. :)

Right. Therefore there is nothing in the "Old Covenant" that has been eliminated as so many modern Christians are taught today.


I said righteousness not holiness....temple holiness has been replaced with a true holiness in Christ. Read Hebrews for the low down on the New Covenant ;) !
 
If keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath will not save me, and not keeping it will not condemn me, then why do I need to keep it?

Will my keeping it make me more righteous than those who do not keep it?

Will Christ reject me if I do not keep it?

Will I go to ‘heaven’ if I do keep it, or go to ‘hell’ if I don’t keep it?

Am I worshiping Rome or the “Beast†if I don’t keep it?

Am I being disobedient to God if I don’t keep it?

Does my keeping or not keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath determine if I am obedient or disobedient to God?

Is the Seventh Day Sabbath a means by which I am “judged’ as being obedient or disobedient in God’s sight?

If my not keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath will not condemn me; if my not keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath will not prevent me from ‘heaven’; if I can be obedient to God and righteous in his sight without keeping it; if God accepts me even if I don’t keep it, then why on God’s earth do I need to keep it?

Can someone tell me, please?
 
Gman said:
So, can I be saved without keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath?

Sure, anyone can there are loads and loads of people that do not know that Saturday is the sabbath,

If I can, then why do I need to keep it, since it does not make a difference to my salvation?

Hbr 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Jam 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin.

We all make choices in life.....you seem to have made yours.
 
RND said:
Gman said:
If I can, then why do I need to keep it, since it does not make a difference to my salvation?

Hbr 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Jam 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin.

We all make choices in life.....you seem to have made yours.
So, am I to conclude that If I do not keep the Seventh Day Sabbath I am a sinner?

And no "choices" has been made. I am just trying to make sense of what you suggest we should keep. I don't see it in scriptures.
 
Back
Top