Drew
Member
The suggestion here is that those who do not see things JM's ways are not believers. In previous threads, he has essentially called dissenters (to his view) "wicked". To try to carry the debate by casting aspersions on the motives of one's opponent is something I would have thought we might have risen above. I think it is much more constructive to present actual coherent arguments and let the arguments "do the talking".JM said:Eph. 1:11 In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will,
Do you believe it?
There's a lot of scripture that says the same. Try to make an attempt not to blind yourself to them. For those that are not His, this truth is very offensive and they will go to great lengths to convince themselves that it isn't true.
JM: What is a secondary cause, please?