There is a great rift in the American family that has, in my opinion, done more harm than can be measured. Even in traditional "nuculear families" that are comprised of two parents it is more often than not the case that 'Daddy' is missing. He's at work following the need he feels to provide which isn't a bad thing except when it becomes the focus to the exclusion of other more important issues.
If it could be said that the goal and function of the family is to raise healthy, productive children -- then it follows that this would be the primary function of the leader (so called) of the family.
When I look at the goals of the Women's Movement who have said that they want equality with men a certain amount of admiration is formed. At least they have defined and communicated the basic idea to society in general. That progress has helped get advertisers on their side, because they know where the money is. Advertisers have spent billions upon billions trying to understand how the different demographics think and have targeted women (the ones who hold the purse-strings in most families) as well as children. Women have benefited from this but have also been hurt by marketing attempts to "empower" them. They are constantly being subjected with the need to remain young and sexually alluring because that's the key to sales in the minds of madison avenue - fear.
In the same way, men have been portrayed as, frankly --idiots. The stories and narratives that are spun by those who control the sales campaigns and marketing stragedies portray men as bumbling idiots or as pimps or as a generation who has sold out and consider money to be the solution to all problems. Success has been redefined and men's abjucation of duty to family and especially children has been ignored, replaces by the respect gained from atheletic prowess or financial success. What are men? They are [fill in the blank]. How far down the list must we travel to find the answer: fathers and/or dads? If men were more joined in and focused on the need to raise healthy children, if they were not absent at PTA, if they lead their families and insisted on the basics, education, moral fiber, proper nutrition, and the real and primary role of fathers --> to delight their children, how much would THAT go to heal our nation and society? How quickly would women jump back into the union they once dreamed of? It is my thought that if dads were no longer absent in heart from the family, families could then go on to much more than they can today foresee or even dream of. The momentum of such a thing, in truth --> would supply such directed, self-reinforcing power that (again, in my opinion) healing would flow.
I started this post to see if we could generate discussion about how society has made it okay for dads to just become token fathers and how images and roles they play on television, in commercials (can you even think of a 'dad commercial') in newsmedia is shaping our ideas to our detriment. Your thoughts and contributions are welcome.
~Sparrow
If it could be said that the goal and function of the family is to raise healthy, productive children -- then it follows that this would be the primary function of the leader (so called) of the family.
When I look at the goals of the Women's Movement who have said that they want equality with men a certain amount of admiration is formed. At least they have defined and communicated the basic idea to society in general. That progress has helped get advertisers on their side, because they know where the money is. Advertisers have spent billions upon billions trying to understand how the different demographics think and have targeted women (the ones who hold the purse-strings in most families) as well as children. Women have benefited from this but have also been hurt by marketing attempts to "empower" them. They are constantly being subjected with the need to remain young and sexually alluring because that's the key to sales in the minds of madison avenue - fear.
In the same way, men have been portrayed as, frankly --idiots. The stories and narratives that are spun by those who control the sales campaigns and marketing stragedies portray men as bumbling idiots or as pimps or as a generation who has sold out and consider money to be the solution to all problems. Success has been redefined and men's abjucation of duty to family and especially children has been ignored, replaces by the respect gained from atheletic prowess or financial success. What are men? They are [fill in the blank]. How far down the list must we travel to find the answer: fathers and/or dads? If men were more joined in and focused on the need to raise healthy children, if they were not absent at PTA, if they lead their families and insisted on the basics, education, moral fiber, proper nutrition, and the real and primary role of fathers --> to delight their children, how much would THAT go to heal our nation and society? How quickly would women jump back into the union they once dreamed of? It is my thought that if dads were no longer absent in heart from the family, families could then go on to much more than they can today foresee or even dream of. The momentum of such a thing, in truth --> would supply such directed, self-reinforcing power that (again, in my opinion) healing would flow.
I started this post to see if we could generate discussion about how society has made it okay for dads to just become token fathers and how images and roles they play on television, in commercials (can you even think of a 'dad commercial') in newsmedia is shaping our ideas to our detriment. Your thoughts and contributions are welcome.
~Sparrow
Last edited by a moderator: