Untrue.
Try reading the link I gave you.
The so called apocryphal books were part of the Septuagint which was widely used by Jews outside Israel.
They were accepted by the Church before the "Council of Jamnia"
The oldest Christian list of the Books of the Old Testament, which is in the LXX, is from Bishop Melito, who died in AD 180, as found in the Historian Eusebius
“But in the Extracts made by him the same writer [i.e. Melito] gives at the beginning of the Introduction a catalog of the acknowledged books of the Old Testament, which it is necessary to quote at this point. He writes as follows: "Melito to his brother Onesimus, greeting! Since you have often, in your zeal for the Word, expressed a wish to have extracts made from the Law and the Prophets concerning the Saviour, and concerning our entire Faith, and have also desired to have an accurate statement of the ancient books, as regards their number and their order, I have endeavored to perform the task, knowing your zeal for the faith, and your desire to gain information in regard to the Word, and knowing that you, in your yearning after God, esteem these things above all else, struggling to attain eternal salvation. Accordingly when I went to the East and reached the place where these things were preached and done, I learned accurately the books of the Old Testament, and I send them to you as written below. These are their names: Of Moses five, Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus, Deuteronomy; Joshua the son of Nun, Judges, Ruth, four of Kingdoms, two of Chronicles, the Psalms of David, Solomon's Proverbs also Wisdom, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Job; of the Prophets: Isaiah, Jeremiah, the Twelve [minor prophets] in one book, Daniel, Ezekiel, Esdras. From which also I have made the extracts, dividing them into six books." Such are the words of Melito.” (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History iv. 26)
You will see here, that the only extra book that is referred to, is "Wisdom", which can be in the Greek text, an additional name for the Book of Proverbs. There is no mention, in the 2nd century, of any of the other additional books!
The earliest list of OT Books by a Roman Catholic, is in the writings of Pope Innocent I, in AD 405, over 200 years later than Melito!
“Which books really are received in the canon, this brief addition shows. These therefore are the things of which you desired to be informed. Five books of Moses, that is, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, and Joshua the son of Nun, and Judges, and the four books of Kings [1&2 Samuel, 1&2 Kings] together with Ruth, sixteen books of the Prophets, five books of Solomon [Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs,
Wisdom of Solomon, and
Ecclesiasticus], and the Psalms. Also of the historical books, one book of Job, one of
Tobit, one of Esther, one of
Judith,
two of Maccabees, two of Ezra [Ezra and Nehemiah], two of Chronicles” (Letter to Exsuperius, bishop of Toulouse)
Notice that Innocent says the Books he refers to are in the "canon", at his time, and yet there any many that are in the present OT in the Roman Catholic Bible, that are missing in this "canon" of the early 5th century!
In the Council that was held in Laodecea, in AD 363, we have the following Books of the OT Canon
“Let no private psalms nor any uncanonical books be read in church, but only the canonical ones of the New and Old Testament. It is proper to recognize as many books as these: of the Old Testament, 1. the Genesis of the world; 2. the Exodus from Egypt; 3. Leviticus; 4. Numbers; 5. Deuteronomy; 6. Joshua the son of Nun; 7. Judges and Ruth; 8. Esther; 9. First and Second Kings [i.e. First and Second Samuel]; 10. Third and Fourth Kings [i.e. First and Second Kings]; 11. First and Second Chronicles; 12. First and Second Ezra [i.e. Ezra and Nehemiah]; 13. the book of one hundred and fifty Psalms; 14. the Proverbs of Solomon; 15. Ecclesiastes; 16. Song of Songs; 17. Job; 18. the Twelve [minor] Prophets; 19. Isaiah; 20. Jeremiah and
Baruch, Lamentations and the
Epistle [of Jeremiah]; 21. Ezekiel; 22. Daniel. (B.F. Westcott, A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament)
Here you will only find TWO of the books in the Roman Catholic Bible!
The Old Syriac Version of the OT, the Peshitta, made in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, from the Hebrew OT, never included in the original version, any of the "Apocryphal" books
“Thirdly, the
earlier form [original]
of the Peshitta, a daughter version of the Septuagint, seems to have
omitted the additional books [apocrypha] and Chronicles. If it was of Christian origin, this would be a pointer to the
restriction of the canonical list within the Church.” (P R Ackroyd and C F Evans;
The Cambridge History of the Bible, Vol. I, pp.158-159)
“It is one of the best of the ancient versions in accuracy and general excellence. It adheres closely to the Hebrew text with few variations…This version originally contained all the canonical books of the Old Testament with the exception of Chronicles, but none of the Apocrypha; these were, however, at an early period rendered into Syriac “ (William Green, General Introduction to the Old Testament: Text, pp. 112,113)
Chronicles, are the only 2 Books that are missing. But none of the additional books in the Roman Catholic Bible, were ever part of the Hebrew Bible in the 1st century AD!
Can you provide earlier evidence for these additional books in the Roman Catholic Bible, in the LXX?
The Old Testament is Jewish and written in Hebrew, and there is not ONE Jewish source that ever included any of these additional books!