The Biblical Timeline Backbone - 37 Events from Creation to New Jerusalem

[Free]

Concerning the 2,000 years between the resurrection of Christ and the tribulation. Is there another/better explanation for the prophecy of Hosea 5:15-6:2 ?

Yes: it likely refers to just a relatively short period before the restoration of Israel and Judah if they "return to the LORD." It could also refer to the resurrection of Jesus as a literal three days. It's a little hard to see how it could refer to a period beginning about 800 years after the prophecy was given, when it is a call to return now to God.

 

[Jarhead4Jesus]

Concerning the resurrection of Jesus, Judah and Ephraim were not revived, raised up, or living in His sight.
It is more closely related to the restoration of Israel and Judah. The tribulation will be the time of their reviving, which ends with their calling on the Lord and His return to deliver them.

So, it appears that your conclusion is closely related to the 2,000 year prophecy after all.

This can also be realized through a proper interpretation of 'time, times and an half' from Daniel 12:6-7.
An explanation of that can be found here:

https://7049biblicaltimelineresearch.org > Articles > Reconsidering Daniel 12:6-7

 

[JLB]

The timeline is posted at:

https://7049biblicaltimelineresearch.org > Biblical Timelines

Completely open excel file(s) that you can modify however you like. The year cells contain notes which have the scripture references which the running calculations are based on.

The hope is that you'll go to the scriptures to see if these things are true. Let God's word be the judge.

Waiting for you to post God’s word about your timeline so we can judge it to be authentic or not.

 

[Carry_Your_Name]

What disbelief? What spiritualizing? I'm just being rational based on a plain reading and understanding of the text.

The plain reading and understanding of the text is "one day with the Lord for a thousand year", "simile" is your own opinion due to your disbelief in that plain reading and understanding.

 

[Free]

The plain reading and understanding of the text is "one day with the Lord for a thousand year", "simile" is your own opinion due to your disbelief in that plain reading and understanding.

Nope. You're still avoiding the other obvious problem in Psa. 90:4.

 

[Carry_Your_Name]

Nope. You're still avoiding the other obvious problem in Psa. 90:4.

No I'm not, yesterday past is one day, a watch in the night is another way to put it, that much is obvious.

 

[Free]

No I'm not, yesterday past is one day, a watch in the night is another way to put it, that much is obvious.

That makes no sense whatsoever. To say “or as tomorrow which will come” or “or as one day,” are other ways “to put it.” But, absolutely not “or as a watch in the night.” One is 24 hours, one is about 4 hours. One of them contradicts your position and therefore cannot be just “another way to put it.” And both are similes—they’re figures of speech, not equations.