B
blessedsmithereens
Guest
I think they are trying to help educate what refuses to actually accept what has already been written.It seems as though you are not at all following the discussion. Blessedsmithereens first stated: "Besides that, 1 Peter has for years had its critics in the Apologetics community of PhD's ."
I simply asked for clarification as to how that was relevant to the discussion, and for which I still await an answer. Your first link above had nothing to do with the discussion. The second is just a link to a search you did but doesn't bring any clarity to my question. Unless you can read minds or are blessedsmithereens in disguise, you cannot clarify their statement.
Adding that I think it is against the rules to imply someone here is also someone else. Don't do that. It doesn't look good.
No, that's not it.Lol! You mean reason?
Last edited by a moderator: