I disagree. Its obviously talking about Satan. No one else fits all the details.
As I said, I made my case. You don't agree. I won't keep repeating it.
The theory I am reading into the text, is only your opinion which so far, you fail to produce any facts that I have contradicted any detail in the context.
If a picture puzzle appears properly assembled, no pieces forced to fit, it was properly assembled and unfounded denials it was assembled properly, unproved opinion.
You tried to make a case, but it doesn't add up, which is why I disagree.
Looking at Dan 10:13:
Dan 10:13 The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days, but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I was left there with the kings of Persia, (ESV)
Is Satan only "the prince of the kingdom of Persia"? Is he not " the ruler of this world" (John 16:11) and "the prince of the power of the air" (Eph 2:2)?
Dan 10:20 Then he said, “Do you know why I have come to you? But now I will return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I go out, behold, the prince of Greece will come. (ESV)
Is the prince of Greece also Satan? How do you know? It seems quite evident, then, that Dan 10:13 has nothing at all to do with Satan.
Satan is only mentioned three times in the OT outside of Job, which mentions Satan 15 times:
1Ch 21:1 Then Satan stood against Israel and incited David to number Israel. (ESV)
Zec 3:1 Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him.
Zec 3:2 And the LORD said to Satan, “The LORD rebuke you, O Satan! The LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is not this a brand plucked from the fire?” (ESV)
Nowhere in those verses is any sort of description of Satan or what he did before he fell given. We only see some of the actions that he does. The same goes for the NT.
You stated: "Satan looked deep within himself and saw iniquity, he had selfish motives for serving God."
Where is that in Scripture?
"Therefore, God made a terrible mistake believing sentient life would share life with Him in mutual “true love”. As God made a mistake, His own criteria disqualified from being God (Is. 41:21-24)."
I don't know why you want to diminish God's omniscience by saying "God made a terrible mistake." I don't even know what this has to do with Satan.
You stated: 'Satan is more powerful than the Archangel Michael (Dan. 10:13; Jude 1:9), he is called the “anointed cherub” making him “Arch-cherub” among the Cherubim which is the highest order of created beings above seraphim and angels. While the other cherubim carried the throne of God, Satan was its “covering roof” a “canopy over the Throne” (Ez. 28:14).
“Perfect” in his ways until iniquity was found in him, he became prideful about his own beauty (Ez. 28:15, 17; 1 Tim. 3:6) and his wisdom was corrupted (Ez. 28:17), desiring to be worshiped (Isa. 14:13-15; Lk. 4:6-8). Rather than glorify God for his perfections, he became vain in his reasoning.'
Where does the title "Arch-cherub" appear in Scripture? Anointed cherub, or "anointed guardian cherub" (ESV), appears in Eze 28:14, but that is a "lamentation over the king of Tyre" (v. 12):
Eze 28:11 Moreover, the word of the LORD came to me:
Eze 28:12 “Son of man, raise a lamentation over the
king of Tyre, and say to him, Thus says the Lord GOD: “You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
Eze 28:13 You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared.
Eze 28:14 You were an anointed guardian cherub. I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; in the midst of the stones of fire you walked.
Eze 28:15 You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, till unrighteousness was found in you.
Eze 28:16 In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence in your midst, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and I destroyed you, O guardian cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
Eze 28:17 Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you.
Eze 28:18 By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade you profaned your sanctuaries; so I brought fire out from your midst; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you.
Eze 28:19
All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever.” (ESV)
That was fulfilled and done. There is no mention of Satan in that passage.
You stated: 'Satan then “trafficked (Ez. 28:5) his argument angel to angel.'
Really?
Eze 28:1 The word of the LORD came to me:
Eze 28:2 “Son of man, say to the prince of Tyre, Thus says the Lord GOD: “Because your heart is proud, and you have said, ‘I am a god, I sit in the seat of the gods, in the heart of the seas,’ yet you are but a man, and no god, though you make your heart like the heart of a god—
Eze 28:3 you are indeed wiser than Daniel; no secret is hidden from you;
Eze 28:4 by your wisdom and your understanding you have made wealth for yourself, and have gathered gold and silver into your treasuries;
Eze 28:5 by your great wisdom in your trade you have increased your wealth, and your heart has become proud in your wealth— (ESV)
Where is Satan in this passage? Where is Satan shown to be trafficking "his argument angel to angel"?
The central problem is that your entire position is circular. You state that "Its obviously talking about Satan. No one else fits all the details." However, those are the only verses with those particular details and none mentions or hints at Satan. You
must necessarily already have these ideas in your mind about Satan in order to be able to say "Its obviously talking about Satan. No one else fits all the details." That's circular, correct?