TanNinety said:
How can you keep the sabbath and not get dogmatic/legalistic about it?
By doing it in truth.
TN said:
The truth is we can beat each other over up with “how†to keep the law or a commandment, but the easiest way to follow any commandment is to follow the most important rules that Jesus pointed out to us. Love your Father with all your heart and love your neighbor as yourself. If that is taken care of then the rest take care of themselves.
I am of the belief that you must have the "knowledge of Elohim" (Hosea 6:6) to judge how to righteously keep the sabbath (or any grey area of any commandment), and yes, love for Yahweh Elohim is the key. But a mere feeling of emotion does not mean you keep the sabbath by whatever definition of "love" one has.
Rather, when one keeps the sabbath and keeps it in truth, that
is love as you are obeying your heavenly Father.
TN said:
Unless you see the OT in the light of NT you will totally miss the point.
In a sense, yes, and I can see exactly why you would say this. However, you can't fully understand the NT without genuine knowledge of the "old" (I despise that term because the division of the bible into "old" and "new" testaments is a manmade one).
For example, let's take a look at a two NT scriptures:
#1.
Colossians 2:20
Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
Colossians 2:21
(Touch not; taste not; handle not;
Colossians 2:22
Which all are to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
Colossians 2:23
Which things have indeed
a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
#2.
Ephesians 2:15
Having abolished in his flesh
the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
Many believe the Colossians passage is referring to the law [of Moses] and that those trying to obey the law have only an outward show of wisdom. A false wisdom.
Because of traditional Christian teaching, many are seduced into believing this. In Ephesians, many believe that what was abolished was the law of Moses and that it was "enmity" and a tool of hatred that separated Jew from non-Jew.
But is keeping the law only a show of wisdom or is it definite wisdom? Did the law ever separate Jew from non-Jew as "enmity"?
How could you know without knowledge of the Tanakc? What does it say?
Deuteronomy 4:5
Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even as יהוה my Elohim commanded me, that ye should do so in the land whither ye go to possess it.
Deuteronomy 4:6
Keep therefore and do them; for
this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.
Deuteronomy 4:7
For what nation is there so great, who hath Elohim so nigh unto them, as יהוה our Elohim is in all things that we call upon him for?
Deuteronomy 4:8
And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as
all this law, which I set before you this day?
Isaiah 56:3
Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to יהוה, speak, saying, יהוה hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree
I could cite many more scriptures (but for sake of time). These scriptures tell us that keeping the law
is wisdom, and that the nations were supposed to see it and glorify Yahweh. It is not "enmity" between Israelite and non-Israelite. It brought them together for a common purpose (to glorify the one Elohim). And as we can see from Isaiah also, strangers (aliens/non-Israelites) were not excluded from being part of the "commonwealth of Israel" (Ephesians 2:12).
One who does not have some type of grounding in the original scriptures, or the Tanakc, and has been taught all their life by listening to their preacher in church with his nose stuck in the NT that the law is all these horrible, "ceremonial" and detestable "Jewish" things, will not be able to interpret these NT scriptures correctly.
In light of these scriptures, Ephesians and Colossians in this instance must be looked at in a different way. You can't say these NT scriptures clarify or expound upon the original ones. They, if the law is indeed the subject of those NT passages, are in
direct conflict with the original scriptures.
TN said:
For example adultery, OT the act has to be omitted, NT even the thought of lust has to be omitted.
When Christ said that, he was giving the true intent of the original (that is what it means rabbinically, as he was a rabbi, to "fulfill" the scripture; many believers wrongly believe today that to "fulfill" the law means to do it and keep it perfectly so we don't have to).
TN said:
When you enter into this rest in Jesus Christ you enter into this place of rest. You understand what sabbath is really about. When you begin to set aside your whole life for the heavenly Father then you keep the sabbath.
Well, I must have scripture.
TN said:
Below is the post by JM which expresses my views.
Heb 3:18 And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not?
Heb 4:11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
What rest is that?
Heb 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
I disagree with JM's interpretation here for reasons stated in a thread I just made before I responded to this post. Anyway, we can discuss more on this if you wish.
These types of conversations can get heated. Let's try to keep it smooth.