Greetings again Free,
Are you saying that God created God the Son at his conception/birth? Or are you claiming that the Father/Son relationship goes back to eternity, and how is this a Father/Son relationship? Seems more like two Gods, or two Brothers. Did the Father precede the Son in any way, and is he superior to the Son? What does it mean that Jesus is the Only Begotten of the Father John 1:14? For example, you been on this 37 page repetitious thread from page 1 and you claim there the following:
Kind regards
Trevor
I could give an answer to most passages, but I prefer to concentrate on a few, especially those that I have developed what I consider a reasonably clear explanation.I'm not surprised. No anti-Trinitarian ever does address those passages which prove too difficult for their position.
Almost an amusing comment, but I consider the Notes for our 3 levels Junior, intermediate and Senior x 5 years for each level, thus covering from say 4y.o. to 18y.o. to be excellent guides to the Bible teaching, both the stories and the doctrines. Many 18y.o's are then ready for baptism. I also treasure the years that I have spent in the Senior Adult Class.I guess that explains it, doesn't it? Don't believe everything you were taught in Sunday School.
The Yahweh Name encompasses what God the Father would accomplish and become. This has resulted in the birth, ministry and sacrifice of Jesus, that is salvation in and through Jesus.What name is that and how does it show the above?
That's why I keep on quoting Psalm 110:1 and Jesus' use of this in Revelation 3:21. I suggest that Trinitarians do not like Psalm 110:1 which is the most quoted and expounded OT reference in the NT.That's begging the question. This is why I keep asking for a verse that shows Yahweh is the Father only.
I believe in the return of Jesus to sit upon the Temple Throne of David in Jerusalem for 1000 years.It might be worth bearing in mind that believers, as a whole, are the new temple of God, with Jesus in us through the Holy Spirit. The above verses may not be speaking of a literal temple in Jerusalem.
The whole concept of two natures, a human portion that is lacking in knowledge and needing to grow in wisdom and a Divine portion that is all-knowing and all-wise, a weak frail human being subject to death and a Divine Being (whoops - Person) all powerful, immortal, etc., etc.How exactly is the concept "both impossible and contradictory"? Saying it is doesn't make it so, especially since the Bible makes it clear that that is the case.
Were the KJV translators incorrect when they added "he" in John 8:24, 8:28 and 9:9. Jesus was in the plan and purpose of God Genesis 3:15 before Abraham came on the scene.On what basis? First, "he" isn't in the Greek, so we can't just go arbitrarily adding it into the English. Second, it makes no sense in the context. Jesus is contrasting Abraham's existence with his--Abraham's is temporal and finite; Jesus's is absolute existence.
I have explained my understanding on the Yahweh Name, "He will be/become".And that makes little sense in the context as well. "I Will Be" doesn't communicate a whole lot about God; it's rather nebulous and abstract. "I Am," on the other hand, immediately gives a number of concrete attributes of God, and that he can therefore be absolutely trusted.
My understanding and experience of a father/son relationship is that my father preceded me and ultimately caused me to be conceived and born when he was 31 years old. I also have four children, two sons and two daughters, and they did not exist before I was married. But you claim that Jesus had two natures when he was born, so are you denying now that Jesus had God as his father in the conception/birth process, but that this particular father/son occurrence and relationship necessitated that Jesus only had the Divine Nature?Are you disagreeing that a son is always the same nature as his father? If it's different for Jesus, then the language of Father and Son is meaningless and communicates nothing to us. That would be odd since it is used throughout the NT. God is the original; humans are the analogies. Since we know that sons are always the same nature as their fathers, it follows that the Son must also be the same nature as the Father.
Are you saying that God created God the Son at his conception/birth? Or are you claiming that the Father/Son relationship goes back to eternity, and how is this a Father/Son relationship? Seems more like two Gods, or two Brothers. Did the Father precede the Son in any way, and is he superior to the Son? What does it mean that Jesus is the Only Begotten of the Father John 1:14? For example, you been on this 37 page repetitious thread from page 1 and you claim there the following:
If the Father, the Son have each always existed as fully and truly God, where is there a true father/son relationship?Except that the doctrine of the Trinity is quite different than what you have stated. Basically stated, it is that within the one being that is God, there exists three coeternal, coequal persons.
That is, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit have each always existed as fully and truly God, yet, the Father isn’t the Son, and neither are the Holy Spirit. All of the same essence but distinct one from the other.
Jesus was a human specially prepared, the Son of God by birth, character and resurrection and he is the captain of our salvation.On the contrary, if Jesus was only just a man, even a "very unique and special man," then at most he secured his salvation and the forgiveness of the sins of his followers at that time, for a limited period of time. If Jesus isn't also truly God, there is no salvation.
Kind regards
Trevor