R
Rocksolid
Guest
Gabriel Ali said:If I were to claim that "Muslims are polytheists and that they are consciously lying when they claim to be monotheists" I would not then deny this in my very next post.
You said "the 'one god' claim is what is used to proselytize Christians and Jews." That one statement alone implies that Islam is polytheistic and that Mohammedans are lying for the purpose of converting monotheists. Then you add, "When Muslims come to this board and twist their own scripture to make it more palatable for the Christians I tackle their lies head-on." That confirms what was previously implied about Islam being polytheist and Mohammedans lying about it. I'm relieved that you don't believe that Islam is polytheistic, but much of what you've said seems to amount to claiming that they are polytheistic.
The Mohammedans believe that word Allah is related to Elohim and that Allah is the God of Abraham. They may be mistaken, but I don't see how that makes a difference. The Qur-an was written by someone who wanted to start his own Bible spin-off religion. He was not trying to start a new moon-god cult.
LOL. I've been called many things; bigot, Islamophobe, racist (ridiculous considering my race) but never anti-Semitic. If you think I'm going to answer your question (a question originally claimed to be asked "Just out of curiosity") when I know next-to-nothing about the subject, you are wrong and accusing me of anti-Semitism is not going to change that.
Islamophobe=antisemite because Islam is semitic. But, I'm not calling your an Islamophobe (a silly term).
I asked about the god of the Talmud. I ask because I want you to shed some light on your reasoning about what makes a god the God of Abraham. Is the god of the Talmud the God of Abraham? If it is, is it for any other reason than it claims to be? If the reason is that it claims to be, why is that reason not good enough for the Qur-an?
I have no reason to doubt you're a generally honest person, but I do not find it credible that you do not have enough knowledge of the Talmud to comment on it, even on this most basic issue - all the more so given the special interest you've shown on the subject . I expected you not to answer because I suspect that your attacks on Islam is just about bashing for the sake of bashing. You stomp you feet and say the origin of the Allah is important, but you give us no reason to believe it's important other than your own judgement which begs the question of your objectivity. As such, your point is being lost on me.