Politico
Member
Gender Fluidity, the real definition: I believe it; therefore, it must be so. Everyone else had better conform.
If transgenderism is allowed to take root, politically and socially, then it will lead to allowing biological males using the girl's locker rooms in schools. If that occurs, then the logical progression indicates it will be extended to showers, in schools and elsewhere, such as shower rooms in privately-owned gyms. I heard on the news a while back that a certain school in California has sanctioned transgenders using the locker room of their choice.
The Obama administration issued a directive to schools requiring an allowance of transgenders to use not only bathroom facilities, but also locker room facilities of their choice. Of course this means allowing biological, naked males sharing the girl's locker rooms with people's daughters and vice-versa. Can we say that only a fool could sanction such a thing? I think so.
A multiple-State lawsuit, headed by the state of Texas, has challenged Obama's directive. I am not sure how that has gone so far.
Transgenderism is a part of an overall worldview that gives minimal regard to the significance of a person's DNA and gives preference to the comfort and “rights” of the queer community over those of the rest of the population in America. Transgenders compose only a small, small fraction of the population of America. So why is their so-called "rights" being given preference over the rights of non-transgenders by so many liberals and moderates?
Do I not have the right to use the men's restroom without a woman-pretending-to-be-a man standing right next to me? What about a woman needing to change her clothes when she notices a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman standing next to her? Many men's restrooms have the urinals situated right beside or across a mirror. So, as a man, I am standing there trying to use the urinals when a woman-pretending-to-be-a-man walks in and is using the mirror. She is standing right behind me. So what about my right to feel comfortable when trying to relieve myself? What about my right to use the facilities without someone of the opposite sex standing right beside me or behind me?
This is not just about trannys using the restroom of their choice, this also about the queer community demanding that federal and state governments put their official seal of moral approval on the lifestyle and philosophy known as transgenderism by passing laws that give preference to the comfort level and “rights” of trannys over those rights and comfort of the vast majority of people living in the US.
What about the real woman who spills something on her blouse and needs to use the bathroom to clean off her blouse, which may entail the need for her to take it off to clean it? Now how can she do that with a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman standing right next to her using the mirror? What about the real woman's right to privacy and the right to relieve herself (with all of its attending bodily noises) without being humiliated knowing that a man is in the next stall listening to every noise the real women makes? The issues related to transgenderism concerns not only whether or not healthy individuals should foster delusion, but also concerns the morally-bankrupt decision to prefer the “rights” and comfort level of the queer community over the rest of America’s population. Conservatives must do what they can to stop this assault on individual privacy rights.
There are so many terrible ramifications in condoning transgenderism. It leads to such confusion and contradiction. For example, in a scenario where there are only so many lifeboats on a sinking ship for the women and children (the men staying behind), if there is a man pretending to be a woman on this ship that's going down, is he to be treated like the women and allowed on the lifeboats along with other women? What if there is only enough room on the last lifeboat for one more woman, yet there remains on the ship one biological woman and one man pretending to be a woman? Who gets the seat? If it is given to the "transgender," and this transgender later switches back to preferring his biological gender, then will anyone be upset that a man was given the last seat and a real woman was forced to go down with the ship? This is just one of many thought exercises that demonstrate the contradictory and abominable ramifications of legitimizing transgenderism.
Transgenderism and its accommodation must be fought at every level, primarily through Prayer.
If transgenderism is allowed to take root, politically and socially, then it will lead to allowing biological males using the girl's locker rooms in schools. If that occurs, then the logical progression indicates it will be extended to showers, in schools and elsewhere, such as shower rooms in privately-owned gyms. I heard on the news a while back that a certain school in California has sanctioned transgenders using the locker room of their choice.
The Obama administration issued a directive to schools requiring an allowance of transgenders to use not only bathroom facilities, but also locker room facilities of their choice. Of course this means allowing biological, naked males sharing the girl's locker rooms with people's daughters and vice-versa. Can we say that only a fool could sanction such a thing? I think so.
A multiple-State lawsuit, headed by the state of Texas, has challenged Obama's directive. I am not sure how that has gone so far.
Transgenderism is a part of an overall worldview that gives minimal regard to the significance of a person's DNA and gives preference to the comfort and “rights” of the queer community over those of the rest of the population in America. Transgenders compose only a small, small fraction of the population of America. So why is their so-called "rights" being given preference over the rights of non-transgenders by so many liberals and moderates?
Do I not have the right to use the men's restroom without a woman-pretending-to-be-a man standing right next to me? What about a woman needing to change her clothes when she notices a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman standing next to her? Many men's restrooms have the urinals situated right beside or across a mirror. So, as a man, I am standing there trying to use the urinals when a woman-pretending-to-be-a-man walks in and is using the mirror. She is standing right behind me. So what about my right to feel comfortable when trying to relieve myself? What about my right to use the facilities without someone of the opposite sex standing right beside me or behind me?
This is not just about trannys using the restroom of their choice, this also about the queer community demanding that federal and state governments put their official seal of moral approval on the lifestyle and philosophy known as transgenderism by passing laws that give preference to the comfort level and “rights” of trannys over those rights and comfort of the vast majority of people living in the US.
What about the real woman who spills something on her blouse and needs to use the bathroom to clean off her blouse, which may entail the need for her to take it off to clean it? Now how can she do that with a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman standing right next to her using the mirror? What about the real woman's right to privacy and the right to relieve herself (with all of its attending bodily noises) without being humiliated knowing that a man is in the next stall listening to every noise the real women makes? The issues related to transgenderism concerns not only whether or not healthy individuals should foster delusion, but also concerns the morally-bankrupt decision to prefer the “rights” and comfort level of the queer community over the rest of America’s population. Conservatives must do what they can to stop this assault on individual privacy rights.
There are so many terrible ramifications in condoning transgenderism. It leads to such confusion and contradiction. For example, in a scenario where there are only so many lifeboats on a sinking ship for the women and children (the men staying behind), if there is a man pretending to be a woman on this ship that's going down, is he to be treated like the women and allowed on the lifeboats along with other women? What if there is only enough room on the last lifeboat for one more woman, yet there remains on the ship one biological woman and one man pretending to be a woman? Who gets the seat? If it is given to the "transgender," and this transgender later switches back to preferring his biological gender, then will anyone be upset that a man was given the last seat and a real woman was forced to go down with the ship? This is just one of many thought exercises that demonstrate the contradictory and abominable ramifications of legitimizing transgenderism.
Transgenderism and its accommodation must be fought at every level, primarily through Prayer.
