Q
Qasim786
Guest
"Where in the Bible actually does it tell us Jesus is not the son of God?..."
Qasim Said:I did not say that the bible doesnt say Jesus is the son of God. What i was trying to say was that does not mean that we should worship him, or that he has a specail link with God that no other man can have, the way the Christians like to think. Because God has many sons in the bible. What do you say about all of those others that are also Gods sons, according to the bible. So then you tell me, 'well Jesus is different, he is begotten', but then what do you REALLY mean when you say the Jesus is the only begotten son of God. I know that you mean only in the spirtual sense but then why is that different to the other sons of God in the bible?
As stated many times before, 'Son of God' in the bible is not unsusual, or specific to Jesus (peace be upon him).
"...Adam, which was the son of God." (Luke 3:38)
"...Israel is My son, even My firstborn:" (Exodus 4:22)
"...for I (God) am a Father to Israel, and Ephraim is My firstborn." (Jeremiah 31:9)
"...the Lord hath said unto me (David): 'Thou art My son: this day have I begotten thee." (Psalms 2:7)
"For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." (Romans 18:14)
"Behold, a son shall be born to thee, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about: for his name shall be Solomon, and I will give peace and quietness unto Israel in his days.
He shall build an house for my name; and he shall be my son, and I will be his father; and I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel for ever."
(1 Chronicles 22:10), (also 1 Chronicles 28:6)
As you can see God has many sons in the Bible, it meant nothing more that a righteous servant of God.
Nicolaj said:Some Muslims say...because the bible is corrupt and man as changed it to look that way...though you are saying the Bible says he is not......
If you think because of prophets, people call God father in the Bible...means that Jesus is not....that is no proof....only your intereptation of it....
Qasim said:Im sorry, what is your point here. When Jesus addresses his disciples in, he says our father and your father first, and then says my father later on. Take a look especially at Matthew 6:1 onwards. God here is not just 'my father' but is 'our father' and 'your father', the Father or everyone, metaphorically.
"You have no proof like I have none...I have ony my faith he is...with the words he spoke... "
'Where in the Bible does it state another prophet was coming to show us the true way after Jesus left/died whatever? '
Qasim said:Many places. Actually theres one that strike me as it cleary shows that the Jews were awaiting for a prophet other that THE christ.
From http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... ch6_1.html:
"In the Bible we read of the test that the Jews applied to Jesus (pbuh) in order to ascertain his truthfulness. The Jews had a prophecy that required Elias to come before Jesus (pbuh):
"Elias verily cometh first"
Mark 9:12
(also John 3:28). They had not seen Elias yet so they doubted the claim of Jesus (pbuh). Jesus, however, responded to them that Elias had already come but that they did not recognize him. In Matthew we read:
"But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not.........Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."
Matthew 17:12-13
John, however refutes the claims of Jesus (pbuh). This is one of the Christian's "dark sayings of Jesus" that their scholars have tried to reconcile for centuries. We will leave this matter for them to work out among themselves (This matter is resolved in the Gospel of Barnabas. Please see chapter 7 for more).
Now, in John we read
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No."
John 1:19-21
We notice that there are three distinct prophecies here: 1) Elias, 2) Jesus, 3) That prophet. The Jews were not waiting for two prophecies, but three. This can be further clarified by reading John:
"And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be:
a) not that Christ,
b) nor Elias,
c) neither that prophet?"
John 1:25
If "that prophet" were Jesus (pbuh) wouldn't the third question in both verses be redundant? Further, we must remember that "That prophet" can not apply to any prophet before the time of Jesus (pbuh) because at the time of Jesus (pbuh) the Jews were still waiting for all three. Notice how when we let the Bible speak for itself, without forcing the holy spirit or other supernatural meanings on it in the commentary, or forcing three questions to be only two, how clear these verses become. For much more evidence in this regard, please read chapter 7 regarding the Dead Sea Scroll prophesies of "two messiahs" and how the Jews who wrote the scrolls and who were waiting for the coming of Jesus (pbuh) clearly state in these scrolls that they were waiting for not one, but TWO messiahs, the first of which would be announced by an eschatological prophet."
Taken from http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... ch6_1.html
Why would we need another covenent with God... (the Koran) so soon after Jesus gave himself up for our sins? Muslims don't believe Jesus died at all on the cross....do they...?
Qasim said:Well we do not believe that Jesus came to die for the sins of Humanity, because we reject the concept of Original Sin, where we can inherit sin. We believe that each human being is born sinless, and only later changes. We believe Jesus came to teach the Jews about Mercy and Forgiveness as they had become a very heard-hearted people who had forgotten how to forgive. He came to Guide the Children Of Israel. That was his mission.
Do Muslims think his death was staged......what reason do Muslims believe Jesus came for?....
Qasim said:Jesus' mission was for the Jews only. His death was not staged, but we believe he was saved by God, and the Jews thought they had killed him, but it had only appeared to them that they had. In reality he had niether been killed, nor crucified. I know this is very hard for you to accept because you believe this is why he came, to die for you, but when you see and understand the true mission of Jesus, we realize this was an act of love from God, to save his messenger from being killed. Also, Jesus' mission was for the Jews only. This can be seen from the following verses:
Matthew10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Here Jesus is commanding his disciples to not go to the gentiles, but only to the Children of Israel, the Jews.
Matthew 15:22-27 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
23But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
25Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
26But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
27And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Qasim said: Although Jesus did help the woman in the end, it is quite clear that Jesus was not sent, but to the Children of Israel.
'What do you think is so wrong with Chrisitianity that God so quickly his mind and now wanted the new religion to be Islam..'
Qasim Said: Islam is not a new religion. Islam means 'submission to the will of God', it is nothing new and was preached by all prophets, including Jesus. The reality is that Christianity was not preached by Jesus, nor does the word Christianity occur in the bible, even the word Christian is never used by Jesus or his close disciples. I think the word only occurs 2 or 3 times in the New Testament. The major part of the preaching of 'Christianity' Should be acredited to Paul, the 'apostle' of Christ. Jesus taught to pray to 'the Father' or God, not to pray to Jesus. He did not come with a new religion or set of laws, but he followed the divine law that had been given to Moses, and the message he preached was the same as every other preceding prophet before him, which was Submission to Gods will.
John 20:17 "...Go to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to MY Father and YOUR Father, to MY God and YOUR God.' "
Qasim Said:I did not say that the bible doesnt say Jesus is the son of God. What i was trying to say was that does not mean that we should worship him, or that he has a specail link with God that no other man can have, the way the Christians like to think. Because God has many sons in the bible. What do you say about all of those others that are also Gods sons, according to the bible. So then you tell me, 'well Jesus is different, he is begotten', but then what do you REALLY mean when you say the Jesus is the only begotten son of God. I know that you mean only in the spirtual sense but then why is that different to the other sons of God in the bible?
As stated many times before, 'Son of God' in the bible is not unsusual, or specific to Jesus (peace be upon him).
"...Adam, which was the son of God." (Luke 3:38)
"...Israel is My son, even My firstborn:" (Exodus 4:22)
"...for I (God) am a Father to Israel, and Ephraim is My firstborn." (Jeremiah 31:9)
"...the Lord hath said unto me (David): 'Thou art My son: this day have I begotten thee." (Psalms 2:7)
"For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." (Romans 18:14)
"Behold, a son shall be born to thee, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about: for his name shall be Solomon, and I will give peace and quietness unto Israel in his days.
He shall build an house for my name; and he shall be my son, and I will be his father; and I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel for ever."
(1 Chronicles 22:10), (also 1 Chronicles 28:6)
As you can see God has many sons in the Bible, it meant nothing more that a righteous servant of God.
Nicolaj said:Some Muslims say...because the bible is corrupt and man as changed it to look that way...though you are saying the Bible says he is not......
If you think because of prophets, people call God father in the Bible...means that Jesus is not....that is no proof....only your intereptation of it....
Qasim said:Im sorry, what is your point here. When Jesus addresses his disciples in, he says our father and your father first, and then says my father later on. Take a look especially at Matthew 6:1 onwards. God here is not just 'my father' but is 'our father' and 'your father', the Father or everyone, metaphorically.
"You have no proof like I have none...I have ony my faith he is...with the words he spoke... "
'Where in the Bible does it state another prophet was coming to show us the true way after Jesus left/died whatever? '
Qasim said:Many places. Actually theres one that strike me as it cleary shows that the Jews were awaiting for a prophet other that THE christ.
From http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... ch6_1.html:
"In the Bible we read of the test that the Jews applied to Jesus (pbuh) in order to ascertain his truthfulness. The Jews had a prophecy that required Elias to come before Jesus (pbuh):
"Elias verily cometh first"
Mark 9:12
(also John 3:28). They had not seen Elias yet so they doubted the claim of Jesus (pbuh). Jesus, however, responded to them that Elias had already come but that they did not recognize him. In Matthew we read:
"But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not.........Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."
Matthew 17:12-13
John, however refutes the claims of Jesus (pbuh). This is one of the Christian's "dark sayings of Jesus" that their scholars have tried to reconcile for centuries. We will leave this matter for them to work out among themselves (This matter is resolved in the Gospel of Barnabas. Please see chapter 7 for more).
Now, in John we read
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No."
John 1:19-21
We notice that there are three distinct prophecies here: 1) Elias, 2) Jesus, 3) That prophet. The Jews were not waiting for two prophecies, but three. This can be further clarified by reading John:
"And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be:
a) not that Christ,
b) nor Elias,
c) neither that prophet?"
John 1:25
If "that prophet" were Jesus (pbuh) wouldn't the third question in both verses be redundant? Further, we must remember that "That prophet" can not apply to any prophet before the time of Jesus (pbuh) because at the time of Jesus (pbuh) the Jews were still waiting for all three. Notice how when we let the Bible speak for itself, without forcing the holy spirit or other supernatural meanings on it in the commentary, or forcing three questions to be only two, how clear these verses become. For much more evidence in this regard, please read chapter 7 regarding the Dead Sea Scroll prophesies of "two messiahs" and how the Jews who wrote the scrolls and who were waiting for the coming of Jesus (pbuh) clearly state in these scrolls that they were waiting for not one, but TWO messiahs, the first of which would be announced by an eschatological prophet."
Taken from http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... ch6_1.html
Why would we need another covenent with God... (the Koran) so soon after Jesus gave himself up for our sins? Muslims don't believe Jesus died at all on the cross....do they...?
Qasim said:Well we do not believe that Jesus came to die for the sins of Humanity, because we reject the concept of Original Sin, where we can inherit sin. We believe that each human being is born sinless, and only later changes. We believe Jesus came to teach the Jews about Mercy and Forgiveness as they had become a very heard-hearted people who had forgotten how to forgive. He came to Guide the Children Of Israel. That was his mission.
Do Muslims think his death was staged......what reason do Muslims believe Jesus came for?....
Qasim said:Jesus' mission was for the Jews only. His death was not staged, but we believe he was saved by God, and the Jews thought they had killed him, but it had only appeared to them that they had. In reality he had niether been killed, nor crucified. I know this is very hard for you to accept because you believe this is why he came, to die for you, but when you see and understand the true mission of Jesus, we realize this was an act of love from God, to save his messenger from being killed. Also, Jesus' mission was for the Jews only. This can be seen from the following verses:
Matthew10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Here Jesus is commanding his disciples to not go to the gentiles, but only to the Children of Israel, the Jews.
Matthew 15:22-27 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
23But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
25Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
26But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
27And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Qasim said: Although Jesus did help the woman in the end, it is quite clear that Jesus was not sent, but to the Children of Israel.
'What do you think is so wrong with Chrisitianity that God so quickly his mind and now wanted the new religion to be Islam..'
Qasim Said: Islam is not a new religion. Islam means 'submission to the will of God', it is nothing new and was preached by all prophets, including Jesus. The reality is that Christianity was not preached by Jesus, nor does the word Christianity occur in the bible, even the word Christian is never used by Jesus or his close disciples. I think the word only occurs 2 or 3 times in the New Testament. The major part of the preaching of 'Christianity' Should be acredited to Paul, the 'apostle' of Christ. Jesus taught to pray to 'the Father' or God, not to pray to Jesus. He did not come with a new religion or set of laws, but he followed the divine law that had been given to Moses, and the message he preached was the same as every other preceding prophet before him, which was Submission to Gods will.
John 20:17 "...Go to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to MY Father and YOUR Father, to MY God and YOUR God.' "