BrenchStevens
Member
As the title to this thread may suggest, I am inquiring about the definition of person.
What is a person?
What is a person?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
A person is a sentient being as opposed to a thing.
So, a person is merely a being that is able to perceive or feel? A person is a being that has an awareness?
That is my perspective on it, however the word "feeling" is more attributed to emotion or spirit rather than only pain and pleasure. Self awarenes is more a philosophical term but a valid indicator of a person. Defining self aware is another matter.
What is a soul? From the word Nephesh meaning to have breath, wherein God breathed into dirt and man became a living soul.
Another indicator is to what we attribute the proper nouns "He" or "she" as opposed to "it".
Merely running with your definition, however, a robot with artificial intelligence would in fact be a person.
I did not mention "self" awareness, but awareness only, running with your usage of the word "sentient," which means, according to Oxford English Dictionaries online, "able to perceive or feel things," which could be called an awareness. But, can I safely infer that you are not requiring an awareness of self in your definition of person?
I do not see how a discussion of what the soul is matters here, or what pronouns ("he," "she," and "it" are pronouns) we apply to persons.
Nevertheless, according to your definition of person, the term identifies a sentient being, which would be a being that is able to perceive or feel things. This definition does not require an awareness of self.
As the title to this thread may suggest, I am inquiring about the definition of person.
What is a person?
This is very easy. According to Dr. Seuss A person's a person, no matter how small. This was famously illustrated in his ground breaking book, Horton Hears a Who!
I tend to agree. a person, as in a human being, is in fact a person no matter how small, and that process starts when a sperm from the male fertilizes an egg from a female. From that point on the cells divide and grow with an average total life expectancy of about 84 years by today's measures. ....and there you have it. A person.
This is usually taught in most 8th grade biology classes.
So in your definition the term "person" refers solely to human beings? How does this incorporate into your understanding of God's personhood?
No! see your not listening. I said..."I tend to agree. a person, as in a human being,...............Now your wanting to speak of the personhood of God, or as in the spiritual person? Where is our spirit? is that it?
We can talk about that I guess, but clarify which it is. I am answering your question in the physical sense of "What is a Person?"
Sorry to drag you here Danus, but my dog is a person in my estimation.
Danus, I am not talking about human beings specifically or God's personhood specifically. I am asking what a person is. What is a person? What constitutes as a person? What requirements must be met for something to qualify as a person?
childeye, I did not realize that you denied my conclusion that your terms indicate personhood for an artificially intelligent robot. It was not apparent in your response. Why do you deny such?
Danus, I am not talking about human beings specifically or God's personhood specifically. I am asking what a person is. What is a person? What constitutes as a person? What requirements must be met for something to qualify as a person?
Nice analogy.=Danus;615189]Well, that's like asking what is the color blue.
Actually, Danus I take issue with your declining to count animals as persons, although I agree they are not equal to men in station. God is above us in station and yet he likens us to sheep that have all gone astray, and we are all accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Still He recognizes us as persons.We live in a time where that is a popular thing to do in order to justify and further define man made morality, such as the killing of persons yet born or the rights of Dogs and cats as equals to man.
I take issue with your declining to count animals as persons, although I agree they are not equal to men in station. God is above us in station and yet he likens us to sheep that have all gone astray, and we are all accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Still He recognizes us as persons.
Isaiah 66:2-3
New International Version (NIV)
2 Has not my hand made all these things,
and so they came into being?â€
declares the LORD. “These are the ones I look on with favor:
those who are humble and contrite in spirit,
and who tremble at my word.
3 But whoever sacrifices a bull
is like one who kills a person,
Yes let's tackle this scripture, I agree it is about meaningless sacrifice. I agree with your context that God is talking about a worthless sacrifice and even one that does not have the power to change a man's heart such as the Christ is able to do. That is even why God says it is like he is killing a person. And there is no getting around it, the scripture says "person" and some translations say "man". Nevertheless it is about comparing the worth of a bull with a person. Only because the person sacrificing disregards the life, and therefore the person being sacrificed. That's why the blood of the offering is not to be burned with the flesh, nor eaten. Because the blood is given by God as an atonement. Read the above verse 2. It says that by God's hands all was made. That life belonged to God.=Danus;615233]Let's tackle this scripture first. What 66:3 is referring to are ineffective sacrifices for the sake of simply sacrificing as am empty ritual. Let's add a little more for context.
and whoever offers a lamb
is like one who breaks a dog’s neck;
whoever makes a grain offering
is like one who presents pig’s blood,
and whoever burns memorial incense
is like one who worships an idol.
They have chosen their own ways,
and they delight in their abominations;
4 so I also will choose harsh treatment for them
and will bring on them what they dread.
For when I called, no one answered,
when I spoke, no one listened.
They did evil in my sight
and chose what displeases me.”
God is not speaking out against the killing of a bull, but for the meaningless in the sacrifice one might make in that act alone.
Of course we are a higher station of species, but what if I told you that to count a lower life as expendable for your mistakes was Satanic in nature; who not only had no regard for us because he was higher than us, but consequently by the same spirit of vanity longed to even be higher than he was.Clearly the bible makes a distinction between man and the rest of the animal kingdom. Man is set apart and elevated. Animalkind are not equal to mankind, so if we are going to tie the title of "Person" to mankind, then we would be minimizing that to include animals as well.
This is a good attitude to take. I'm just saying what the love in me says. That my dog is a person and I treat her as such. She has feelings and she returns love too.This is not to say that animals should not be treated with an amount of reverence and respect. They are God's creatures, but we have dominion over them. We eat them, we wear their skins, we make useful products from them and God clearly sanctions this within the pale of respect not only for his creations, but also the proper care and concern for the resource animals are.
Don't be silly, respectfully, you end up sounding pretentious. God forgive my cynicism. God likened men to animals all the time. We are counted as sheep for the slaughter. Hard to forget that one. We are all living sacrifices when we walk in Love but the life belonged to God.So, no. Animals are not "persons" and I'd caution anyone in thinking they are, or defining them in the same way we define mankind.
The term person does not mean a man anymore than a person means God. Let us make man in our image does not automatically conclude a man could not be made in God's image and consequently cease to be a man. Scripture doesn't say let's make an image of ourselves and call it man. It's as if the last animal they made they decided to make in their image. Christ is a man yet he is sent in the person of God.What qualifies a person to be a person? I suppose you might want to define what a person is.
Here is a non-religious definition, dicationary.com:
per·son [pur-suhn] Show IPA
noun
1.
a human being, whether man, woman, or child: The table seats four persons.
2.
a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.
3.
Sociology . an individual human being, especially with reference to his or her social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned by the culture.
4.
Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being.
5.
the actual self or individual personality of a human being: You ought not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with.
I would say a person is one who was created in the image of God. Animals were not created in the image of God. People have characteristics that God contains in perfection. We have a will, we know right from wrong. This works well when describing the three Persons of the Trinity, though the Christian would say the Trinity is in unity.
Genesis 1:26
New King James Version (NKJV)
26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;...
- Davies