-
-
Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
-
-
-
Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
-
-
What is all the Bible about?
- Thread starter JLGJLG
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #422
- That's the Hebrew name God wants to be called meaning the God of the promise or of the promises!
- If you look at the verses in Biblehub, when it is said the Lord they put Yah.weh in parenthesis!
- But the majority of the translations have erased it completely!
- What a shame!
Exodus 3:15
THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER AND THIS IS HOW I AM TO BE REMEMBERED IN EVERY GENERATION
God
אֱלֹהִ֜ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
also
ע֨וֹד (‘ō·wḏ)
Adverb
Strong's 5750: Iteration, continuance, again, repeatedly, still, more
told
וַיֹּאמֶר֩ (way·yō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say
Moses,
מֹשֶׁ֗ה (mō·šeh)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 4872: Moses -- a great Israelite leader, prophet and lawgiver
“Say
תֹאמַר֮ (ṯō·mar)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say
to
אֶל־ (’el-)
Preposition
Strong's 413: Near, with, among, to
the Israelites,
בְּנֵ֣י (bə·nê)
Noun - masculine plural construct
Strong's 1121: A son
‘The LORD,
יְהוָ֞ה (Yah·weh)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 3068: LORD -- the proper name of the God of Israel
the God
אֱלֹהֵ֣י (’ĕ·lō·hê)
Noun - masculine plural construct
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
of your fathers—
אֲבֹתֵיכֶ֗ם (’ă·ḇō·ṯê·ḵem)
Noun - masculine plural construct | second person masculine plural
Strong's 1: Father
the God
אֱלֹהֵ֨י (’ĕ·lō·hê)
Noun - masculine plural construct
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
of Abraham,
אַבְרָהָ֜ם (’aḇ·rā·hām)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 85: Abraham -- 'exalted father', the father of the Jewish nation
the God
אֱלֹהֵ֥י (’ĕ·lō·hê)
Noun - masculine plural construct
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
of Isaac,
יִצְחָ֛ק (yiṣ·ḥāq)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 3327: Isaac -- 'he laughs', son of Abraham and Sarah
and the God
וֵאלֹהֵ֥י (wê·lō·hê)
Conjunctive waw | Noun - masculine plural construct
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
of Jacob—
יַעֲקֹ֖ב (ya·‘ă·qōḇ)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 3290: Jacob -- a son of Isaac, also his desc
has sent
שְׁלָחַ֣נִי (šə·lā·ḥa·nî)
Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular | first person common singular
Strong's 7971: To send away, for, out
me to you.’
אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם (’ă·lê·ḵem)
Preposition | second person masculine plural
Strong's 413: Near, with, among, to
This
זֶה־ (zeh-)
Pronoun - masculine singular
Strong's 2088: This, that
is My name
שְּׁמִ֣י (šə·mî)
Noun - masculine singular construct | first person common singular
Strong's 8034: A name
forever,
לְעֹלָ֔ם (lə·‘ō·lām)
Preposition-l | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 5769: Concealed, eternity, frequentatively, always
and this
וְזֶ֥ה (wə·zeh)
Conjunctive waw | Pronoun - masculine singular
Strong's 2088: This, that
is how I am to be remembered
זִכְרִ֖י (ziḵ·rî)
Noun - masculine singular construct | first person common singular
Strong's 2143: A memento, recollection, commemoration
in every generation.
לְדֹ֥ר (lə·ḏōr)
Preposition-l | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 1755: A revolution of time, an age, generation, a dwelling
You are correct.
But since trins are triune God believers, their god is a false god.
blessings.
- Thread starter
- #424
- Corruption spread everywhere!
How Ancient Trinitarian Gods Influenced Adoption of the Trinity
Many who believe in the Trinity are surprised, perhaps shocked, to learn that the idea of divine beings existing as trinities or triads long predated Christianity. Yet, as we will see, the evidence is abundantly documented.
www.ucg.org
- The triad of Sumeria!
-The triad of Babylonia!
- The triad of India!
- The trinity of Greece!
- The trinity of Egypt!
- The trinity of Phoenicia!
- The trinity of Rome!
- The Germanic trinity!
- The trinity of the celts!
- The trinity of Egypt!
How Ancient Trinitarian Gods Influenced Adoption of the Trinity
Many who believe in the Trinity are surprised, perhaps shocked, to learn that the idea of divine beings existing as trinities or triads long predated Christianity. Yet, as we will see, the evidence is abundantly documented.
Marie Sinclair, Countess of Caithness, in her 1876 book Old Truths in a New Light, states: "It is generally, although erroneously, supposed that the doctrine of the Trinity is of Christian origin. Nearly every nation of antiquity possessed a similar doctrine. [The early Catholic theologian] St. Jerome testifies unequivocally, 'All the ancient nations believed in the Trinity'" (p. 382).
Notice how the following quotes document belief in a divine trinity in many regions and religions of the ancient world.
Sumeria
"The universe was divided into three regions each of which became the domain of a god. Anu's share was the sky. The earth was given to Enlil. Ea became the ruler of the waters. Together they constituted the triad of the Great Gods" (The Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 1994, pp. 54-55)
Babylonia
"The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god—as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
India
"The Puranas, one of the Hindoo Bibles of more than 3,000 years ago, contain the following passage: 'O ye three Lords! know that I recognize only one God. Inform me, therefore, which of you is the true divinity, that I may address to him alone my adorations.' The three gods, Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva [or Shiva], becoming manifest to him, replied, 'Learn, O devotee, that there is no real distinction between us. What to you appears such is only the semblance. The single being appears under three forms by the acts of creation, preservation, and destruction, but he is one.'
"Hence the triangle was adopted by all the ancient nations as a symbol of the Deity . . . Three was considered among all the pagan nations as the chief of the mystical numbers, because, as Aristotle remarks, it contains within itself a beginning, a middle, and an end. Hence we find it designating some of the attributes of almost all the pagan gods" (Sinclair, pp. 382-383).
Greece
"In the Fourth Century B.C. Aristotle wrote: 'All things are three, and thrice is all: and let us use this number in the worship of the gods; for, as the Pythagoreans say, everything and all things are bounded by threes, for the end, the middle and the beginning have this number in everything, and these compose the number of the Trinity'" (Arthur Weigall, Paganism in Our Christianity, 1928, pp. 197-198).
Egypt
"The Hymn to Amun decreed that 'No god came into being before him (Amun)' and that 'All gods are three: Amun, Re and Ptah, and there is no second to them. Hidden is his name as Amon, he is Re in face, and his body is Ptah.' . . . This is a statement of trinity, the three chief gods of Egypt subsumed into one of them, Amon. Clearly, the concept of organic unity within plurality got an extraordinary boost with this formulation. Theologically, in a crude form it came strikingly close to the later Christian form of plural Trinitarian monotheism" (Simson Najovits, Egypt, Trunk of the Tree, Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 83-84).
Other areas
Many other areas had their own divine trinities. In Greece they were Zeus, Poseidon and Adonis. The Phoenicians worshipped Ulomus, Ulosuros and Eliun. Rome worshipped Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto. In Germanic nations they were called Wodan, Thor and Fricco. Regarding the Celts, one source states, "The ancient heathen deities of the pagan Irish[,] Criosan, Biosena, and Seeva, or Sheeva, are doubtless the Creeshna [Krishna], Veeshnu [Vishnu], [or the all-inclusive] Brahma, and Seeva [Shiva], of the Hindoos" (Thomas Maurice, The History of Hindostan, Vol. 2, 1798, p. 171).
"The origin of the conception is entirely pagan"
Egyptologist Arthur Weigall, while himself a Trinitarian, summed up the influence of ancient beliefs on the adoption of the Trinity doctrine by the Catholic Church in the following excerpt from his previously cited book:
"It must not be forgotten that Jesus Christ never mentioned such a phenomenon [the Trinity], and nowhere in the New Testament does the word 'Trinity' appear. The idea was only adopted by the Church three hundred years after the death of our Lord; and the origin of the conception is entirely pagan . . .
"The ancient Egyptians, whose influence on early religious thought was profound, usually arranged their gods or goddesses in trinities: there was the trinity of Osiris, Isis, and Horus, the trinity of Amen, Mut, and Khonsu, the trinity of Khnum, Satis, and Anukis, and so forth . . .
"The early Christians, however, did not at first think of applying the idea to their own faith. They paid their devotions to God the Father and to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and they recognized the mysterious and undefined existence of the Holy Spirit; but there was no thought of these three being an actual Trinity, co-equal and united in One . . .
"The application of this old pagan conception of a Trinity to Christian theology was made possible by the recognition of the Holy Spirit as the required third 'Person,' co-equal with the other 'Persons' . . .
"The idea of the Spirit being co-equal with God was not generally recognised until the second half of the Fourth Century A.D. . . . In the year 381 the Council of Constantinople added to the earlier Nicene Creed a description of the Holy Spirit as 'the Lord, and giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and Son together is worshipped and glorified.' . . .
"Thus, the Athanasian creed, which is a later composition but reflects the general conceptions of Athanasius [the 4th-century Trinitarian whose view eventually became official doctrine] and his school, formulated the conception of a co-equal Trinity wherein the Holy Spirit was the third 'Person'; and so it was made a dogma of the faith, and belief in the Three in One and One in Three became a paramount doctrine of Christianity, though not without terrible riots and bloodshed . . .
"Today a Christian thinker . . . has no wish to be precise about it, more especially since the definition is obviously pagan in origin and was not adopted by the Church until nearly three hundred years after Christ" (pp. 197-203).
James Bonwick summarized the story well on page 396 of his 1878 work Egyptian Belief and Modern Thought: "It is an undoubted fact that more or less all over the world the deities are in triads. This rule applies to eastern and western hemispheres, to north and south.
"Further, it is observed that, in some mystical way, the triad of three persons is one. The first is as the second or third, the second as first or third, the third as first or second; in fact, they are each other, one and the same individual being. The definition of Athanasius, who lived in Egypt, applies to the trinities of all heathen religions."
- Thread starter
- #425
Somebody says:
I do not think a God could want or have unfulfilled wants or needs. God is, after all, omni everything.
As a servant of God, what wants or needs do you think God has that you can fill?
Are you ignoring the scriptures that have Jesus saying that he came to serve and not be served?
Are you for or against Jesus?
I do not think a God could want or have unfulfilled wants or needs. God is, after all, omni everything.
As a servant of God, what wants or needs do you think God has that you can fill?
Are you ignoring the scriptures that have Jesus saying that he came to serve and not be served?
Are you for or against Jesus?
- Thread starter
- #426
My answer:
- Strange question!
- A Christian is supposed to be a follower of Christ!
- The Bible tells us about the strong relationships between Yah.weh and his faithful servants!
- The Bible shows how it is important for Yah.weh!
- It is everywhere in the Bible!
- Abraham is called Yah.weh's friend!
- Yah.weh tells the devil about Job that there is no one like him on earth!
- Samuel was jealous for Yah.weh!
- Daniel is called a precious man!
- And I could go on!
- On the contrary, Israel and Judah opposed Yah.weh continuously!
- they acted worse than any other nation!
- He could have destroyed them many times!
- And he gave them the opportunity to come back to him again and again!
- Only because he made a promise to Abraham and because Abraham was his friend!
- Strange question!
- A Christian is supposed to be a follower of Christ!
- The Bible tells us about the strong relationships between Yah.weh and his faithful servants!
- The Bible shows how it is important for Yah.weh!
- It is everywhere in the Bible!
- Abraham is called Yah.weh's friend!
- Yah.weh tells the devil about Job that there is no one like him on earth!
- Samuel was jealous for Yah.weh!
- Daniel is called a precious man!
- And I could go on!
- On the contrary, Israel and Judah opposed Yah.weh continuously!
- they acted worse than any other nation!
- He could have destroyed them many times!
- And he gave them the opportunity to come back to him again and again!
- Only because he made a promise to Abraham and because Abraham was his friend!
- Thread starter
- #429
Somebody says:
His Rabbinic teachings?
On Jesus dying for Christians, from a moral perspective.
It takes quite an imagination and ego to think a god would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
To abdicate your personal responsibility for your actions or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Christians also have to ignore what Jesus, as a Jewish Rabbi, would have taught his people.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Psa 49;7 None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
There is no way that Christians parents would teach their children to use a scapegoat.
Good morals and Jesus speak against the messianic concept and bids us pick up our crosses and follow him.
His Rabbinic teachings?
On Jesus dying for Christians, from a moral perspective.
It takes quite an imagination and ego to think a god would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
To abdicate your personal responsibility for your actions or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Christians also have to ignore what Jesus, as a Jewish Rabbi, would have taught his people.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Psa 49;7 None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
There is no way that Christians parents would teach their children to use a scapegoat.
Good morals and Jesus speak against the messianic concept and bids us pick up our crosses and follow him.
- Thread starter
- #430
My answer:
- What do you mean when you say after condemning us unjustly?
- A perfect life for a perfect life: just a balance!
- Divine balance!
- Everyone is responsible for his actions and will be responsible when the Big One comes!
- Can you give examples of what Christians have to ignore about Jesus' teaching!
- If parents make good or bad decisions, their children can suffer the consequences!
- If you take the example of Israel, they took advantage of the promise Yah.weh made to Abraham!
- But they kept opposing Yah.weh!
- And they acted worse and worse!
- What do you mean when you say after condemning us unjustly?
- A perfect life for a perfect life: just a balance!
- Divine balance!
- Everyone is responsible for his actions and will be responsible when the Big One comes!
- Can you give examples of what Christians have to ignore about Jesus' teaching!
- If parents make good or bad decisions, their children can suffer the consequences!
- If you take the example of Israel, they took advantage of the promise Yah.weh made to Abraham!
- But they kept opposing Yah.weh!
- And they acted worse and worse!
- Thread starter
- #431
What can a finite being like you or I do that could possibly gain us eternal hell?
He is a genocidal and immoral prick who kills when he could just as easily cure.
Would you follow Yahweh anywhere?
- There is no eternal hell!
He is a genocidal and immoral prick who kills when he could just as easily cure.
- There is so much to learn and to work for him forever!
- Unbelievable!
Would you follow Yahweh anywhere?
- Definitely!
- Man away from Yah.weh “is a genocidal and immoral prick who kills when he could just as easily cure”!
- And if Yah.weh doesn’t cleanse the human society, man would destroy himself and everything on earth!
- When you take away man, nature can purify itself!
- Thread starter
- #432
10) The siblings of Jesus
Matthew 10:2
- His brother Andrew (autou adelphos Andreas)
- James (son) of Zebedee (Iakobos ho Zebedaiou)
- And his brother John (kai autou adelphos Ioannes)
Matthew 10:3
James (son) of Alphaeus (Iakobos ho Halphaiou)
Matthew 10:20
- The Spirit of your Father (to Pneuma tou hymon Patros)
Matthew 10:21
- Brother (adelphos) will betray brother (adelphon) to death
- And a father (pater) (his) child (teknon)
- Children (tekna) will rise against (their) parent (goneis)
Matthew 10:23
- The Son of man (ho Huios tou anthropou)
Matthew 10:29
- Of your Father (hymon Patros)
Matthew 10:32
- My Father (mou Patros)
Matthew 10:33
- My Father (mou Patros)
Matthew 10:35
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
Matthew 10:37
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 9 :
- We have the following words :
- his brother (and name)
- name of son and definite article and name of father
- Your Father
- Brother and brother
- Father and child
- Children and parent
- The Son of man
- Your father
- My Father
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
Matthew 10:2
- His brother Andrew (autou adelphos Andreas)
- James (son) of Zebedee (Iakobos ho Zebedaiou)
- And his brother John (kai autou adelphos Ioannes)
Matthew 10:3
James (son) of Alphaeus (Iakobos ho Halphaiou)
Matthew 10:20
- The Spirit of your Father (to Pneuma tou hymon Patros)
Matthew 10:21
- Brother (adelphos) will betray brother (adelphon) to death
- And a father (pater) (his) child (teknon)
- Children (tekna) will rise against (their) parent (goneis)
Matthew 10:23
- The Son of man (ho Huios tou anthropou)
Matthew 10:29
- Of your Father (hymon Patros)
Matthew 10:32
- My Father (mou Patros)
Matthew 10:33
- My Father (mou Patros)
Matthew 10:35
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
Matthew 10:37
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 9 :
- We have the following words :
- his brother (and name)
- name of son and definite article and name of father
- Your Father
- Brother and brother
- Father and child
- Children and parent
- The Son of man
- Your father
- My Father
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
- Thread starter
- #433
36) Cold or Hot Anger?
- In Deuteronomy Chapter 1, Moses tells the Israelites that they refused to get into the promised land!
- As a consequence, they would die in the desert!
- Because of them, Yah.weh was angry at Moses and he couldn’t get into the promised land either!
- Then they decided to get into the promised land against Yah.weh’s will!
- And they lost against the Amorites!
- What an obstinate people!
- So is mankind!
- They never understand!
- Because they don’t want to understand!
- And the doors will be closed as it was when Noah and his family entered into the ark!
- Being obstinate leads nowhere!
- Being humble is the only way to open the doors!
- Thread starter
- #434
37) Cold or Hot Anger?
- In Deuteronomy Chapter 3, Moses asks Yah.weh to let him get into the promised land!
- But he and Aaron didn’t give the glory to Yah.weh when the Israelites could get water!
- But Yah.weh would not listen to Moses!
- He was still furious with him because of the Israelites!
- But he listened to Moses each time Moses prevented him from destroying Israel!
- What belongs to Yah.weh belongs to Yah.weh!
- There is no possible discussion!
- Whoever doesn’t understand that will face death!
- When the Big One occurs, everybody will understand that but it will be too late!
- It is not possible to play with Yah.weh!
- When time comes, it is necessary to pay!
- Thread starter
- #435
11) The siblings of Jesus
Matthew 11 :16
- Children (paidiois)
Matthew 11:25
- Father (Pater)
Matthew 11:26
- Father (Pater)
Matthew 11:27
- By my Father (hypo mou Patros)
- The Son (ton Huion)
- The Father (ho Pater)
- The Father (ton Patera)
- The Son (ho Huios)
- The Son (ho Huios)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 11:
- We have the following words :
- Children (paidiois)
- Father (Pater)
- By my Father (hypo mou Patros)
- The Son (ton Huion)
- The Father (ho Pater)
- The Father (ton Patera)
- The Son (ho Huios)
Matthew 11 :16
- Children (paidiois)
Matthew 11:25
- Father (Pater)
Matthew 11:26
- Father (Pater)
Matthew 11:27
- By my Father (hypo mou Patros)
- The Son (ton Huion)
- The Father (ho Pater)
- The Father (ton Patera)
- The Son (ho Huios)
- The Son (ho Huios)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 11:
- We have the following words :
- Children (paidiois)
- Father (Pater)
- By my Father (hypo mou Patros)
- The Son (ton Huion)
- The Father (ho Pater)
- The Father (ton Patera)
- The Son (ho Huios)
- Thread starter
- #436
38) Cold or Hot Anger?
- In Deuteronomy Chapter 9, we are told that Israel has no righteousness!
- Israel is an obstinate people!
- They provoked Yah.weh in the wilderness!
- They rebelled against Yah.weh!
- In Horeb, Yah.weh wanted to annihilate Israel!
- They made a golden calf!
- At Tabʹe·rah, At Masʹsah, and at Kibʹroth-hat·taʹa·vah, they provoked Yah.weh!
- Is that clear enough?
- It should be!
- Thread starter
- #437
12) The siblings of Jesus
Matthew 12 :23
- The Son of david (ho huios Dauid)
Matthew 12:40
- The Son of Man (ho Huios anthropou)
Matthew 12:46
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
Matthew 12:47
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
Matthew 12:48
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
Matthew 12:49
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
Matthew 12:50
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 12:
- We have the following words :
- The Son of david (ho huios Dauid)
- The Son of Man (ho Huios anthropou)
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
________________________________________________________________________________
Jacob (Iakob) the father (egennesen) of Judah (Ioudan) and (kai) his (autou) brothers (adelphous)
- Matthew 1:11
- And Josiah the father of Jeconiah and (kai) his (autou) brothers (adelphous)
- The Child (paidion) with His (autou) mother (metros) Mary (marias)
- The Child (paidion) and His (autou) mother (metera) (5 times)
- Two brothers, Simon called Peter and his brother Andrew (dyo adelphous Simona legomenon Petron kai autou adelphon Andrean)
- Two other brothers, James (son) of Zebedee and his brother John (dyo allous adelphous Iakobon ton Zebedaiou kai autou adelphon Ioannen)
- (Peter’s) mother-in-law (autou pentheran)
- Brother and brother
- Father and child
- Children and parent
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
________________________________________________________________________________
- HERE WE GET THE ANSWER !
-HERE WE SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANCIENT HEBREW AND ANCIENT GREEK !
- BIBLICAL HEBREW IS LIMITED !
- IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WITH GREEK !
WITH GREEK WE GET PRECISION !
- THE EXPRESSION USED BY MATTHEW ARE QUITE CLEAR !
- AND IT IS THE SAME ALL THE TIME !
- AND MATTHEW IS PRECISE !
- NO CONFUSION IS POSSIBLE !
- JESUS HAD SIBLINGS WITH CERTAINTY !
- AND JESUS’ CONCLUSION IS THE BEST MY BROTHER AND SISTER AND MOTHER !
Matthew 12 :23
- The Son of david (ho huios Dauid)
Matthew 12:40
- The Son of Man (ho Huios anthropou)
Matthew 12:46
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
Matthew 12:47
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
Matthew 12:48
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
Matthew 12:49
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
Matthew 12:50
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 12:
- We have the following words :
- The Son of david (ho huios Dauid)
- The Son of Man (ho Huios anthropou)
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
________________________________________________________________________________
Jacob (Iakob) the father (egennesen) of Judah (Ioudan) and (kai) his (autou) brothers (adelphous)
- Matthew 1:11
- And Josiah the father of Jeconiah and (kai) his (autou) brothers (adelphous)
- The Child (paidion) with His (autou) mother (metros) Mary (marias)
- The Child (paidion) and His (autou) mother (metera) (5 times)
- Two brothers, Simon called Peter and his brother Andrew (dyo adelphous Simona legomenon Petron kai autou adelphon Andrean)
- Two other brothers, James (son) of Zebedee and his brother John (dyo allous adelphous Iakobon ton Zebedaiou kai autou adelphon Ioannen)
- (Peter’s) mother-in-law (autou pentheran)
- Brother and brother
- Father and child
- Children and parent
- A man against his (autou) father (patros)
- A daughter (thygatera) against her (autes) mother (metros)
- A daughter-in-law (nymphen) against her(autes) mother-in-law (pentheras)
- Father (patera) or mother (metera)
- son (huion) or daughter (thygatera)
- His mother and brothers (autou meter kai adelphoi)
- Your mother and brothers (sou meter kai adelphoi)
- My mother, and … My brothers (mou meter kai … mou adelphoi)
- (Pointing to His disciples, He said, « Here are) My mother and My brothers (mou meter kai mou adelphoi)
- (For whoever does the will of) My Father (mou Patros) (in heaven is) My brother and sister and mother » (mou adephos kai adelphe kai meter)
________________________________________________________________________________
- HERE WE GET THE ANSWER !
-HERE WE SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANCIENT HEBREW AND ANCIENT GREEK !
- BIBLICAL HEBREW IS LIMITED !
- IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WITH GREEK !
WITH GREEK WE GET PRECISION !
- THE EXPRESSION USED BY MATTHEW ARE QUITE CLEAR !
- AND IT IS THE SAME ALL THE TIME !
- AND MATTHEW IS PRECISE !
- NO CONFUSION IS POSSIBLE !
- JESUS HAD SIBLINGS WITH CERTAINTY !
- AND JESUS’ CONCLUSION IS THE BEST MY BROTHER AND SISTER AND MOTHER !
- Thread starter
- #438
39) Cold or Hot Anger?
- In Deuteronomy 25, Yah.weh remembers israel that Amalek attacked them when they came back from Egypt!
- Thus he opposed Yah.weh!
- So when Yah.weh gets them rest from all their enemies, they must do everything so the name of Amalek will disappear!
- Thread starter
- #439
13) The siblings of Jesus
Matthew 13 :55
- The carpenter’s son (ho tektonos huios)
- His mother’s name Mary (autou meter legetai Mariam)
- His brothers (adelphoi) James (Iakobos), Joseph (Ioseph), Simon (Simon), and (kai) Judas (Ioudas) ?
Matthew 1 »:56
- All his sisters (pasai autou adelphai)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 13:
- We have the following words :
- The carpenter’s son (ho tektonos huios)
- His mother’s name Mary (autou meter legetai Mariam)
- His brothers (adelphoi) James (Iakobos), Joseph (Ioseph), Simon (Simon), and (kai) Judas (Ioudas) ?
- All his sisters (pasai autou adelphai)
- As usual we get the same precision that’s is the carpenter’s son, his mother’s name, his brothers’ names and his sisters without names !
Matthew 13 :55
- The carpenter’s son (ho tektonos huios)
- His mother’s name Mary (autou meter legetai Mariam)
- His brothers (adelphoi) James (Iakobos), Joseph (Ioseph), Simon (Simon), and (kai) Judas (Ioudas) ?
Matthew 1 »:56
- All his sisters (pasai autou adelphai)
CONCLUSION OF MATTHEW CHAPTER 13:
- We have the following words :
- The carpenter’s son (ho tektonos huios)
- His mother’s name Mary (autou meter legetai Mariam)
- His brothers (adelphoi) James (Iakobos), Joseph (Ioseph), Simon (Simon), and (kai) Judas (Ioudas) ?
- All his sisters (pasai autou adelphai)
- As usual we get the same precision that’s is the carpenter’s son, his mother’s name, his brothers’ names and his sisters without names !
- Thread starter
- #440
40) Cold or Hot Anger?
- In Deuteronomy 31, Yah.weh tells Moses that he is going to die!
- And he says that as soon as Moses is dead, Israel will begin to commit spiritual prostitution with the foreign gods that are in Canaan!
- They will forsake him and break his covenant!
- Then each time Yah.weh will become angry and strike them with calamities and distresses!
- And Yah.weh tells Moses to write down a song about rebellious Israel and it will serve as a witness to them!
- Then Moses tells the song to Israel!