Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I don't know... That's not the way it's depicted on Discovery or anywhere else for that matter.
And those advocating the idea really need to choose a better word other than "Exploded".
Anyway it still leaves me wondering...
If all the matter in the universe was condensed to a relatively tiny volume wouldn't the gravity be so intense that it couldn't expand?
With the Big-Bang theory something has to overcome the super intense gravity and result not in microwave, radio wave, gamma rays, X-rays or other oscillating energy
but rather mass... hydrogen, iron, carbon... the elements. And it cannot "evaporate" else it too loses mass as the black hole. I know of no star born of radio emissions, gamma rays etc. but real matter, the elements.
The Barbarian said:Does anyone know the cause for the decay of a polonium atom at a specific moment in time?
If so, I'd like to know what it is. All the evidence indicates it's a totally random process.
The KalÄÂm cosmological argument is so common sensical that I'd bet on us just not yet discoverying the "the cause for the decay of a polonium atom at a specific moment in time"* rather than it being uncaused.
* I know nothing about the decay of polonium atoms.
The KalÄÂm cosmological argument is so common sensical that I'd bet on us just not yet discoverying the "the cause for the decay of a polonium atom at a specific moment in time"* rather than it being uncaused.
* I know nothing about the decay of polonium atoms.
The Barbarian said:...So far...
The Barbarian said:With the Big-Bang theory something has to overcome the super intense gravity and result not in microwave, radio wave, gamma rays, X-rays or other oscillating energy
but rather mass... hydrogen, iron, carbon... the elements. And it cannot "evaporate" else it too loses mass as the black hole. I know of no star born of radio emissions, gamma rays etc. but real matter, the elements.
For one thing, at the kinds of pressures and temperatures you'd see in the Big Bang, there would be no matter, no subatomic particles. So gravity wouldn't even exist until the four forces decoupled quite a bit later.
If this makes no sense to you, you've got some reading to do. Hawking has a new book; "A Briefer History of Time"; he's really worked to make it understandable. Worth your time, I think.
Any idea how the universe got to such a state?
The Barbarian said:So far, we haven't found orange leprechauns hiding in your garage, either. That's not evidence that they might be there.
The Barbarian said:Any idea how the universe got to such a state?
Someone said "let there be light."
minnesota said:J. Richard Gott, an astrophysicist at Princeton University, believes the universe 'created' itself.
Crying Rock said:minnesota said:J. Richard Gott, an astrophysicist at Princeton University, believes the universe 'created' itself.
Lets hear what he has to say.
Crying Rock said:minnesota said:J. Richard Gott, an astrophysicist at Princeton University, believes the universe 'created' itself.
Lets hear what he has to say.
minnesota said:Google Books allows you to preview his book Time Travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time.