Whats the problem with sacriices taking place in the 1000 years?

[Jake]

Not going back to the law,i dont know why you dont understand that, the sacrifices represented Christ, not the laws, no man was redeemed from the laws, ever.
Abraham didnt look to the laws, he looked to God and beleived in the promises he literally would not recieve in his lifetime, yet he believed knowing God they would be recieved.
Just as Daniel spoke of the promise before it was even recieved, knowing God, he said in the Holy Ghost before the promise "The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I put your enemies under Your feet"

He didnt look to the laws, he followed them looking to Christ, that he would recieve even in death the promise, as all the righeous do.
The law always pointed to Christ and never redeemed anything, they were followed by holy men because holy men followed God. As i have said multiple times God was never pleased in animal blood, nor was He ever pleased in animal blood given as per commanded when it was done in emptyness, He was always pleased in the inward being performed outwardly in His command, which in the O.T was the law. He gave the law. He is the law.

The way they are carried out is different! There are some people who insist on following the old law, not that it even matters who or what it points to, now we are in the new law - there is a difference, regarldess that they both point to Christ.
The difference being the requirements of those laws.

 

[warfrog]

The way they are carried out is different! There are some people who insist on following the old law, not that it even matters who or what it points to, now we are in the new law - there is a difference, regarldess that they both point to Christ.
The difference being the requirements of those laws.

They wouldnt be the law.
They would point to the represtation they always did, Christ.
In the thouand years they represent an act of celebration of what they always represnted, not the law, Christ.

 

[Sinthesis]

And grain sacrifices are...?

 

[warfrog]

And grain sacrifices are...?

What are they?
Whats the meaning of grain sacrifices Sinthesis? Did the burning grain ext make anything better?

 

[Elijah674]

The D-E-A-D do not offer sacrifices! And what purpose has a chained satan doing so??

 

[reba]

He is the bread of life
He is the manna

 

[warfrog]

The D-E-A-D do not offer sacrifices! And what purpose has a chained satan doing so??

Scripture where it says the dead would be offering sacrifices?





So why would you assume such?

 

[warfrog]

He is the bread of life
He is the manna

Glory to the Lord!

 

[Elijah674]

Scripture where it says the dead would be offering sacrifices?

So why would you assume such?

It just seems that the RE: penman below is suggesting that there is no problem during the 1000 years with someone offering sacrifices? (if that was you or not? I was just responding to that question!)

And if you need proof of the wicked being all dead & the saved in heaven during this specified time period, let me know, the Bible is very clear on this.

Re: Whats the problem with sacriices taking place in the 1000 years?

 

[Elijah674]

Christ comes! The Saved DEAD ones are raised & we that are still alive will ALL be changed in a twinkling of an eye into bodily perfection as well as spiritual. We GO TO HEAVEN WITH CHRIST. Leaving [ALL WICKED STILL DEAD].

For 1000 years we will all take part in the JUDGEMENT of the EXECUTIONAL STAGE of these ones. (millions over the years + angels) And the shortest verse in the Bible is 'Jesus Wept'! And before Rev. 21 finds New Jerusalem with [ALL TEARS WIPED AWAY], we find that we will ALL TAKE PART IN THIS ACCURATE INTRICATE JUDICIAL JUDGMENT! 1 Cor. 6:1-3.

And of course, God even has this all totally documented in the Record Books with every detail why these ones did not choose life eternal. (we might even find some there in these books who are not, because of our 'tame' profession of Love?) Eccl. 12:13-14 + Rev. 20:12 finds that this is the ONLY WAY the lost dead will be standing in heaven.. BY RECORD BOOKS.

 

[Jake]

They wouldnt be the law.
They would point to the represtation they always did, Christ.

Yes! Christ said, tear down this temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days, WE are the representative of Christ now, the temples, His Body, united in Christ! It'll be an awesome celebration with the temple of His body celebrating!!

 

[warfrog]

Yes! Christ said, tear down this temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days, WE are the representative of Christ now, the temples, His Body, united in Christ! It'll be an awesome celebration with the temple of His body celebrating!!

I dont disagree with what you just said at all, i agree completely, i do not understand how that affects if a sacrifice does or doesnt occur during the 1000 years.

 

[warfrog]

It just seems that the RE: penman below is suggesting that there is no problem during the 1000 years with someone offering sacrifices? (if that was you or not? I was just responding to that question!)

And if you need proof of the wicked being all dead & the saved in heaven during this specified time period, let me know, the Bible is very clear on this.

Re: Whats the problem with sacriices taking place in the 1000 years?

You didnt answer the question offered, where is the scripture saying the dead would be offering sacrifices during the 1000 years?

You said the dead dont offer sacrifices, so if thier are no scriptures saying the dead offer sacrifices during the 1000 years why would you assume anyone said the dead offer sacrifices during the thousand years?

You can display your proof as you said, but while doing so please keep Rev 20:7-10 in thought.

 

[Jake]

I dont disagree with what you just said at all, i agree completely, i do not understand how that affects if a sacrifice does or doesnt occur during the 1000 years.

My point is, as believers, we are supposed to be representing Christ, the sacrifice is us dying to ourselves and manifesting Christ, we point to Christ.

There is no need, zero, nill reason why there will be animal sacrifices in the future, for any reason, even for a celebration. It is no longer those kinds of sacrifices, we are the sacrifice, we are to be an acceptable sacrifice to the Father.

 

[warfrog]

My point is, as believers, we are supposed to be representing Christ, the sacrifice is us dying to ourselves and manifesting Christ, we point to Christ.

There is no need, zero, nill reason why there will be animal sacrifices in the future, for any reason, even for a celebration. It is no longer those kinds of sacrifices, we are the sacrifice, we are to be an acceptable sacrifice to the Father.

Yes and i dont dissagree with that at all, it still doesnt have any merit towards what i have been talking aout regarding the thousand years.
That doesnt say aything about if they could or couldnt occur as been talked about.
O.T sacrfice was acceptable only for those who were true to God and looked to Christ through those sacrifices knowing they would recieve what wasnt to come during thier lietimes. The sacrifices themselves God never was pleased as i pointed out in scripture, it ws the hearts of the men, thier faith in God to beleive and follow Him.
That doesnt mean anything in regards to the 1000 years doing so in celebration to what occured at the cross.

 

[Elijah674]

Yes and i dont dissagree with that at all, it still doesnt have any merit towards what i have been talking aout regarding the thousand years.
That doesnt say aything about if they could or couldnt occur as been talked about.
O.T sacrfice was acceptable only for those who were true to God and looked to Christ through those sacrifices knowing they would recieve what wasnt to come during thier lietimes. The sacrifices themselves God never was pleased as i pointed out in scripture, it ws the hearts of the men, thier faith in God to beleive and follow Him.
That doesnt mean anything in regards to the 1000 years doing so in celebration to what occured at the cross.

Your post is just not very clear for me to understand what you are saying! (No offence, I hear that all the time!;))

So where are the DEAD at during the 1000 years, and where are the Saved at at that time period? And do you not think that the 1000 years are finding this time period with a DESOLATE earth, with only satan here at this period of time?

Jer. 4:22-27 is BELIEVED by me as this 1000 year time/period with NO Man (living) & with NO heaven ibid. 12, & this time starts at the Second Coming of Christ ibid. 26! And the WHOLE LAND SHALL BE DESOLATE ibid. 27.

And the next verse finds that the only one of mankind that could be living.. ARE IN HEAVEN from the First Resurection when Christ returnes! 1 Thess. 4:15-17.

 

[Jake]

Yes and i dont dissagree with that at all, it still doesnt have any merit towards what i have been talking aout regarding the thousand years.
That doesnt say aything about if they could or couldnt occur as been talked about.
O.T sacrfice was acceptable only for those who were true to God and looked to Christ through those sacrifices knowing they would recieve what wasnt to come during thier lietimes. The sacrifices themselves God never was pleased as i pointed out in scripture, it ws the hearts of the men, thier faith in God to beleive and follow Him.
That doesnt mean anything in regards to the 1000 years doing so in celebration to what occured at the cross.

We're running around in circles and it won't resolve this warfrog. Plain and simple, there is another way to do things now, even in celebrations, we are not Jewish, we are the Church.

 

[warfrog]

We're running around in circles and it won't resolve this warfrog. Plain and simple, there is another way to do things now, even in celebrations, we are not Jewish, we are the Church.

You are Jewish, you are Isreal, just as His from the O.T times are, Abraham is my brother through Christ, i am grafted in.

You cant get past that they never represented anything other than Christ to Father, He never saw the blood of an animal or smelt the distinct flavor of grains burning, He saw His only begotten Son whom He sent into the world that whoever beleived in Him would have everlasting life, so did His holy men of the O.T and the law.
You see the law in those sacrifices, I see Christ, during the mellinium it would be no different, except we will have been resurrected and changed, risen as Christ rose an be with us not only in who we are inwardly through the Holy Spirit, but standing there with us while we are a new man in which the former things have passed away in us.
The kingdom of God wil be at the doors.

Your right though, we are going in circles, it was a pleasure having this discussion with you, thank you.

 

[Jake]

You are Jewish, you are Isreal, just as His from the O.T times are, Abraham is my brother through Christ, i am grafted in.

You cant get past that they never represented anything other than Christ to Father, He never saw the blood of an animal or smelt the distinct flavor of grains burning, He saw His only begotten Son whom He sent into the world that whoever beleived in Him would have everlasting life, so did His holy men of the O.T and the law.
You see the law, I see Christ, during the mellinium it would be no different, except we will have been resurrected and changed, risen as Christ rose an be with us not only in who we are inwardly through the Holy Spirit, but standing there with us.
The kingdom of God wil be at the doors.

Your right though, we are going in circles, it was a pleasure having this discussion with you, thank you.

We are Israel, yes, it is the Church!
It was good discussing with you as well.
peace.

 

[warfrog]

We are Israel, yes, it is the Church!
It was good discussing with you as well.
peace.

Glory to the Lord God Almighty!

I edited my post with i think 5 or so words, when i read it back i viewed that it may seem as though i was targeting you, so i added what i really mean beside "You see the law" and at the end of "standing there with us"

Hope that makes it clearly what i meant by my words.