Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
again, so messianic jews aren't saved? my last name is askenazic. and I don't even got to a temple. I merely stated my surname and where it came from and that im saved. you would argue that with paul whom listed his tribe and lineage. paul the man of the tribe of Benjamin. a Pharisee and rabbi. schooled far more then I was or ever would be in jewry.
I know what I know based on what I have read , the age of accountablilty isn't set. does a one year old speak? able to understand the bible? NO. he cant. but I know of a man(my pastor) who got saved a three.i haven't even added in my sister whom isn't able to understand this sentence. she cant read. she cant speak, nor write.she has an iq of 24. born that way.is she damned to hell?
Why would a man think we do?
If it wasn't for a woman Yeshua would not have entered the world. ... ...
LEWIS W,b
that is rare, yes they are intelligent and have a soul but again if I ask my grandchild one day onefootnote (don't remember sources): 3 newborn babies were known to speak their first day, the day of their physical living birth.
might be fun to look into, prayerful and just lighthearted, maybe learn something along the way... ... ?
we both know they have to be told about sin first and then understand it then decide.tell me what or whom god is and sin
there was only one woman in the world at that time, maybe Adam had already incurred Eve's wrath and was afraid to say no to her.history didn't work this way. what if adam said no, and didn't eat the fruit?
how, we don't know where he was at and how long it was before she presented the fruit to adam?there was only one woman in the world at that time, maybe Adam had already incurred Eve's wrath and was afraid to say no to her.
just sayin maybe.
And yet per that observation, that God said the sins of the father won't be passed unto their sons and each is responsible for their own sins, that sin is a factor at all in our reality is due to the sins of the father, Adam, being passed unto the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve.
Even after the deluge when 9 in one family propagated the sinner human race again.
there was only one woman in the world at that time, maybe Adam had already incurred Eve's wrath and was afraid to say no to her.
just sayin maybe.
the Scripture says : (albeit in english, which is sometimes or often a poor translation)how, we don't know where he was at and how long it was before she presented the fruit to adam?
she had to convince him to do that. was he near when satan tempted her?the Scripture says : (albeit in english, which is sometimes or often a poor translation)
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
he isn't the one mentioned as being deceived. eve is. he choose to sin and wasn't deceived in the process. its said that by paul. paul said that eve was deceived, not adam . the often used verses for why woman can preach is where that is saidwhere does it say she had to convince him ? elsewhere i think it is written that he simply ate it when she gave it to him. again, it's in english, so it may actually have different than this meaning and different implications in the original text.
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression
trueThat's funny! I highly doubt it though. Fear of women is a learned state of being, lol, and this was a pre-ERA world at the time.
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.the Scripture says : (albeit in english, which is sometimes or often a poor translation)
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
It seems if she ate then had to go find Adam to give it to him she would have known she was naked before him
v7 implies they realized it at same time, so maybe they ate at same time.