• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

[_ Old Earth _] Why Evolution Cannot Be A Religion

minnesota said:
I don't understand how it does either. Who was the one making such a point?
you brought up social darwinism... and i am asking why you brought it up?
 
Evointrinsic said:
you brought up social darwinism... and i am asking why you brought it up?
It was only intended as an example. That is, my argument is that people can develop myths around evolution and the theory of evolution. Social Darwinism is one example of how that could be done.
 
minnesota said:
Evointrinsic said:
The source of social Darwinism was not Darwin but Herbert Spencer and the tradition of Protestant nonconformism going back to Hobbes via Malthus. Spencer's ideas of evolution were Lamarckian. The only real connection between Darwinism and social Darwinism is the name. Evolutionary theory shows us that the long-term survival of a species is strongly linked with its genetic variability. All Social Darwinist programs advocate minimizing genetic variability, thus reducing chances of long-term survival in the event of environmental change. An understanding of evolution should then rebuke any attempt at social Darwinism if the long-term survival of humanity is treated as a goal. Eugenics and social Darwinian accounts are more often tied to the rise of the science of genetics than to evolutionary theory.
Geez. Now, I understand why you're misreading my posts now about social Darwinism. You're not thinking for yourself. Plagiarism is unethical. This marks the second time you have been nailed for it.

Indeed, you should cite your sources, and not give the impression that what you've wrote are your own thoughts:

http://books.google.com/books?id=Ul17Oc ... t&resnum=5


Evolution merely describes part of nature. The fact that that part of nature is important to many people does not make evolution a religion. Consider some attributes of religion and how evolution compares:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA610.html

There's nothing wrong with incorporating other's work in an argument, but the work should be cited. No huge sin, just a learning experience.
 
Back
Top