Why is FLAT EARTH such a threat?

[Barbarian]

Have the courage, and humility, to watch the video. If you watch the entire video with sincerity and come away still believing in round earth, then you have acute cognitive dissonance and are unreachable, or simply do not have the capacity to think for yourself.

Too many problems. Why can you launch a bigger payload into space when you launch it eastward and even more if you launch it closer to the equator?

Why does the Coriolis effect work one way in the Northern Hemisphere and the other way in the Southern hemisphere? Why is there a Coriiolis effect? Why does a Foucault pendulum work?

No, there's just too much of that. Our honest Flat-Earther just ran head-on into another of those things, and being honest, admits that he can't explain it.

 

[Milk-Drops]

Let's speak in layman's terms please so that everyone can clearly understand your claims, and so that you can't pretend to be more intelligent than you are.

Explain to those reading along why, according to the scientific laws of gravity, a feather barely falls at all while a sherman tank is almost immovable.

The more mass an object has, the more the force of gravity enacts on it. A tank is mad of very dance materials so it takes a greater force to move a tank, than a feather. The Law of gravity is that the more mass an object has, the more its effected by the distortion of space.

 

[theWind]

I was just touched to see a true flat Earth believer retaining enough intellectual honesty to admit that he just found convincing evidence for a round Earth.

Bob Knodel. Knodel is a proud Flat-Earther who was so confident in the theory that he spent a whopping $20,000 on an experiment that ironically concluded that the Earth is round.
The conspiracy theorist has a YouTube channel that is dedicated to proving that the Earth is flat and the channel has developed a community.

You've been had.

Just like all round earth proponents, you survive upon mass quantities of assumption.

Have you found the courage to watch the video yet?

Exactly.

 

[theWind]

If you drop a Sherman tank and a feather in a vacuum, they will fall at the same rate.

And you've proven this with empirical experimentation?

Again, ... exactly.

All of your knowledge is assumed, and relies upon great faith in that which you've been "taught."

Science is your religion and you don't even know it.

Do you even believe in the Bible? Do you know anything about it?

 

[theWind]

Too many problems. Why can you launch a bigger payload into space when you launch it eastward and even more if you launch it closer to the equator?

Why does the Coriolis effect work one way in the Northern Hemisphere and the other way in the Southern hemisphere? Why is there a Coriiolis effect? Why does a Foucault pendulum work?

No, there's just too much of that. Our honest Flat-Earther just ran head-on into another of those things, and being honest, admits that he can't explain it.

Your Einstein made a well-known statement that is now a quote that basically states that it is the height of ignorance to dismiss a case without even considering it.

That's what you're doing in refusing to view the video.

We'll continue our exchange once you've found the courage to do so.

 

[theWind]

The more mass an object has, the more the force of gravity enacts on it.

So your claim is that gravity is a magical force that pulls more strongly on heavier/denser objects than it does on lighter/less dense objects?

When the wind blows, does it blow your car more easily than the leaves that are on or around it?

When you pull on things, do you have more power to pull them the heavier/more dense they are?

If gravity was real, it would hold the lighter objects to the ground and the heavier objects would be floating free.

That's just not the case.

Gravity is not a force and it doesn't work as Science claims it does.

The law of density is what we all experience on a daily basis and it's taught nowhere in the world. That's because a foundation of the Scientific lies is that the earth is round and there is no absolute UP and DOWN. But the earth is flat and there IS an absolute up and down. Less dense objects rise (go up) and more dense objects fall (go down).

Simple and repeatably verifiable every single time.

The Earth is flat. And all of the verifiable evidence proves it.

 

[jeremiah1five]

Say I'm just curious what all the hubbub is about.

Why is Flat Earth the absolute worst thing I could possibly ask a question about on a Christian Forum?

We can discuss satan and child rape and child trafficking and demon worship and all doctrines of all kinds from all other religions, but say a single word about Flat Earth and you are swarmed, attacked, mocked, ridiculed and your words/threads are removed, if you aren't outright banned.

Why is this concept such a threat?

Think about it. If I were to go around pushing the idea that something completely unbiblical, and totally asinine, were the truth, most wouldn't even pay any attention. A few would speak up and correct me, but most would just look upon me like we look at an ignorant child that doesn't know any better. No frills, no chaos.

Why? Why is the Flat Earth the absolute unspeakable evil on every Christian Discussion Forum, much less any social media forum?

What gives? Why is it SO threatening?

We fall off the edge.

 

[Milk-Drops]

So your claim is that gravity is a magical force that pulls more strongly on heavier/denser objects than it does on lighter/less dense objects?

No, I think you misunderstand. The force is equal to the tank and feather. Since the feather has less mass than the tank, the wind can easily move a feather. I pointed out that the law of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. Based on how much mass is in either the feather or Tank we can calculate the weights of both. Then, as Barbarian said if another force that is strong enough to move the mass of the Feather acts on it, the feather will move. Otherwise the feather will be at rest at the lowest point it can obtain.

When the wind blows, does it blow your car more easily than the leaves that are on or around it?

The leaves have less mass than a car. So light wind can easily move the leaves, while the car would require more force.

When you pull on things, do you have more power to pull them the heavier/more dense they are?

No because the amount of energy to move any object is relative to its mass. You are mixing up mass with gravity.

If gravity was real, it would hold the lighter objects to the ground and the heavier objects would be floating free.

Why would that be?

That's just not the case.

Gravity is not a force and it doesn't work as Science claims it does.

No, the Law of gravity states that matter will ne pulled towards the center of mass. On earth its 9.8 m/s^2

The law of density is what we all experience on a daily basis and it's taught nowhere in the world.

Primarily because density is an characteristic of matter. The reason you can't stick you hand through lead is because of the density of lead. You can stick your hand through water because it's less Dense than your flesh. However Density is not a force. You still need a force to act upon an object to make it move in a direction. Why do balloons float? The helium in the baloon is less dense than air, do it rises above the air, why does the balloon go up instead of to the side of air? Gravity. The air is pulled down and the less dense balloon is pushed to the top of the air. As the helium leaks out of the balloon, the more dense balloon will fall towards the center of gravity.

That's because a foundation of the Scientific lies is that the earth is round and there is no absolute UP and DOWN. But the earth is flat and there IS an absolute up and down. Less dense objects rise (go up) and more dense objects fall (go down).

Simple and repeatably verifiable every single time.

what force pulls denser objects down? (You are literally describing a renamed version of gravity).

The Earth is flat. And all of the verifiable evidence proves it.

You haven't convinced me yet.

 

[Riven]

Wait... so you don't believe in gravity either?

 

[theWind]

No, I think you misunderstand. The force is equal to the tank and feather. Since the feather has less mass than the tank, the wind can easily move a feather. I pointed out that the law of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. Based on how much mass is in either the feather or Tank we can calculate the weights of both. Then, as Barbarian said if another force that is strong enough to move the mass of the Feather acts on it, the feather will move. Otherwise the feather will be at rest at the lowest point it can obtain.

The leaves have less mass than a car. So light wind can easily move the leaves, while the car would require more force.

No because the amount of energy to move any object is relative to its mass. You are mixing up mass with gravity.

Why would that be?

No, the Law of gravity states that matter will ne pulled towards the center of mass. On earth its 9.8 m/s^2

Primarily because density is an characteristic of matter. The reason you can't stick you hand through lead is because of the density of lead. You can stick your hand through water because it's less Dense than your flesh. However Density is not a force. You still need a force to act upon an object to make it move in a direction. Why do balloons float? The helium in the baloon is less dense than air, do it rises above the air, why does the balloon go up instead of to the side of air? Gravity. The air is pulled down and the less dense balloon is pushed to the top of the air. As the helium leaks out of the balloon, the more dense balloon will fall towards the center of gravity.


what force pulls denser objects down? (You are literally describing a renamed version of gravity).

You haven't convinced me yet.

It doesn't matter how many different user names you appear as, you have certain signature characteristics to your posts that make it extremely obvious who you really are.

There is no need to try and convince the opposition who has a specific agenda for all that they post.

That'd be you.

 

[theWind]

Wait... so you don't believe in gravity either?

Gravity is a fiction as fake as the round earth lie.

I believe in what is real, what is visible and repeatably verifiable with empirical experimentation.

What is real is the law of density as I have explained in post #266.

 

[theWind]

Too many problems. Why can you launch a bigger payload into space when you launch it eastward and even more if you launch it closer to the equator?

Why does the Coriolis effect work one way in the Northern Hemisphere and the other way in the Southern hemisphere? Why is there a Coriiolis effect? Why does a Foucault pendulum work?

No, there's just too much of that. Our honest Flat-Earther just ran head-on into another of those things, and being honest, admits that he can't explain it.

You have repeatedly run from viewing a video with two HUNDRED proofs that the Earth is Flat. Two HUNDRED.

That's a collection of evidence containing FAR more facts than necessary to win a Supreme Court case.

Each and every proof, in itself - alone, proves that the earth is flat. There are TWO HUNDRED of them.

Would you like to discuss that, smarty pants?

Nope, you won't even touch it.

Because you can't. You have zero response.

 

[Tall Timbers]

Flat earth isn't a threat, it's just lunacy.

 

[Riven]

Gravity is a fiction as fake as the round earth lie.

 

[theWind]

Flat earth isn't a threat, it's just lunacy.

How often do they have congress hearings/debates and spend many hundreds of millions to censor and silence concepts that are just run-of-the-mill 'lunacy'?

Never.

They have held hearings and gone to great lengths to completely change the way Youtube, and other platforms, operate in order to give the public extra reassurance against the idea that the earth is flat.

On the one hand they say "What difference does it make if it is? Who cares?"

On the other hand they scramble and fret and spend massive amounts of money to desperately convince and reassure the masses that this concept is not anything that anybody should waste their time looking into.

In the end, all of their panicking just causes those with half a brain, and the ability to think for themselves, to look right into it and research it for themselves. All who are sincere come away with a revelation that the earth truly is FLAT after all - and all the dominos begin to fall leading them to many, many other lies perpetrated upon the public for decades and centuries.

 

[theWind]

Speaking of Lunacy.

There's a whole lotta obnoxious laughter in this thread in place of intelligent rebuttals.

I guess we're done here?

Nobody has any cogent arguments left to disprove Flat Earth?

Watch the video and you will be even further convinced that you've arrived at a place of total loss for anything intelligent left to say in opposition to the Flat Earth Truth.

It is what it is.

And it is TRUE.

 

[Barbarian]

You have repeatedly run from viewing a video with two HUNDRED proofs that the Earth is Flat. Two HUNDRED.

Nope. But if you present one"Proof" here at a time, we'll see how well they hold up. What's your best one?
(not expecting to see any such "proof")

 

[Barbarian]

The "proof" in the previous post, using lens distortion...here's a better one...

This guy has the record high-altitude parachute jump. Notice that the image is not distorted (straight lines on the capsule are straight) but the curvature of the Earth is quite visible. One down. What's your next attempt?

 

[Barbarian]

Too many problems.

Why can you launch a bigger payload into space when you launch it eastward and even more if you launch it closer to the equator?

Why does the Coriolis effect work one way in the Northern Hemisphere and the other way in the Southern hemisphere? Why is there a Coriiolis effect? Why does a Foucault pendulum work?

No, there's just too much of that. Our honest Flat-Earther just ran head-on into another of those things, and being honest, admits that he can't explain it.

You have repeatedly run from viewing a video...

Don't blame you for dodging the question. No other flat-Earther can explain these things, either. For reasons you seem to becoming aware of, now.

But put up whatever you think the best proof for a flat Earth might be, and we'll check it out. What do you have?

 

[Riven]

God bless this forum. My sides!