Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Woman Sues Google for Bad Directions

Lewis

Member
Woman Sues Google for Bad Directions

Sarah Jacobsson, PC World

May 31, 2010 7:00 am

One day I was using my cell phone's GPS service to find the nearest Target. I was driving down the road when suddenly my cell phone piped up, "Turn right here." I looked to the right. There was no road, just a tree and some grass. I chalked it up to a GPS glitch and turned right at the next corner.

If I had been Lauren Rosenberg, however, I would have turned right at that very moment, hit the tree, suffered some cuts and minor brain damage, and then turned around and sued Verizon for the glitch in its GPS service.

Seriously.

Search Engine Land reports that Rosenberg, a Los Angeles California native, is suing Google because Google Maps issued directions that told her to walk down a rural highway. She started walking down the highway--which had no sidewalk or pedestrian paths--and was struck by a car. She is suing Google for her medical expenses ($100,000), as well as punitive damages. She is also suing the driver who struck her, Patrick Harwood of Park City, Utah.

On January 19, 2010, Rosenberg was apparently trying to get from 96 Daly Street, Park City, Utah, to 1710 Prospector Avenue, Park City, Utah. She looked up the walking directions using Google Maps on her Blackberry. Google Maps suggested a route that included a half-mile walk down "Deer Valley Drive," which is also known as "Utah State Route 224."

There's not much more to say--she started walking down the middle of a highway, and a car hit her. Who wouldn't have seen that one coming?

According to Rosenberg's complaint filing:

"As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant Google’s careless, reckless and negligent providing of unsafe directions, Plaintiff Lauren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle, causing her to suffer sever permanent physical, emotional, and mental injuries, including pain and suffering."

Google actually does offer up a warning about its walking directions--if you view Google Maps on a computer, it gives you the following message: "Walking directions are in beta. Use caution--This route may be missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths."

This warning does not show up in PDA's and cell phones, however. I suppose Google figured that people who are smart enough to use Blackberries are probably also smart enough to not walk directly into the middle of traffic.

For the record, when I look up driving directions from my current city (San Francisco, California) to the city I grew up in (Tokyo, Japan), Google Maps suggests I kayak across the Pacific Ocean (with a rest stop in Hawaii, of course).

I can't wait until Ms. Rosenberg tries to travel overseas ("The plaintiff was unaware that attempting to kayak 5,100 miles is an unreasonable endeavor").


http://www.pcworld.com/article/197618/w ... tions.html
 
:biglol :rolling :toofunny :splat :eyelid :clap :lol

That's a good one Lewis!!


You know, If anyone has the "right" to sue Google Maps it's ME!!!! They gave us wrong directions to the hotel on our honeymoon (we ended up driving down a dead end road in a sketchy rural area), gave me wrong directions to the doctor's office (nearly missed my appt. trying to find it, had to ask a person for directions), and gave wrong directions to Timothy's sleep study place (it was on the wrong side of the road :) )!!

Needless to day I don't really trust them anymore, but suing them??? Surely that dumbo won't win her case :crazy
 
When I first heard of this, the first thing that popped into my head was a certain episode of The Office. lol
 
Free said:
When I first heard of this, the first thing that popped into my head was a certain episode of The Office. lol
:biglol :rolling
That was excellent. :D
 
Google should counter sue. On what grounds? Stupidity. At first, I thought "What again? Another person walks into a heavy traffic area and blames Google??" It turns out to the same person. Oh well.
 
Barry Brindisi said:
Google should counter sue. On what grounds? Stupidity. At first, I thought "What again? Another person walks into a heavy traffic area and blames Google??" It turns out to the same person. Oh well.
Yeah well, you can literally sue for anything it seems. I'd really love to see that court case! :biglol
 
Welcome to 21st Century America, I suppose...

A mother sued her boyfriend for getting her pregnant, and then she attempted to sue her own baby for ruining her life. When both of those failed, she attempted to sue her childhood church and her parents for instilling moral right and wrongs about abortion into her. A femi-nazi group actually funded her for that lawsuit and when the judge dismissed it for being stupid the woman turned around and tried to sue the femi-nazis for giving her false-hope.

The saddest part about that story I told you is that it is all very, very true. People will, and do, sue for anything these days. It would almost be better if they simply closed down our judicial system.

For a school field trip we visited the state supreme court. I got to have lunch with one of the justices, pure luck. He informed me that the Connecticut courts are backed up for the next five years in ridiculous lawsuits alone. He told me that a couple, who was trying to get a divorce and also had a second lawsuit against one another, ended up suing the state of Connecticut (as a couple) for making them wait so long to get a divorce.

This is what the world has come too. It's so very, very sad.
 
Barry Brindisi said:
Google should counter sue. On what grounds? Stupidity. At first, I thought "What again? Another person walks into a heavy traffic area and blames Google??" It turns out to the same person. Oh well.

haha totally agree!!! men stupidity
 
A friend of mine, who's a lawyer, once told me about a man who came to him. He said he had ordered a product from abroad through a catalogue, and when the product arrived, it turned out to be defective. He contacted the people who had sold it to him, but they refused to take it back and give him a refund, so he wanted to sue them. Before deciding whether to take the case, my friend needed some more information, such as what the product was, from what country he had ordered it and what the defect was, so he asked him about it. The man explained that the product (yes, he did use that word) was a woman he had ordered from Nigeria and the defect was that she had both syphillis and Tuberculosis. Needless to say, my friend refused to take the case. For some reason, this guy had a real hard time finding any lawyer who would take his case. Last I heard (which was a couple of decades ago) he was going to represent himself.

:screwloose
 
Woman Sues Google for Bad Directions

Sarah Jacobsson, PC World

May 31, 2010 7:00 am

One day I was using my cell phone's GPS service to find the nearest Target. I was driving down the road when suddenly my cell phone piped up, "Turn right here." I looked to the right. There was no road, just a tree and some grass. I chalked it up to a GPS glitch and turned right at the next corner.

If I had been Lauren Rosenberg, however, I would have turned right at that very moment, hit the tree, suffered some cuts and minor brain damage, and then turned around and sued Verizon for the glitch in its GPS service.

Seriously.

Search Engine Land reports that Rosenberg, a Los Angeles California native, is suing Google because Google Maps issued directions that told her to walk down a rural highway. She started walking down the highway--which had no sidewalk or pedestrian paths--and was struck by a car. She is suing Google for her medical expenses ($100,000), as well as punitive damages. She is also suing the driver who struck her, Patrick Harwood of Park City, Utah.

On January 19, 2010, Rosenberg was apparently trying to get from 96 Daly Street, Park City, Utah, to 1710 Prospector Avenue, Park City, Utah. She looked up the walking directions using Google Maps on her Blackberry. Google Maps suggested a route that included a half-mile walk down "Deer Valley Drive," which is also known as "Utah State Route 224."

There's not much more to say--she started walking down the middle of a highway, and a car hit her. Who wouldn't have seen that one coming?

According to Rosenberg's complaint filing:

"As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant Google’s careless, reckless and negligent providing of unsafe directions, Plaintiff Lauren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle, causing her to suffer sever permanent physical, emotional, and mental injuries, including pain and suffering."

Google actually does offer up a warning about its walking directions--if you view Google Maps on a computer, it gives you the following message: "Walking directions are in beta. Use caution--This route may be missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths."

This warning does not show up in PDA's and cell phones, however. I suppose Google figured that people who are smart enough to use Blackberries are probably also smart enough to not walk directly into the middle of traffic.

For the record, when I look up driving directions from my current city (San Francisco, California) to the city I grew up in (Tokyo, Japan), Google Maps suggests I kayak across the Pacific Ocean (with a rest stop in Hawaii, of course).

I can't wait until Ms. Rosenberg tries to travel overseas ("The plaintiff was unaware that attempting to kayak 5,100 miles is an unreasonable endeavor").


http://www.pcworld.com/article/197618/w ... tions.html

kayak across the ocean, yes it does say to do that.lol
 
He started in San Francisco, California. Look what entry 11 says to do.

197618-googlegps1_original.jpg


Why does it start by telling him to go north, when he should be going south?
 
A friend of mine, who's a lawyer, once told me about a man who came to him. He said he had ordered a product from abroad through a catalogue, and when the product arrived, it turned out to be defective. He contacted the people who had sold it to him, but they refused to take it back and give him a refund, so he wanted to sue them. Before deciding whether to take the case, my friend needed some more information, such as what the product was, from what country he had ordered it and what the defect was, so he asked him about it. The man explained that the product (yes, he did use that word) was a woman he had ordered from Nigeria and the defect was that she had both syphillis and Tuberculosis. Needless to say, my friend refused to take the case. For some reason, this guy had a real hard time finding any lawyer who would take his case. Last I heard (which was a couple of decades ago) he was going to represent himself.

:screwloose
Was that real, you are not joking around ?
 
Back
Top