- Oct 20, 2016
And of course you can prove your insinuation that Timothy Funds are not biblically responsible, correct?....or are you simply spouting your opinion without evidence?.......I am waiting to read your evidence. You also have evidence that his support of these funds is because "his advice is scarcely disinterested'? Something tells me you have nothing but let's see.......Basically he is relentlessly shilling for a supposedly "Biblically responsible" family of investment funds. They are, of course, one of his main sponsors, so his advice is scarcely disinterested. I have actually thought of contacting the Federal Trade Commission about whether he should be required to make more disclosures when he pushes unsophisticated callers toward these funds, but so far I have concluded that perhaps his "ministry" (as he characterizes it) does more good than harm.
These funds are theoretically "Biblically responsible" because they do not invest in companies that support pornography, gambling, abortion and other such nastiness. Ergo, God supposedly smiles upon your shekels when you place them with these funds.
Do you have evidence that claim has ever been made or again are you simply making accusations without any evidence? My understanding is that this forum frowns upon that........
Hmmmm, wonder why you have not bothered to mention Mission Pre-Born?......Maybe because it does not fit your leftist narrative?Animal cruelty, weapons of mass destruction, shady political activities, unbridled greed, business ethics that would make The Donald blush - does Dan Celia care about any of these? No, just stay away from companies that actively support pornography, gambling and abortion and God will be happy. What a pathetic joke!