Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

John 15:1-6 and loss of slvation

Donations

Total amount
$1,642.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Interesting. What is the difference in eternal life to come and eternal life now?
Eternal life to come isn't a reality yet. So if I'm saved, and I don't right then have eternal life, it is yet to come. Eternal life now means I have crossed over from death to life and that life (eternal life) is now. Also, to have eternal life is to have it now (presently). 1 John 5:13 I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.

John didn't way, "will have" but "have."
 
What I've always struggled with is this;

Hebrews 6:1-3
1 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God,
2 and of instruction about washings, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.
3 And this we will do if God permits
.

I believe there is a time and place for these discussions, but sometimes I wonder if we pursue this from our own desire or if God desires us to remain in discussion.

Either way, it does let us know there is a lot more that could be discussed. Just sayin. Not that I want to quit this one though. It just popped in my mind.
 
I guess WE can just write it off to a case of ignorance on the part of Eastern Orthodoxy
Right!
Go with the new wind of doctrine instead of what had been taught since the beginning.
'cause Protestants are so much smarter than all the saints of the previous 1500 years.
Great plan!
 
What I've always struggled with is this;

Hebrews 6:1-3
1 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God,
2 and of instruction about washings, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.
3 And this we will do if God permits
.

I believe there is a time and place for these discussions, but sometimes I wonder if we pursue this from our own desire or if God desires us to remain in discussion.

Either way, it does let us know there is a lot more that could be discussed. Just sayin. Not that I want to quit this one though. It just popped in my mind.
You make a good point. We have many differences. We have many similarities. God is not caught off guard regarding this. We spend more time debating OSAS and very little on this: Hebrews 10: 23Let us hold resolutely to the hope we confess, for He who promised is faithful. 24And let us consider how to spur one another on to love and good deeds. 25Let us not neglect meeting together, as some have made a habit, but let us encourage one another, and all the more as you see the Day approaching.…

OSAS discussion can be fun (done right) but are not profitable.
 
OSAS discussion can be fun (done right) but are not profitable.
Personally, I find the OSAS gospel to encourage a lackadaisical attitude toward doing what Jesus commanded us to do. If there is no consequence for not obeying the teaching of scripture with reference to good works, then why bother? And the result can be seen in churches that set no standards for Christian praxis and a neo-pagan culture arisen in Europe and the Americas because the Christians don't appear to be any different from the pagans.

So, IMHO, the revelation of the fallacies of the OSAS gospel are of great profit to the Church in that, people just might wake up to the fact that, if people are going to call themselves Christians, they had best start acting like Christians, lest, after 50+ years of steady church attendance and tithing they hear the Lord say to them: "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me."

OSAS is a variation of cheap grace. It is a curse to the Church.

Imho.

iakov the fool
 
Of course it's not but let's hear it.
You too!????

How many times have I posted the passages that refute that false gospel?

What should make me imagine that suddenly, someone dedicated to OSAS will get it this time?

Go back and read the OP.

Iakov the fool
 
Personally, I find the OSAS gospel to encourage a lackadaisical attitude toward doing what Jesus commanded us to do. If there is no consequence for not obeying the teaching of scripture with reference to good works, then why bother? And the result can be seen in churches that set no standards for Christian praxis and a neo-pagan culture arisen in Europe and the Americas because the Christians don't appear to be any different from the pagans.

So, IMHO, the revelation of the fallacies of the OSAS gospel are of great profit to the Church in that, people just might wake up to the fact that, if people are going to call themselves Christians, they had best start acting like Christians, lest, after 50+ years of steady church attendance and tithing they hear the Lord say to them: "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me."

OSAS is a variation of cheap grace. It is a curse to the Church.

Imho.

iakov the fool

I don't subscribe to the term OSAS anyway. I think it's a poorly used term. I've never heard a sermon that promoted OSAS and never had a discussion with other Believers from my church where we ever mentioned it. It's only in discussion groups like this that I hear about it.

I think God is a God who keep His promises. Jesus says he will keep us. Make us able to stand to the end. God seals us. We're grafted into the body. There are many promises that show we have eternal life now. And God is the one who decides how it works. He decides to forgive on His terms.

John MacArthur speaks against easy believism and yet is outspoken on eternal security. I doubt we have the same idea of that biblical concept. True faith in Christ always leads to a changed life. And it always leads to a permanent change. If a person's change is temporary, they were not among us. 1 John 2:19

A person cannot pray a prayer and then call themselves a believer and that's it. If they don't show fruit of repentance, the repentance is false. If a person claims to be a Christian but lives a life that doesn't demonstrate godly living, it's unlikely they are "among us" (they are not saved to begin with).

If you are in fact saved so that if you die this moment, you will be with Christ, you will always have this position in Christ no matter when you die. God judges the heart (1 Samuel 6:17). We can't see it, but God can.
 
2.4: No Trolling. Do not make an inflammatory remark just to get a response. Address issues not personalities. Respect where people are in their spiritual walk, and respect all others in general. Respect where others are in their spiritual walk, do not disrupt the flow of discussion or act in a way that affects others negatively including when debating doctrinal issues, in the defense of the Christian faith, and in offering unwelcome spiritual advice.

do not reply to this post in this thread..
 
We're grafted into the body.
Rom 11:19-21 You will say, "Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in." That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast only through faith. So do not become proud, but stand in awe. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you.
I think God is a God who keep His promises. Jesus says he will keep us.
It's not a question of God keeping His promises; He always does.
It is a question of believers staying the course.
The OSAS, Preservation of the Saints, eternal Security, or whatever name that malarkey is given are all based in the assumption that, one a person makes a decision, he surrenders his free will and no longer has the ability to become apostate.

But Hebrews specifically states that is not the case. A born again believer can commit apostasy.
Heb 6:4-6 For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, if they then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.
Why would the writer of Hebrews make such a comment if it were not possible for a believer to commit apostasy? Was he not telling the truth?

Scripture says that we will be saved IF we continue in the faith.

Definition of the word “if” per http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
a : in the event that
b : allowing that
c : on the assumption that
d : on condition that

The word “if” introduces a potential outcome based on a condition.
Ex: “If (in the event that, allowing that, on the assumption that, on condition that) you eat that mushroom (the condition) you may die. (the potential outcome)
Ex. “if (in the event that, allowing that, on the assumption that, on condition that) any one's name was not found written in the book of life, (the condition) he was thrown in the lake of fire. (the potential outcome) (Rev 20:15 RSV
Ex: if (in the event that, allowing that, on the assumption that, on condition that) Christ has not been raised, (the condition) then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. (the potential outcome) (1 Cor 15:14 RSV)

It logically follows that the failure to meet the condition will result in the potential outcome not coming to pass. So, with reference to the first example, if you do NOT eat the mushroom you will not die from the effects of eating it.

COL 1:21-23 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight —IF YOU CONTINUE IN YOUR FAITH, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.
The outcome of being “reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight” is contingent upon the condition that “YOU CONTINUE IN YOUR FAITH, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.

It follows logically that is one does NOT “YOU CONTINUE IN YOUR FAITH, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel,” (fails to meet the condition) then the potential outcome of of being “reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight” will not become a reality.

HEB 3:14 We have come to share in Christ IF WE HOLD FIRMLY TILL THE END THE CONFIDENCE WE HAD AT FIRST.
The logically inferred opposite outcome of the opposite condition: If we DO NOT hold firmly then we HAVE NOT come to share in Christ.

2 PE 1:5-10 For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love. For IF you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But if anyone does not have them, he is nearsighted and blind, and has forgotten that he has been cleansed from his past sins. Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For IF YOU DO THESE THINGS, YOU WILL NEVER FALL,
The logically inferred opposite outcome of the opposite condition: If you DO NOT DO these things the possibility of falling is a reality.

True faith in Christ always leads to a changed life.
Yes, I've heard that exercise in circular illogic more times than I can count.
A - "He had faith at first but he fall away."
B - "If he fell away then her really didn't have "true faith."
A' - "How do you know that?"
B' - "Because if he had "true faith," he wouldn't fall away."
B' is NOT a proof of B. It is merely a restatement of B. It is an exercise in gibberish.
John MacArthur speaks against easy believism and yet is outspoken on eternal security.
I find John McArthur's apologetic lacking in several areas.
A person cannot pray a prayer and then call themselves a believer and that's it. If they don't show fruit of repentance, the repentance is false. If a person claims to be a Christian but lives a life that doesn't demonstrate godly living, it's unlikely they are "among us" (they are not saved to begin with).
I find that most Churches do not encourage believers to "bear fruit that befits repentance." (Mat 3:8) Normally, the bigger the church, the lower the standards.

People interpret "saved by grace" as meaning there is nothing anyone need to do and nothing anyone does can ever terminate his "saved" status. Really? Drunkenness? Theft? Fornication? Rape? Murder? Take another look at 1 Cor 6:9-10.
If you are in fact saved so that if you die this moment, you will be with Christ, you will always have this position in Christ no matter when you die.
How about someone "gets saved", follows the Lord for decades and then gets tangled in an adulterous affair (like as happens with Pastors on an all too regular basis) and dies before he comes to his senses and repents? Does he "go to heaven" because, when he "got saved" he real;ly did have "true faith" but just got side-tracked in a moment of weakness?

A believer only has "eternal security" if he stays on the straight and narrow path until his last breath. Once he has breathed his last, THEN, he has eternal security and not a moment before in spite of what the Johnnys-come-lately Calvins andMcarthurs have to say.

Here, read it again:
Jhn 15:1-6 (NIV)
I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener.
He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes[fn] so that it will be even more fruitful.

You are already clean because of the word I have spoken to you.
Remain in me, as I also remain in you. No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me.
I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.

If you do not remain in me, (that means it is possible to separate from Christ) you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned.


That passage identifies two classes of "true believers" (as indicated by they're being In Me" or, as Paul puts it "in Christ.") who do not stay "saved."
(1) Those who bear no fruit. (Do not do the good works in which God created them to walk.)
(2) Those who do not remain "in Me. ) )Paul: "In Christ.")
Both of them forfeit their connection to Christ in whom is life (John 1:14) and, thereby, loose their "eternal security."

And there is much more in the scriptures to support the death of "OSAS," "Preservation of the Saints", or "Eternal Security."


iakov the fool
 
I firmly believe in eternal salvation (OSAS).. After reading the parables and the Scriptures provided, it's shaken my foundation to the core and because of what I am reading.. I have to say thanks.. You have strengthen my resolve!

 
Right!
Go with the new wind of doctrine instead of what had been taught since the beginning.
'cause Protestants are so much smarter than all the saints of the previous 1500 years.
Great plan!
Now, now.....don't starting insulting entire segments of Christianity......what would your saints think of such an approach?
 
I find that most Churches do not encourage believers to "bear fruit that befits repentance." (Mat 3:8) Normally, the bigger the church, the lower the standards.
Maybe that's because you will find people at all levels in their walk with Messiah from those struggling to believe to those who have walked with him for years. IIRC Messiah had some 'low standards' also eating and associating with sinners; maybe all churches should have such 'low standards'.
 
The Father awaited the son well before the son initiated any action.
True, but what if the son had never returned?

On a side note, I like how you approach this discussion. This is a topic in which I am standing on the fence and I enjoy reading the various comments. Unfortunately too many of the counter arguments lack compassion and it can be discouraging. It is much more refreshing to read when others are treated with respect and brotherly love rather than with disdain.
 
Last edited:
Then it is not a gift. I've earned it and the Cross of Christ was not sufficient. It's Jesus plus me = salvation.
This is exactly the mistake I've been saying the church has been making. You're making believing a damnable work of the works gospel.
Show me the passage that explains that trusting in Christ is also among the works of the damnable works gospel.

The distorted and inaccurate reasoning has been, "well, since salvation is by nothing at all, then surely if I have to believe in order to stay saved I'm doing something to save myself". But believing is exactly the thing that Paul contrasts with doing works to be declared righteousness:

"4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness" (Romans 4:4-5 NASB bold and underline mine)

See it? To be justified, believing is being contrasted with works, not equated with them. But somehow in the Protestant church, trusting/believing got moved over to the side of 'works' in Paul's 'faith vs. works for justification' argument.
 
Romans 5:7-10 (LEB) For only rarely will someone die on behalf of a righteous person for on behalf of a good person possibly someone might even dare to die, but God demonstrates his own love for us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Therefore, by much more, because we have been declared righteous now by his blood, we will be saved through him from the wrath. For if, while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, by much more, having been reconciled, we will be saved by his life.

Since Christ died for us while we were still in sin (unbelief), just how much more of a demonstration does one need to prove that we will be saved through Him (His life, not ours)???
 
The OSAS, Preservation of the Saints, eternal Security, or whatever name that malarkey is given are all based in the assumption that, one a person makes a decision, he surrenders his free will and no longer has the ability to become apostate.
Did Abram exercise his free will and oppose the will of God, choosing to remain at home with his family rather than setting out to a new land?
Did Moses exercise his free will and oppose the will of God, choosing to remain with the sheep rather than return to Egypt?
Did Pharaoh exercise his free will and oppose the will of God, choosing to soften his heart when God would harden it as a demonstration of His power?
Did Saul exercise his free will and oppose the will of God, choosing to remain a Pharisee rather than becoming an Apostle to the Gentiles?

So who are these people who exercise their free will in opposition to the will of God?

More importantly, notice a common theme ... Abram did not seek God, Moses did not seek God, Saul did not seek Jesus. In each case, God initiated contact and did the choosing. God loved and commanded ... his people, his sheep, his possession obey and follow.

That is how it was for me, too.
God chose me, I did not seek him.
I respond in love and obedience to his loving call and embrace (I can do no other).

It feels like monergism to this sinner saved by grace.
 
Last edited:
This is exactly the mistake I've been saying the church has been making. You're making believing a damnable work of the works gospel.
Show me the passage that explains that trusting in Christ is also among the works of the damnable works gospel.

The distorted and inaccurate reasoning has been, "well, since salvation is by nothing at all, then surely if I have to believe in order to stay saved I'm doing something to save myself". But believing is exactly the thing that Paul contrasts with doing works to be declared righteousness:

"4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness" (Romans 4:4-5 NASB bold and underline mine)

See it? To be justified, believing is being contrasted with works, not equated with them. But somehow in the Protestant church, trusting/believing got moved over to the side of 'works' in Paul's 'faith vs. works for justification' argument.
Ephesians 2:8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God

Yet even our faith (belief) comes from God ... does it not?
(thus it was never on the works side of the equation - good or bad works).
 

Donations

Total amount
$1,642.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Back
Top