Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Don't you think Jesus's own words in Matthew Chapter 28 would be sufficient ?How do you defend the trinity from the Bible alone?
18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. |
19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: |
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. |
How do you defend the trinity from the Bible alone?
Bible why do you need to defend the Trinity as the carnal mind can not perceive the things of the Spirit.
For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. 1 John 5:7
Good point. Thank you for correcting my error. I think I'm using the word defend in a different way. I deleted my post.FHG,
How, then, do you answer the content of 1 Peter 3:15 (ESV), "But in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect"?
If I follow your statement, I would have wasted years of my life in defending the Christian faith, including the Trinity. In addition, I would have been disobedient to the Word of God (1 Pet 3:15 ESV).
The carnal mind needs apologia (apologetics) combined with the Holy Spirit's dynamite to break through the stubborn heart. I must never give up on the "carnal mind" because of the Spirit's power.
Oz
JLB,
Those are not the words of the earliest MSS: "7 For there are three that testify: 8 the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree" (1 Jn 5:7-8 ESV).
Oz
You cannot arrive at orthodox Trinitarian theology using sola Scriptura.
I dont recognize those newer translations. They tend to leave out verses.
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
1 John 5:7 KJV
For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.
1 John 5:7 NKJV
If your study of scripture leads you to conclude that the Eternal Godhead, the Elohim is not Three, then so be it.
JLB
We shouldn’t have to defend the Trinity.
We should share it with those that have a hunger to receive it.
JLB,
You won't understand the different translations of 1 John 5:7 until you recognize the KJV and NKJV you cited are based on the Textus Receptus Greek MSS of Erasmus in 1516, while the newer translations are based on the United Bible Societies eclectic Greek text - using earlier MSS.
When did Erasmus compile the Textus Receptus?
Oz
You cannot arrive at orthodox Trinitarian theology using sola Scriptura.
Athanasius Creed!These are some of my attempts to understand the Trinity from a biblical perspective:
Oz
What specifically are "the earliest MSS"?JLB,
Those are not the words of the earliest MSS: "7 For there are three that testify: 8 the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree" (1 Jn 5:7-8 ESV).
Oz
There is some faulty logic! The newer translations are based on more and better manuscripts, coupled with many non-Biblical documents that aid in understanding the ancient languages and cultures. The KJV is both dated and inaccurate.I dont recognize those newer translations. They tend to leave out verses.
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
1 John 5:7 KJV
For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.
1 John 5:7 NKJV
If your study of scripture leads you to conclude that the Eternal Godhead, the Elohim is not Three, then so be it.
JLB
There is some faulty logic! The newer translations are based on more and better manuscripts, coupled with many non-Biblical documents that aid in understanding the ancient languages and cultures. The KJV is both dated and inaccurate.
What does "If your study of scripture leads you to conclude that the Eternal Godhead, the Elohim is not Three" mean? On what do you base this conclusion?