I see your denial. But your attempts to revise scripture are out here for everyone to see.
I see your denial. But your attempts to revise scripture are out here for everyone to see.
Everything operating under physics ultimately winds down. 1st and 2nd laws.As you just demonstrated, you don't understand what entropy is or how it works.
What do you believe that the processes needed are? EVOLUTION is ruled out, and so is significant unguided additions to the DNA.Show me one process, required for evolution that is ruled out by "entropy." Show your calculations. Prediction; we aren't going to see anything like that.
Creation researchers have found that “kind” is often at the level of “family” in our modern classification scheme. For example, zebras, horses, and donkeys all belong to the family Equidae and can mate with each other to form hybrid animals such as mules (from a horse and donkey) and zonkeys (from a zebra and donkey). However, there is no reason to assume a one-to-one correspondence between our manmade system and the biblical terminology. So “kind” may be at a higher taxonomic level in some cases, lower in others.But if you doubt this, show us a testable definition for "created kind."
God placed the potential for tremendous variety within the original created kinds. This original variation, altered by genetic mutations and other mechanisms after the Fall (such as natural selection), led to the great diversity of living things we see today.
A modern field of study, called baraminology (from the two Hebrew words bara, meaning “created,” and min, meaning “kind”), attempts to classify fossil and living organisms into their original created kinds (or baramins). This is an active area of creation research. As creation scientists, we are not ashamed to stand on the foundation of God’s Word for our research and understanding of living things.
According to Genesis 1, God made each type of creature “according to its kind.” Within their DNA, God placed the potential for tremendous variety, including new species. But every species belongs to its original kind—cats are still cats, and dogs are dogs.
Obviously, it's not species or genus. It's closer to family. Just use your eyes; does it look like a hippo? It's probably a hippo! You don't need to be a Creationist to know that animals give birth after their kind.Creationists are all over the map on this. Most seem to say "genus" but others say "species", "family" or even higher taxa.
Also, which creationists? Are they Christian? There's muslim ones too, i think.
No. The cat kind is all one.So, the "cat kind" is really several kinds? You sure? You just defined "species."
Ironic post of the day award. Why do you (indirectly) insist that God is a cobbler and not a Creator??You can only offer vague definitions, because your notion of "created kinds" is an imaginary thing. Not knowing that you attempt to serve 2 masters (God and creationism) is what hurts you.
How is serving God and believing Creation serving 2 masters?? Goofy.
What's imaginary is 'god the cobbler' of the compromised believer as opposed to JESUS THE OMNIPOTENT CREATOR of the Solid Christian.
WHICH 'vague definitions'??
Genesis never indicates evolution once. Jesus took Genesis literally.For the same reason it's called creation and not gravity. Creation is all of it. Gravity and evolution are just to phenomena that are part of creation. This is why it seems like you've never even read Genesis.
There's literally a website named AnswersinGenesis.org. I suggest visiting it.