[__ Science __ ] Noahs Flood explained and Evolution refuted.

[Paul E. Michael]

I asked Barbarian:

By your phrase, "the NT canon", are you just referring to the NT, that is, to the 27 books that are the NT? Yes or No?

Barbarian: <NO ANSWER>

 

[Paul E. Michael]

Development of the New Testament canon - Wikipedia

By your parroted-from-Wikipedia phrase, "development of the New Testament canon", are you just referring to the writing of the 27 God-breathed books that are the New Testament? Yes or No?

 

[Paul E. Michael]

That was one of the later persecutions, yes.

Yes, the Roman Papacy's persecution of Christians was, indeed, later than the time of Diocletian.

 

[Barbarian]

Yes, the Roman Papacy's persecution of Christians was, indeed, later than the time of Diocletian.

If you loved God as much as you hate other Christians, you'd be much better off.

 

[Paul E. Michael]

If you loved God as much as you hate other Christians, you'd be much better off.

Why do you so venomously hate the Christians brutally murdered by the Roman Papacy throughout the Dark Ages?

 

[Barbarian]

Says the "scholar" who is ignorant of something as elementary as the difference between "who" and "whom":

Whom often sounds fussy and unnatural in regular speech and writing, even when it is technically correct (e.g. "It depends on whom you ask"). In these cases, it's perfectly standard to use who instead.

How to Use 'Who' vs. 'Whom'

What you really need to know

www.merriam-webster.com

What Winston Churchill referred to as "arrant pedantry." It's OK to end a sentence in a preposition, also. And you are imagining that I described myself as "a scholar."

I'm just an old barbarian. And you know how ungrammatical barbarians can be.

 

[Barbarian]

Why do you so venomously hate the Christians brutally murdered by the Roman Papacy throughout the Dark Ages?

The Protestants and Catholics of the Reformation have plenty of blood and guilt to go around. Don't let it pull you down with them.

I seem to be making you more and more agitated. Perhaps a few days without seeing my comments would be good for you. I'll be back then if you still want to talk. Until then, may God bless and comfort you.

 

[Paul E. Michael]

Whom often sounds fussy and unnatural in regular speech and writing, even when it is technically correct (e.g. "It depends on whom you ask"). In these cases, it's perfectly standard to use who instead.

No it doesn't. But parroting other peoples' ravings because you can't even come up with your own words in your futile attempt to whitewash, and save face in light of your glaring failure at elementary grammar, sounds -- and is -- downright pathetic.

I'm just an old barbarian. And you know how ungrammatical barbarians can be.

You're what? In your 70s, no? There, once again, you and I fundamentally disagree: I have never thought of 70s as old.

 

[Paul E. Michael]

The Protestants and Catholics of the Reformation have plenty of blood and guilt to go around. Don't let it pull you down with them.

I seem to be making you more and more agitated. Perhaps a few days without seeing my comments would be good for you. I'll be back then if you still want to talk. Until then, may God bless and comfort you.

LOL

Right back at you, Sir!

 

[follower]

Why do you so venomously hate the Christians brutally murdered by the Roman Papacy throughout the Dark Ages?

In general it seems that those who believe and carry around any false gospel hate Jesus, and His followers.

 

[Barbarian]

In general it seems that those who believe and carry around any false gospel hate Jesus, and His followers.

I don't think that SDAs or even YE creationists in general, hate Jesus or those of us who follow Him. As I mentioned, many of them live lives that are a credit to their belief in God.

They are wrong, not heretics or Jesus-haters. And they are no less Christians than the rest of us.