Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Most definitely agree. 8-)Japheth's seed mixed with Shem's and thus they became nations/gentiles in different lands. May be prophetic.
Darrell dunn said:He will be a politician not religious,
And according to Daniel he will comes from the part of the world the Muslims own, but it says he will not regard the God of his fathers, this dose not say Jehovah.
Um, does 1 John 2:18 and 1 John 2:22 count?Georges said:As to the False Messiah not being religious....why then is he called a False Messiah? He isn't actually called antichrist in the Bible...that is a name ascribed to him by theologians.
:-DAlso, for not being religious...he has a religious prophet proclaiming him to be the Messiah. It is understood in Judaism that Messiah will rule from Jerusalem and officiate temple worship. The False Messiah will try and fool the people by having his false elijah proclaim himself Messiah in Jerusalem and he will sit in the tribulation temple desecrating it.
See Tefillin <-- link for details.Also, for not being religious...he (the false prophet, false elijah) has a religious icon placed upon the hand or forehead of his followers. This is a counterfiet of the mark (seal) on the 144000.
2 Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.Also, for not being religious....he sit's in a religeous temple and proclaims himself to be God.....that's pretty religious...
Vic said:Um, does 1 John 2:18 and 1 John 2:22 count?
When I first found out about the tefillin, the FIRST thing that came to mind was the Mark and... the sealed 144,000. I believe it is a tefillin that seals 144,000. Hey, it's identifiable and the 144,000 will be protected, so it doesn't matter who sees it. They will be "untouchable". :wavy said:... And I completely forgot about teffillin. So in addition to tzitzit, I'll have to get teffilin too. Glad you brought that up. I also tied in that passage with the mark once.
My parents thought I was crazy.
See Tefillin <-- link for details.Vic said:Um, does 1 John 2:18 and 1 John 2:22 count?Georges said:As to the False Messiah not being religious....why then is he called a False Messiah? He isn't actually called antichrist in the Bible...that is a name ascribed to him by theologians.
:-DAlso, for not being religious...he has a religious prophet proclaiming him to be the Messiah. It is understood in Judaism that Messiah will rule from Jerusalem and officiate temple worship. The False Messiah will try and fool the people by having his false elijah proclaim himself Messiah in Jerusalem and he will sit in the tribulation temple desecrating it.
Dan 11:45 And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.
Jerusalem sits between the Mediterranean and Dead Seas and is over 1,600 feet above sea level.
[quote:4c144]Also, for not being religious...he (the false prophet, false elijah) has a religious icon placed upon the hand or forehead of his followers. This is a counterfiet of the mark (seal) on the 144000.
2 Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.[/quote:4c144]Also, for not being religious....he sit's in a religeous temple and proclaims himself to be God.....that's pretty religious...
wavy said:I understand what you are saying, Vic. However, Revelation makes it clear that the Name of the Father (YHWH) is what they are sealed with. It only mentions the forehead, not the hand/arm.
Revelation 7:3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
It becomes clear what this seal is:
Revelation 14:1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's Name written in their foreheads.
Yahweh's Name is in the Shema, but this does not seem to tie in with teffilin. The mark does, though. So I don't know, or can't see it right now, as to how the mark is a counterfeit to what the 144,000 are sealed with.
Clear as a "bell" George. Thanks. :angel:Was any of the "shin" "waw" stuff clear....as I said the "shin" is the letter that is under my call name. If you separate the base for each arm of the "shin" you get 3 "waw"'s, or numerically 666. Remember Revelation is a Hebrew book so the number/letter correspondence is Hebrew not Greek.
Georges said:The "shin" looks like a W and is the first letter in God's name of El Shaddai. The S in english looks like the W.
What is neat is that the box that the Jews were on their foreheads have the shin, but also the tefillin that they wrap around their wrists and hands form a "shin" also.
Another interesting thing about the "shin". If you look at a topological map of Jerusalem, you will see that the valley's and hills form a "shin". This goes perfectly with....
Neh 1:9 But [if] ye turn unto me, and keep my commandments, and do them; though there were of you cast out unto the uttermost part of the heaven, [yet] will I gather them from thence, and will bring them unto the place that I have chosen to set my name there.
Was any of the "shin" "waw" stuff clear....as I said the "shin" is the letter that is under my call name. If you separate the base for each arm of the "shin" you get 3 "waw"'s, or numerically 666. Remember Revelation is a Hebrew book so the number/letter correspondence is Hebrew not Greek.
wavy said:Georges said:The "shin" looks like a W and is the first letter in God's name of El Shaddai. The S in english looks like the W.
The problem I have with this, though, is El Shaddai is not a name.
Not quite....it is a name and it is a title....It is one of God's names by it's description. Just like "The Sultan of Swat" is a name given to the baseball Great Babe Ruth. The "Sultan of Swat" is a name of Babe Ruth. It is a descriptive title and name at the same time. Here is a portion of the Jewishencyclopedia.com article on "God"...
In Ex. vi. 2 Yhwh is identified with El-Shaddai, the god of the Patriarchs. What the latter name means is still in doubt (see Nöldeke in "Z. D. M. G." 1886, p. 735; 1888, p. 480). Modern authorities have argued from the statement in Exodus that Yhwh was not known among the Hebrews before Moses, and have therefore insisted that the name at least, if not the god, was of foreign origin. Delitzsch's alleged discovery of the name "Yhwh" on Babylonian tablets has yet to be verified. Moses is held to have identified a Midianite-Kenite deity with the patriarchal El-Shaddai.
who better than the premier reference of Judacia to confirm the above.
What is neat is that the box that the Jews were on their foreheads have the shin, but also the tefillin that they wrap around their wrists and hands form a "shin" also.
Another interesting thing about the "shin". If you look at a topological map of Jerusalem, you will see that the valley's and hills form a "shin". This goes perfectly with....
Neh 1:9 But [if] ye turn unto me, and keep my commandments, and do them; though there were of you cast out unto the uttermost part of the heaven, [yet] will I gather them from thence, and will bring them unto the place that I have chosen to set my name there.
Yahrushalayhim. That's what I thought that was a reference to.
Both......have you looked at the topographical layout yet?.....God could have put the city anywhere....why did he choose an area that had his name stamped on the very ground....coincidence? Nah.....
[quote:3a27b]Was any of the "shin" "waw" stuff clear....as I said the "shin" is the letter that is under my call name. If you separate the base for each arm of the "shin" you get 3 "waw"'s, or numerically 666. Remember Revelation is a Hebrew book so the number/letter correspondence is Hebrew not Greek.
Georges said:who better than the premier reference of Judacia to confirm the above.
Both......have you looked at the topographical layout yet?.....God could have put the city anywhere....why did he choose an area that had his name stamped on the very ground....coincidence? Nah..
Plain and simple everything the devil and/or the False Messiah are going to do is a counterfeit of God, so the marks between God's people and False Messiah's people have to be similar.
wavy said:Georges said:who better than the premier reference of Judacia to confirm the above.
They are refuted with plain scripture, the ultimate authority on everything. Anyone reading Genesis knows that Yahweh's name was known long before Moses. Anyone reading the rest of the Tanach can see that the Name of YHWH is clearly specified as the Father's Name and that it is exalted above all other names and endures forever.
Both......have you looked at the topographical layout yet?.....God could have put the city anywhere....why did he choose an area that had his name stamped on the very ground....coincidence? Nah..
Kabalaa has little interesting coincidences with comparing numbers and letters too. This is speculative. It's not like there's overwhelming evidence to come to this conclusion. His Name is Yahweh. Even if El Shaddai was a name, it still would not take precedence over YHWH.
[quote:49ca8]Plain and simple everything the devil and/or the False Messiah are going to do is a counterfeit of God, so the marks between God's people and False Messiah's people have to be similar.