JudaicChristian
Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 1,793
- 0
The Serpent and it's seed says that we will not surly die, but God and Yahshua say that we will die. So who do you think is telling the truth?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
you seem to like us hebrews as the reference , so then you dont accept hell but heaven? odd the jews say neither may be or both. they really dont know. they dont focus on the afterlife but in the here and now. after perhaps that verses about heaven could be a parable too.mdo757 said:OK then, ET or Messenger. Who decides? In the Old Testament the Hebrew word "Malak" is TRANSLATED as messenger about 50% of the time. The other times it is INTERPRETATED as angels. The words "angel" and "messenger" are very different words. Now what do you think about that? Does anyone here know the difference between a translation and a interpretation?
You are in error, Annihilationism is eternal. You are confusing two different issues. Is it that you do not know any better, or are you trying to confuse people because you are dishonest?Geo said:Annihilationism like Universalism is against the forum rules on many Christian forums, and the reasons are:
Annihilationism over the eternal punishment of the wicked is refuted biblically by examining the word 'aion' and 'aionos' which are the Greek words used throughout the N.T. to describe the eternal state of the wicked. Often proponents of the Annihilationism view will attempt to present the notion that 'aion' and 'aionos' do not really mean forever and ever, and do not mean eternal at all, but rather only a limited amount of time. Therefore the wicked aren't actually eternally in existence forever and ever, but only tormented and punished a limited finite amount of time.
However, this is a great flaw in the Annihilationism viewpoint. The reason is because if this premise were actually true; then the same level of consistency must also be applied when the terms 'aion' and 'aionos' are applied to the redeemed. In just as many places throughout scripture where we see the wicked eternally 'aion/aionos' suffering torment, we also see the redeemed eternally 'aion/aionos' reigning in Heaven with Christ. If 'aion/aionos' only means a finite, limited amount of time as Annhiliationism misinterprets, then for the redeemed Heaven will also be a limited stay; and nothing is eternal. The same scriptures that qualify God Himself as being eternal and forever and ever ('aion/aionos') must also be relegated to a limited time duration.
The word "heaven" was not introduced into scripture, nor does it have any symbolic use. It is a literal word meaning "place-s." There is a big difference in what Orthodox Jews and Judaic Christians believe, compared to those who are into Mysticism or Kabbalah. Any Jew who believe in angels or hell is into Mysticism. God also called the Earth heaven. Any good Christian or Jew is focused on the here and now.jasoncran said:you seem to like us hebrews as the reference , so then you dont accept hell but heaven? odd the jews say neither may be or both. they really dont know. they dont focus on the afterlife but in the here and now. after perhaps that verses about heaven could be a parable too.mdo757 said:OK then, ET or Messenger. Who decides? In the Old Testament the Hebrew word "Malak" is TRANSLATED as messenger about 50% of the time. The other times it is INTERPRETATED as angels. The words "angel" and "messenger" are very different words. Now what do you think about that? Does anyone here know the difference between a translation and a interpretation?
maybe theres no heaven and that the Lord is on the earth.
no i dont beleive that.
The Revelations are here now, and they are on going. But who is wise enough to see it?jasoncran said:so then why would the book of Revelation say some things about heaven and it (new Jerusalem) coming to the earth.
why are you even concerned with the end times? if what you say is true?
after all that's the future, we should Only be concerned with the here and now.