Am I to forgive one who doesn't ask for it?

[Relic]

That makes no sense. How could you think this would work. Hey! Wait a minute. What's happening?
......

But according to past reasonings from the very mind/brain of physicist/scientist/studier of followers of God/Quath..... God could have made the outcome differently. That way, God would not be mean and no one is to suffer for the nonexistance of Quath. So in concluding, with mathmatical assumptions, and as the ArnoldTerminator says..... Quath WILL BE BACK! :robot:.... with guinea pig cages in hand!
:wink: :-D


.

 

[christian_soldier]

:o

Surely a loving God would not visit a Quath upon the world?!?!

 

[christian_soldier]

Did you base that conclusion upon mathmatical assumptions? :-D


.

No, I took my shoes off and counted on my toes. You know what they say about assumptions...

 

[Relic]

.

If Quath doesn't exist or never has existed, how can we tell him that we now joke about his nonexistence?
:o

Does Orion exist? Is Orion actually a particle of nonexistent Quath ... incognito, but not really?
:o

Has Orion left the room?

Has he become relatively frayed due to what's happened to the theory in the strings of his OP thread?

Did my cat swallow too much string, that is, in theory?

Hey! wait a calculated minute!
According to my mathematical assumptions...
I don't own a cat!
:o


Do horses have legs?

:-D


.

 

[Atonement]

Wow this thread has really spun off on another topic LOL

 

[destiny]

Do sheep jump ropes?

 

[Atonement]

I've also wanted to know if you left a banana out long enough will it dance

 

[Relic]

Do sheep jump ropes?

: : : : :

.

 

[destiny]

I've also wanted to know if you left a banana out long enough will it dance

Ha!

 

[Relic]

I've also wanted to know if you left a banana out long enough will it dance

only if you count your toes to make mathmatical assumptions.


:-D

 

[Solo]

I've also wanted to know if you left a banana out long enough will it dance

Ha!

Get back!!!!

 

[christian_soldier]

Wow this thread has really spun off on another topic LOL

Not at all.

Thread is, after all, a type of string.

Or a string of type?

:smt024

 

[Vic C.]

I asked to talk about string theory.


:smt024 *note to self, be careful what you ask for, Vic*

 

[Relic]

I asked to talk about string theory.


:smt024 *note to self, be careful what you ask for, Vic*

What happens when you don't hold onto a string?

adrift


:P


.

 

[Orion]

*stepping on soapbox*

I would appreciate if people would stop think Quath and I are the same person. Quath is an atheist. I'm attempting to have questions answered because I want to be right before God. I want to know WHY. I want to have reasons, GOOD reasons, for why something happened, and why somethings were included in our Canon. I personally feel that not every word was inspired. That doesn't make me an athiest. It makes me a person who wants to know the reasons why, and when something doesn't make sense, I will point it out and look for answers. I'm not out to deny God and I must continue on the path I am on and trust that God will not allow me to be lead astray because I DO want to seek THE TRUTH.

So, I am not Quath. Quath is not me. I find some of what he says to be very thought provoking.

*stepping off soap box*

 

[Relic]

*stepping on soapbox*

I would appreciate if people would stop think Quath and I are the same person. Quath is an atheist. I'm attempting to have questions answered because I want to be right before God. I want to know WHY. I want to have reasons, GOOD reasons, for why something happened, and why somethings were included in our Canon. I personally feel that not every word was inspired. That doesn't make me an athiest. It makes me a person who wants to know the reasons why, and when something doesn't make sense, I will point it out and look for answers. I'm not out to deny God and I must continue on the path I am on and trust that God will not allow me to be lead astray because I DO want to seek THE TRUTH.

So, I am not Quath. Quath is not me. I find some of what he says to be very thought provoking.

*stepping off soap box*

okaaay, All kidding aside.


I found this web site which gives an explanation of the 6,000 day creation from what they say is truly a biblical perspective. I will go to the Thread you created on that subject and post a link. The web contains way too many pages to read in just one sitting. I am not finished perusing it yet, so I an not ready to make any comment as to what I agree with or not. Perhaps, if you like, you can read what they present and then give feedback on what you think about their analysis by posting it in your thread which is specifically on 6,000 day creation.


Here is the web site, http://www.kjvbible.org/theworlds.html Also, make sure you read the box (embedded frame) in the page, it describes the Chart on Biblical Timeline at the top of the page.
Inside the embedded frame is the title: "Guide to the Chart's 14 points".

Oh, and I recommend you start at the beginning....
If ya know what I mean. :wink:
Intro page( guide to the site) and Contents:http://www.kjvbible.org/



.


.