M
Michael Burke
Guest
Above is an example of an unbiased poll on the nature of Hell
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Judy said:So far I stand alone I voted "Hell is everlasting, unbelievers being justly punished for all eternity"
I believe the unbelievers are not given a second chance, nor are they annihilated. The punishment of the wicked dead is described throughout Scripture as "everlasting fire" (Matt 25:41); "unquenchable fire" (Matt 3:12); "shame and everlasting contempt" (Dan. 12:2); a place where "their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched" (Mark 9:44-49); a place of "torments" and "flame" (Luke 16:23,24) "everlasting destruction" (2Thes 1:9); a place of torment with "fire and brimstone" where "the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever" (Rev. 14:10,11); and a "lake of fire and brimstone" where the wicked are "tormented day and night forever and ever" (Rev. 20:10). Here Jesus indicates that the punishment itself is everlasting -- not merely the smoke and flames.
I thank you for casting your vote, and stating your opinion. I try to avoid the term "mis-translation," because I believe that the King James translators, the translators of the N.I.V., James Moffat, J.B. Phillips, and Dr. Robert Young all tried to convey the meaning of the Greek New Testament in English. I think the problem is that something is almost always lost in translation, and that all translation involves interpretation. If you look up all the verses you quoted in Young's Literal Translation, and concede that Young was an honest scholar of the Greek New Testament who tried to convey it's meaning in English (and who understood the language of the New Testament better then you or I), you must also concede the possibility of honest disagreement on this subject. I do believe the King James translators (and most of those who followed them) were influenced by theological baggage, but that's an opinion, so I also concede there is room for disagreement.Judy said:So far I stand alone I voted "Hell is everlasting, unbelievers being justly punished for all eternity"
I believe the unbelievers are not given a second chance, nor are they annihilated. The punishment of the wicked dead is described throughout Scripture as "everlasting fire" (Matt 25:41); "unquenchable fire" (Matt 3:12); "shame and everlasting contempt" (Dan. 12:2); a place where "their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched" (Mark 9:44-49); a place of "torments" and "flame" (Luke 16:23,24) "everlasting destruction" (2Thes 1:9); a place of torment with "fire and brimstone" where "the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever" (Rev. 14:10,11); and a "lake of fire and brimstone" where the wicked are "tormented day and night forever and ever" (Rev. 20:10). Here Jesus indicates that the punishment itself is everlasting -- not merely the smoke and flames.
I also thank you for casting your vote, and stating your opinion. God bless.guibox said:And all of these terms are used elsewhere in the bible metaphorically and to denote absolute and utter destruction and annihilation and to show results and continuity, not eternal duration. These terms must be understood in the metaphorical context, their linguistic meaning and cross referenced elsewhere. When you do, you will see that the language here is quite explainable and doesn't mean what you think it does.
smaller said:When you state "unbeliever" this has a twofold meaning. An "unbeliever" can be a "slave" of sin and made to be that way by the "god" of this present wicked and evil generation. Does that make the "slave" the unbeliever, or the Master. The Master is the clearly reveald "unbeliever" as that Master is "the cause" of unbelief. Same analogy goes for the "wicked servant." Who is that wicked servant but the cause?
So yes, there are "unbelievers" and "they" will be eternally punished and not redeemed.
The Lake is reserved for them and only them.
These, as "goats," as "tares," as "wicked servants," as "unbelievers," as "children of the devil," as "that man of woe," as "children of the flesh," shall be separated from the "sheep," the "children of God," the "wheat," the "captives," the "lame," the "blind" and these former shall go away to "everlasting" punishment for that is what they themselves are.
guibox said:smaller said:When you state "unbeliever" this has a twofold meaning. An "unbeliever" can be a "slave" of sin and made to be that way by the "god" of this present wicked and evil generation. Does that make the "slave" the unbeliever, or the Master. The Master is the clearly reveald "unbeliever" as that Master is "the cause" of unbelief. Same analogy goes for the "wicked servant." Who is that wicked servant but the cause?
So yes, there are "unbelievers" and "they" will be eternally punished and not redeemed.
The Lake is reserved for them and only them.
These, as "goats," as "tares," as "wicked servants," as "unbelievers," as "children of the devil," as "that man of woe," as "children of the flesh," shall be separated from the "sheep," the "children of God," the "wheat," the "captives," the "lame," the "blind" and these former shall go away to "everlasting" punishment for that is what they themselves are.
So what are you saying? The 'unbelievers' and 'wicked' are the demons and not sinners taken over by sin? TO believe this is to take only Revelation 20 and twist it around while ignoring the rest of scripture that show that the wicked's punishment is indeed that of Satan's.
"Depart from ye (all the wicked) who work iniquity into the fire prepared for Satan and his angels"
This fire is the fire that rains down from heaven, the lake of fire that is created where all "who are not written down in the book of life are cast" and where Satan himself is cast. You can't start separating 'sinners' into two categories. There are only two destinies, smaller.
You are saved or you perish in the lake of fire whether you'd interpret this 'perishing' or 'second death' as annihilation or eternal torment.
Perhaps you might want to explain.
smaller said:"Depart from ye (all the wicked) who work iniquity into the fire prepared for Satan and his angels"
It is only your presumptions that pin sins upon mankind. Paul tells us clearly that sins are not counted against mankind in 2 Corinthians 5:19 and telling us that Love keeps no record of wrongs in 1 Corinthians 13.
smaller said:The Lake of fire is a made or prepared "place" wherein the devils and his messengers are cast at the resurrection of "the dead."
Yes, and it is a place where all 'not found in the book of life' are cast. Please show me where this doesn't include the wicked. When we accept Christ our name is written there. Logically, those who do not will not have their names written there. Revelation 3:5 says that those who overcometh will not have their names blotted out of the book of life. Obviously the book of life accounts for all mankind.
smaller said:Your's is the larger problem as it makes God the killer of His Own Children and offspring whom all of mankind are.
I thank you for casting your vote, and stating your opinion, but I must say that I find huge holes in your position. The All Wise and Powerful God I worship sees the end from the beginning, and as He takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked, He would not have created beings He knew would sin if this meant they would suffer eternal torment.smaller said:I find your position with huge holes that I could not live with in honesty.
Michael Burke said:I thank you for casting your vote, and stating your opinion, but I must say that I find huge holes in your position.smaller said:I find your position with huge holes that I could not live with in honesty.
The All Wise and Powerful God I worship sees the end from the beginning, and as He takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked, He would not have created beings He knew would sin if this meant they would suffer eternal torment.
If you truly believe that God is All Wise, All Powerful' and foresees all (which is what I stated), why would you compare Him to the Wizard of Oz? I don't believe you intended it, but I believe this is a case of taking God's name in vain, and I respectfully suggest you repent immediately (as there is a Hell, humans can go there, and one hour would be an eternity.) You do not believe as I do, and I find your logic inconsistent.smaller said:Kinda like the Wizard of Oz eh? Perhaps you could deal with the fact that I probably believe just as you do with the exception of satan and demons who are "anti-life."
Michael Burke said:If you truly believe that God is All Wise, All Powerful' and foresees all (which is what I stated), why would you compare Him to the Wizard of Oz?smaller said:Kinda like the Wizard of Oz eh? Perhaps you could deal with the fact that I probably believe just as you do with the exception of satan and demons who are "anti-life."
I don't believe you intended it, but I believe this is a case of taking God's name in vain,
and I respectfully suggest you repent immediately
(as there is a Hell, humans can go there, and one hour would be an eternity.) You do not believe as I do, and I find your logic inconsistent.
smaller said:Michael Burke said:If you truly believe that God is All Wise, All Powerful' and foresees all (which is what I stated), why would you compare Him to the Wizard of Oz?smaller said:Kinda like the Wizard of Oz eh? Perhaps you could deal with the fact that I probably believe just as you do with the exception of satan and demons who are "anti-life."
I was just poking fun at your term, "the all wise and powerful." It is a quote from the Wizard of Oz movie. The all wise and powerful Oz.
I don't believe you intended it, but I believe this is a case of taking God's name in vain,
And I believe you have both a powerful imagination and no sense of humor to boot. Move on with your point.
[quote:c02a4]
and I respectfully suggest you repent immediately
(as there is a Hell, humans can go there, and one hour would be an eternity.) You do not believe as I do, and I find your logic inconsistent.