Mike
Member
I believe they are. We can use scripture that instructs who should be in church, why we should be in church, and how the early church gathered. I have a thread where this was a secondary point, but I'd like to focus a discussion on this.
It seems churches are becoming more common that open their doors to the community and specifically use their time of worship to spread the Message of Christ to every non-believer who will join them. I believe this is dangerous to their believers in that there is no "fellowship of believers", and more importantly, they are not being equipped to take the Gospel to their communities. Supporters of this church model might shame me for being un-welcoming and uncaring of the lost, but I believe this would be misguided. Christians who are not equipped to share the Gospel will be ill-equipped to help them.
Seeker churches will swing open their doors, crank up the volume, pass out food and coffee, and act as a marketing machine. They will avoid "third-rail topics", scripture and teachings, so they don't offend their seekers. I believe this waters down the message to the point that they are honoring man; not God. In Acts 2, we see that this wasn't the case. It was a time for believers to assemble, and they were strengthened by this time together.
In 2 Timothy 3, we're told that the Word is for correction, teaching, reproof and training to be equipped. We're supposed to get into the Word during this time so that we can then take the Message to the world. I believe seeker churches have this backwards, and in dumbing down the content to reach seekers, they are sacrificing the growth of their believers.
What do you think?
It seems churches are becoming more common that open their doors to the community and specifically use their time of worship to spread the Message of Christ to every non-believer who will join them. I believe this is dangerous to their believers in that there is no "fellowship of believers", and more importantly, they are not being equipped to take the Gospel to their communities. Supporters of this church model might shame me for being un-welcoming and uncaring of the lost, but I believe this would be misguided. Christians who are not equipped to share the Gospel will be ill-equipped to help them.
Seeker churches will swing open their doors, crank up the volume, pass out food and coffee, and act as a marketing machine. They will avoid "third-rail topics", scripture and teachings, so they don't offend their seekers. I believe this waters down the message to the point that they are honoring man; not God. In Acts 2, we see that this wasn't the case. It was a time for believers to assemble, and they were strengthened by this time together.
In 2 Timothy 3, we're told that the Word is for correction, teaching, reproof and training to be equipped. We're supposed to get into the Word during this time so that we can then take the Message to the world. I believe seeker churches have this backwards, and in dumbing down the content to reach seekers, they are sacrificing the growth of their believers.
What do you think?