Why do we listen to THEM and not to the ECF??
Amen!
How does that saying go?
“The truth is stranger than fiction”.
JLB
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Why do we listen to THEM and not to the ECF??
Abraham did as the LORD commanded him. So I would consider it a work.
It seems we ALL give bible lessons.
It seems we ALL give bible lessons.
I, for one, do not like the idea that we come here to teach. I know even some I agree with on everything use this terminology.
I like to say we come here to discuss.
So JLB believes he is 100% right and You believe You are 100% right. Problem is...both can't be right.
I'm sure you know that I agree with JLB. Here's why:
First of all any new Christian reading along will get incorrect ideas by reading what you, and those that agree with you, write. I know you don't mean this...but it sounds like after we come to salvation it's not necessary to obey or do works or do anything. It sounds like God will do it all for us.
When I encounter this type of disagreement, I like to go back to what those immediately after Jesus believed and taught others.
I find that nowhere in their writings is this idea that we have today of being "born again" in the way that we understand it.
They believed and taught that we must FOLLOW Jesus...to follow means to obey and to do the works HE spoke about.
I'm referring to the Early Church Fathers...or the very first theologians. So then I'm told they were not inspired. Well, are those of the 18th and 19th centuries inspired? Why do we listen to THEM and not to the ECF??
What makes you think the ECF held a superior theology? See, you don't have a standard.
It sounds like God will do it all for us.
When I encounter this type of disagreement, I like to go back to what those immediately after Jesus believed and taught others.
“... it was the Lord Himself who saved them, because they could not be saved by their own instrumentality; and, therefore, when Paul sets forth human infirmity, he says: "For I know that there dwelleth in my flesh no good thing," showing that the "good thing" of our salvation is not from us, but from God.
They were directly taught by Jesus, the truth.
By both the Truth and the Spirit that flowed from His heart directly into them.
Most of us misunderstand truth as being, just information.
Truth that comes to us apart from Christ and His Spirit is nothing more than divination, that comes from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Example:
- “These men are the servants of the Most High God, who proclaim to us the way of salvation.”
Now it happened, as we went to prayer, that a certain slave girl possessed with a spirit of divination met us, who brought her masters much profit by fortune-telling. This girl followed Paul and us, and cried out, saying, “These men are the servants of the Most High God, who proclaim to us the way of salvation.”
Acts 16:16-17
What this girl spoke was factually true.
JLB
Regarding Paul, I think we can trust him.
To be clear, the time between verse 18 and 19 here in Acts 26, was many (17?) years.
[People that are experts in historical settings may have more insight into the exact amount of years]
Today we have the Bible, so no one has an excuse.
Found it.
Hebrews 11:1
I think there is two different types of belief. To believe something and then to believe in it. Maybe belief is believing something in general, and faith is believing in it as truth.
It's like believing in the devil, if you believe the devil is real then you have belief, but you don't have faith and trust.
Maybe belief is one thing in two ways, and the "belieivng in" gives faith and trust. So you have Faith and belief.
Acturally, is faith not things hoped for not yet seen?, or something like that, I think I read something in scripture.
Mark, is a "work" a good thing or a bad thing for you?Abraham did as the LORD commanded him. So I would consider it a work.
Hey C, I haven't called your discussions silly, over and over. Just THIS one! And silly does't mean stupid..it means that it's not such an important discussion and maybe we shouldn't even be discussing it. You DO cling to the English and the Greek and I've always said that we shouldn't be so fussy about words, but try to see the N.T. in a bigger picture. I truly believe this is necessary.I haven’t insisted on the discussion. You can post/reply or not, it’s up to you. You can follow to ToS in doing so or not, it’s up to you. (How would you like for me to call your discussions “silly” over and over???).
You can look at the Biblical evidence I’ve presented or not it’s up to you. You can have faith/trust in what Paul literally wrote or you can simply believe your tradition that Paul wouldn’t thank God for their past tense slavery (confinement to disobedience), it’s up to you.
You’ve chosen to participate in a discussion in such a way as to call it “silly” (multiple times now) that Paul would thank God they were (past tense not present tense) slaves of sin, when the fact is that’s literally what he wrote:
But thanks be to God that you were slaves of sin, but ...Romans 6:17-18 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Romans 6:17-18&version=LEB
I have the faith to believe what Paul wrote is true and very much serious theology, not silly at all.
How is the fact that Paul wrote that “God confined them in disobedience” changing to discussion??? Isn’t that the part you don’t think Paul was thanking God for doing?
It seems to me confining someone to disobedience is simply another way expressing slavery to sin. Same thing really. But don’t reply if you’re through with the discussion. That is of course unless you feel it necessary to continue to call it “silly”. Might want to review ToS 1 and 1.1 first though.
Then just stop. Or at least stop calling it “silly”.
What a great post.Me too.
That’s where some of us disagree.
We see the word “work” associated with a discussion about faith and grace, and immediately we reject what is being presented as truth, because we already “know” in our mind that we are not saved by “works”, because we are saved by grace through faith faith.
When we define the principle of faith, and understand what grace is, we see how work is actually a vital ingredient in both grace and faith.
Not the works of the law.
Not the work that earns a wage.
Not good works.
The “work” of obedience.
“Work” in that sense = the effort obedience requires
That’s why it’s called the obedience of faith.
But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: Romans 16:26
Concerning being saved, (regenerated, born again) we are to obey the Gospel; obey the truth.
Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, 1 Peter 1:22
This is the clearest scripture in the Bible that describes the harmony of truth, between faith, our obedience, and grace.
Obeying the truth; obeying the Gospel, is how we are saved; born again.
The way we obey the Gospel is by confessing Jesus as Lord.
For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Romans 10:10
JLB
You never finish learning about grammar...it's ongoing, just like sanctification is!I’m still working on English grammar, among other things.
JLB
That's funny Mark.What makes you think the ECF held a superior theology? See, you don't have a standard.
OK C, but after we're saved...which is totally by God, as is stated by you, THEN we have our good works to do...“... it was the Lord Himself who saved them, because they could not be saved by their own instrumentality; and, therefore, when Paul sets forth human infirmity, he says: "For I know that there dwelleth in my flesh no good thing," showing that the "good thing" of our salvation is not from us, but from God.
Who is a murderer?Regarding Paul, I think we can trust him. Yet even in his life time Paul saw disagreement and quarrelling. But I was referring those who came after Paul. Constantine and his vision. Do you believe Constantine? I don't. Then there were the various Councils and disagreement. Then one side was victorious and they murdered those who disagreed with them.
Today we have the Bible, so no one has an excuse. Don't say you can't get the RSV and read it.
So if you want to follow murderers, go ahead. As for myself, I follow my Lord and Master Jesus Christ.