Pretty much the same subject.Your confusing this thread with the other. It's easy to do, I understand.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Pretty much the same subject.Your confusing this thread with the other. It's easy to do, I understand.
Pretty much the same subject.
We're not talking about the same subject? How does that work?Except we were not talking about it here.
it doesn'tWe're not talking about the same subject? How does that work?
Much has been claimed about the verb "believe" in the present tense. Such as; continuous action for the rest of one's life.
The following link provides a detailed explanation of Greek tenses.
http://www.ntgreek.org/learn_nt_greek/inter-tense.htm
If one can show from this link the suggestion that the present tense indicates action to the end of one's life, please copy and paste into a response to the OP.
The present tense is used to indicate an action occurring at the present time, from the perspective of the speaker/writer. Think of "currently", or "right now". The action can be continuous, but that doesn't mean action that continues on indefinitely.
We know that can't be true, since Jesus Himself used the present tense for 'believe' in Luke 8:13 - Those on the rocky ground are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root. They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away.
Note the 3 words that immediately follow the word 'believe': "for a while". If the present tense means continuous action to the end of one's life, then Jesus didn't understand grammar at all. Which I doubt very much.
Further, in the preceding verse, Jesus used the aorist tense of 'believe' to indicate salvation:
12 Those along the path are the ones who hear, and then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved.
So, it's clear that one is saved from a point in time belief, or a simple occurrence of belief.
In fact, Paul used the aorist tense frequently. In Acts 16:31 in his answer to the jailer's question of what he MUST DO to be saved, and in Rom 10:9.
So, the claim that the present tense means continuous action to the end of one's life is an incorrect use of the tense.
Eternal security is not a biblical teaching and meddling with Greek grammar will never make it biblical. The facts still remain, if one does not conditionally maintain a present tense "hearing" and "following" of Christ per John 10:27 then he will not be of the sheep in John 2:28 that shall not perish.
The idea a person can believe for a moment, then quit believing and yet still be saves is totally antagonistic to the bible's teachings:
Heb 3:12 "Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God." A less than present tense belief leaves one lost, separated from God. Hebrews 10:38 "Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him." Colossians 1:23 "If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;" (The verb 'continue is in the present tense - one must continue continuing)
Romans 5:2 "By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God."
Faith gives access to grace. If one can have faith for a moment then quit yet still be saved apart from faith, then why not argue one can be saved apart from grace also?
Acts 16:31 "And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house."
The jailer did not believe for a moment and then quit nor did he have belief only.
--the verb phrase "shalt be saved" in Acts 16:31 is future tense so he would not have salvation at that moment by just a momentary belief.
---There are constative aorist tense verbs...." views the action as a whole, taking no interest in the internal workings of the action. It describes the action as bare fact" http://www.bcbsr.com/greek/gtense.html....."describes an action in its entirety"
John 2:20 "Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?"
The verb "building" is a constative aorist. They did not build for a moment and quit but continued to build until action was complete.
---Acts 16:34 "And when he had brought them into his house, he set meat before them, and rejoiced, believing in God with all his house."
The verb "believing" is now in the perfect tense which describes an action in the past done that has a continuing effect.
---also the particle "believing" includes all the jailer had just done, his repentance and being baptized. So he was not saved 'belief only" for a moment. The idea one can be saved instantly, in a moment by believing only contradicts all the verses that require repentanace, confession and baptism for salvation.
Lastly, those of a Calvinistic persuasion erroneously think faith is a gift in the sense that one can only have faith if God gives it to him. If this were true, then why would God give one faith for a moment, then take it back? Why is not one gifted with faith for life? What reason would there be for the jailer to be given belief for a moment by God then have it taken away?
Hi,
These two verses make up one thought and cannot be separated. Verse 27 shows #1, the required faithfulness on part of the Christian to continue to hear and follow Christ. Verse 28 shows #2, God's faithfulness to the group Christian.
So in verse 28, the "they" that shall never perish is made up of those that maintain a faithful PRESENT TENSE, CONTINUOUS hearing and following of Christ. If the Christian becomes unfaithful in his hearing and following Christ per verse 27, then he will not be of the "they" in verse 28
This is why FreeGrace attacks the present tense (and will attack the subjunctive mood also).
Those of the Eternal Security thinking will ignore the verses that require faithfulness on part of the Christian. How more unfaithful could the jailer be if he believed for a moment, then quit?I have told him this same thing over and over, in which he ignores the whole verse and context, and only quotes a part of the verse.
JLB
That's right.Eternal security is not a biblical teaching and meddling with Greek grammar will never make it biblical.
Eternal security IS a biblical teaching. In fact, Jesus was very clear about it. He said those He gives eternal life will never perish in John 10:28.Eternal security is not a biblical teaching and meddling with Greek grammar will never make it biblical.
These are no facts. What Jesus said in v.28 contains NO CONDITIONS for never perishing.The facts still remain, if one does not conditionally maintain a present tense "hearing" and "following" of Christ per John 10:27 then he will not be of the sheep in John 2:28 that shall not perish.
Interesting to note that NONE of these verses just quoted says anything about losing salvation or eternal life. Or having to continuously believe in order to stay saved.The idea a person can believe for a moment, then quit believing and yet still be saves is totally antagonistic to the bible's teachings:
Heb 3:12 "Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God." A less than present tense belief leaves one lost, separated from God. Hebrews 10:38 "Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him." Colossians 1:23 "If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;" (The verb 'continue is in the present tense - one must continue continuing)
Romans 5:2 "By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God."
Faith gives access to grace. If one can have faith for a moment then quit yet still be saved apart from faith, then why not argue one can be saved apart from grace also?
Acts 16:31 "And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house."
The jailer did not believe for a moment and then quit nor did he have belief only.
--the verb phrase "shalt be saved" in Acts 16:31 is future tense so he would not have salvation at that moment by just a momentary belief.
---There are constative aorist tense verbs...." views the action as a whole, taking no interest in the internal workings of the action. It describes the action as bare fact" http://www.bcbsr.com/greek/gtense.html....."describes an action in its entirety"
John 2:20 "Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?"
The verb "building" is a constative aorist. They did not build for a moment and quit but continued to build until action was complete.
---Acts 16:34 "And when he had brought them into his house, he set meat before them, and rejoiced, believing in God with all his house."
The verb "believing" is now in the perfect tense which describes an action in the past that has a continuing effect. The jailer continued to believe unto the next day verse 35.
---also the participle "believing" includes all the jailer had just done, his repentance (washing stripes) and being baptized. So he was not saved 'belief only" for a moment. The idea one can be saved instantly, in a moment by believing only contradicts all the verses that require repentance, confession and baptism for salvation.
I agree with you regarding the Calvinistic persuasion. I'm not one of them any more than I'm of the Arminian persuasion. I'm of the biblical persuasion.Lastly, those of a Calvinistic persuasion erroneously think faith is a gift in the sense that one can only have faith if God gives it to him. If this were true, then why would God give one faith for a moment, then take it back? Why is not one gifted with faith for life? What reason would there be for the jailer to be given belief for a moment by God then have it taken away?
What a hoot!! I've never attacked the present tense. I HAVE shown the Arminian abuse of the present tense, though.This is why FreeGrace attacks the present tense (and will attack the subjunctive mood also).
Please explain WHY Jesus gave NO CONDITIONS for recipients of eternal life for never perishing.I do not know how popular the idea is among people that one can lose faith yet still be saved, but Charles Stanley is a promoter of it.
Why hasn't there EVER been any explanation of HOW "only quoting a part of the verse" changes ANYTHING I've claimed about the verse??I have told him this same thing over and over, in which he ignores the whole verse and context, and only quotes a part of the verse.
JLB
Nonsense. of course the believer is commanded to remain faithful. But not for salvation. For reward and blessings.Those of the Eternal Security thinking will ignore the verses that require faithfulness on part of the Christian.
It would be unfaithful, of course. But Jesus said those He gives eternal life will never perish. John 10:28How more unfaithful could the jailer be if he believed for a moment, then quit?
No, that's wrong.That's right.
Those of the Eternal Security thinking will ignore the verses that require faithfulness on part of the Christian. How more unfaithful could the jailer be if he believed for a moment, then quit?
We do not ignore those verses. We ignore the false interpretations of those verses.Those of the Eternal Security thinking will ignore the verses that require faithfulness on part of the Christian. How more unfaithful could the jailer be if he believed for a moment, then quit?
I am aware of your view.Seabass said: ↑
Eternal security is not a biblical teaching and meddling with Greek grammar will never make it biblical.
No, that's wrong.
Jesus said those He gives eternal life will never perish in John 10:28.
1) There is a "false interpretation" given to John 10:28 when verse 27 gets ignored as it is happening in this thread.We do not ignore those verses. We ignore the false interpretations of those verses.
Being unfaithful or going apostate after we are saved is a BIG deal. We lose our chance to Glorify Him in time and lose tremendous, tremendous rewards and blessings. Not to mention the heavy hand of discipline From our Father IF we don't continue in His faith.
To Grow in His grace knowledge requires faithfulness(STUDY<STUDY and STUDY His Mind.) If we don't, there are HUGE consequences.
But Salvation is simply believing and He seals us with His Spirit...........forever. Acts 16:31.