D
Dave Slayer
Guest
- Thread starter
- #41
Folks, I am not really here. I am just a parable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
John said:These wood/tree jokes are becoming a splinter in my side. :rolling
Adullam said:If Cain had married a tree he would have been called Cane!!!
John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
John said:If the Bible was a history book of the world, it would have a history of the Chinese included (not to mention everyone else)
It's a history book of the people who came from Adam, i.e., Seth, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Israel, the prophets, and finally Jesus and the apostles.
But the Bible says we all came from Adam and his descendants. "for in Adam all die" so these other people who did not descend from Adam would have missed the judgment or they had sinned and went against God also, but then that would contradict scripture.
researcher said:John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
Adullam said:If Cain had married a tree he would have been called Cane!!!
Dave Slayer said:researcher said:John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
Please, let's see the Biblical support for this.
not if they arent relevant to the point at hand.researcher said:If the Bible was a history book of the world, it would have a history of the Chinese included (not to mention everyone else)
Problem is that if it is a history book then it has the first literal man Adam created on the 6th literal creation day.It's a history book of the people who came from Adam, i.e., Seth, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Israel, the prophets, and finally Jesus and the apostles.
Then Adam could not have been a literal man since he was created very clearly on the 6th day of creation. This wouldnt leave much time at all for others to have evolved.researcher said:John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
That passage speaks only about resurrection of the dead and has no bearing in the discussion at hand.researcher said:And in Christ all live, but, we aren't his physical offspring.
OK. I believe it is 100% literal.follower of Christ said:researcher said:John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
Why is it so terribly hard to believe that Gods account of creation is the accurate one ?
That means Adam & Eve literally and physically died before midnight the day they ate the fruit
follower of Christ said:researcher said:John said:Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?
Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
Why is there no mention of anyone else being created ?
It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.John said:That means Adam & Eve literally and physically died before midnight the day they ate the fruit
That...or more likely the protection went away, they did die after all as we all will, but who is to say that in the beginning before sin there was no death ;)
It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.
John said:It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.
Last time i checked Adam did die, so it was literal. Just because death did not happen ASAP des not mean squat.
That is like you saying i am gonna die, you did not say when you just said i would die, would you be wrong if i died at 90 years old? No.