• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Cain's wife????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imagican
  • Start date Start date
Folks, I am not really here. I am just a parable.
 
These wood/tree jokes are becoming a splinter in my side. :rolling
 
If Cain had married a tree he would have been called Cane!!! :lol
 
John said:
These wood/tree jokes are becoming a splinter in my side. :rolling

Should we have the termites come remove those splinters? :D
 
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
 
John said:
If the Bible was a history book of the world, it would have a history of the Chinese included (not to mention everyone else)

It's a history book of the people who came from Adam, i.e., Seth, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Israel, the prophets, and finally Jesus and the apostles.

But the Bible says we all came from Adam and his descendants. "for in Adam all die" so these other people who did not descend from Adam would have missed the judgment or they had sinned and went against God also, but then that would contradict scripture.

And in Christ all live, but, we aren't his physical offspring.
 
researcher said:
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.

Please, let's see the Biblical support for this.
 
Adullam said:
If Cain had married a tree he would have been called Cane!!! :lol

I found this lost photo of Cane.

DaveCane.jpg
 
Dave Slayer said:
researcher said:
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.

Please, let's see the Biblical support for this.

I showed it to you. Apparently you find creating joke threads more fulfilling than reading for yourself.
 
researcher said:
If the Bible was a history book of the world, it would have a history of the Chinese included (not to mention everyone else)
not if they arent relevant to the point at hand.
I dont for a moment presume to tell God what His word HAS to include in order to believe the historical data included in it.
We dont know what all happened at Babel. Without more detail its simply hypothesis either way saying that the chinese were or werent also made to appear different.
I dont think Id go so far as claiming that some pre-adamite race existed just to make the numbers add up, though.

It's a history book of the people who came from Adam, i.e., Seth, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Israel, the prophets, and finally Jesus and the apostles.
Problem is that if it is a history book then it has the first literal man Adam created on the 6th literal creation day.
6 days....not much time for some pre-adamite race to have evolved.
 
researcher said:
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.
Then Adam could not have been a literal man since he was created very clearly on the 6th day of creation. This wouldnt leave much time at all for others to have evolved.
If the creation days cannot be trusted as being literal, then neither can the man Adam be taken as being literal....which means the genealogies are entirely false that lead back to him

Why is there no mention of anyone else being created ?
Why does scripture call Adam the 'first man' ?
Why is it so terribly hard to believe that Gods account of creation is the accurate one ?
 
researcher said:
And in Christ all live, but, we aren't his physical offspring.
That passage speaks only about resurrection of the dead and has no bearing in the discussion at hand.

We arent Christs physical offspring, but it is in line with scripture to believe that we ARE Adams offspring. As we are Noahs.
 
Dave you kill me :biglaugh

I wonder if one poster on this thread realises that Adam & Eve were not white, you know who you are.
 
follower of Christ said:
researcher said:
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.


Why is it so terribly hard to believe that Gods account of creation is the accurate one ?
OK. I believe it is 100% literal.

That means Adam & Eve literally and physically died before midnight the day they ate the fruit.
 
That means Adam & Eve literally and physically died before midnight the day they ate the fruit

That...or more likely the protection went away, they did die after all as we all will, but who is to say that in the beginning before sin there was no death ;)
 
follower of Christ said:
researcher said:
John said:
Lets just say that there was another creation event with people, they would have to have been made after Adam and Eve can we agree on that?

Could have been concurrent, or before. I would lean towards before.

Why is there no mention of anyone else being created ?

Jesus spoke in parables. Not even the disciples understood them until Jesus explained them to them.

Mar 8:15 And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod.
Mar 8:16 And they reasoned one with another, saying, We have no bread.
Mar 8:17 And Jesus perceiving it saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? do ye not yet perceive, neither understand? have ye your heart hardened?
Mar 8:18 Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember?
Mar 8:19 When I brake the five loaves among the five thousand, how many baskets full of broken pieces took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.
Mar 8:20 And when the seven among the four thousand, how many basketfuls of broken pieces took ye up? And they say unto him, Seven.
Mar 8:21 And he said unto them, Do ye not yet understand?

Mar 4:10 And when he was alone, they that were about him with the twelve asked of him the parables.
Mar 4:11 And he said unto them, Unto you is given the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all things are done in parables:

Mar 4:13 And he saith unto them, Know ye not this parable? and how shall ye know all the parables?

Mar 4:33 And with many such parables spake he the word unto them, as they were able to hear it;
Mar 4:34 and without a parable spake he not unto them: but privately to his own disciples he expounded all things.

The disciples understood the parables only after Jesus explained them to them.

And if God puts a parable out there, you will need Him to explain it to you.

Which is why there is the Holy Spirit.

Joh 16:13 ... he shall guide you into all the truth:

Man can't make you understand the parable of the beginning, but the HS can.
 
John said:
That means Adam & Eve literally and physically died before midnight the day they ate the fruit

That...or more likely the protection went away, they did die after all as we all will, but who is to say that in the beginning before sin there was no death ;)
It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.
 
It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.

Last time i checked Adam did die, so it was literal. Just because death did not happen ASAP des not mean squat.

That is like you saying i am gonna die, you did not say when you just said i would die, would you be wrong if i died at 90 years old? No.
 
John said:
It has to be 100% literal. Adam and Eve fell down, died, and their flesh began decomposing within hours of eating the fruit. Cain and Abel never existed because Adam and Eve died before they were born. Twenty-four hours after eating the fruit, humans ceased to exist on the earth.

Last time i checked Adam did die, so it was literal. Just because death did not happen ASAP des not mean squat.

That is like you saying i am gonna die, you did not say when you just said i would die, would you be wrong if i died at 90 years old? No.

Gen 2:17 for in the DAY that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

It's literal. They were decomposing dead bodies within hours of eating the fruit.
 
Back
Top