Bruce.Leiter
Member
- Oct 12, 2024
- 150
- 48
- Thread starter
- #61
Why, Tenchi? Or are you being ironic?Well, this'll annoy a certain censor-eager moderator...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Why, Tenchi? Or are you being ironic?Well, this'll annoy a certain censor-eager moderator...
I think that we would do a lot better in evaluating any group by studying and understanding their beliefs instead of observing their behaviors. After all, no one's perfect, far from it.You still do not know thier personal relationship with the Lord, if they really had one.
Did you have just knowledge and not a personal intimate relationship with the Lord?
I do not know Tenchi, you have claimed many times to be a Calvinist in the past, as many others have.
My experience with "ex" calvinists has shown me they really knew nothing about the doctrines of Grace.
Perhaps, it is obvious to you.
Some of your posts are confusing to me.
Grace and peace to you.
Yes, rightly understood, Calvinism is not at all fatalism. After being a Calvinist since 1962, I hope that I can shed a little light on that subject.If we're sharing in a Spirit of kindness, Elected, this would be my problem with the theology in a nutshell. I know you guys tend to reject the term "Fatalism," but that's what this comes off as to me. There are tremendous things I have had to fight through to continue serving the Lord Jesus Christ and living for Him. If I adopted a "what will be, will be" attitude because things were all pre-planned anyway, I would be missing God's will for my life. Several times Paul would make mention of Satan opposing his movements, and seeking to silence him, but he refused to back down against what looked like "the will of God." Christianity is in part a war, and you have to put your armor on and fight against what the enemy is doing whether you get nine miles of resistance to it or not. And if I subscribed to the whole "It's all preplanned anyway" mentality, I would not be making the sacrifices I am making. Not even close.
You can believe as you like and have your opinions.Do you know what the fallacious form of argument called "Moving the Goalposts" is? You do it here. Your initial assertion was that I was assuming what I was saying about Calvinists. I have explained that this isn't so. Instead of acknowledging that you were wrong about my merely assuming what I was saying about Calvinists, however, you now resort to arguing that I can't know their "personal relationship with the Lord." Your doing this deflects from your false assertion and avoids having to admit that it was in error. This is both fallacious and slippery arguing that ought to be beneath a Christian because it is.
Yup. And it was very destructive spiritually that this was so.
Well, this is a convenient statement that many Calvinists, in my experience, like to make. It's actually a form of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. You seem very unaware of how often you employ fallacies in your posts. Anyway, it's a kind of ad hoc "purity statement" that relieves you of having to back down from your earlier mistaken remarks. Instead of doing so, you just insinuate that I wasn't a "real" Calvinist because your experience with other former Calvinists suggests that I likely don't know what the "doctrines of grace" (aka TULIP) are. This, too, is both fallacious and slippery reasoning and so ought not to have any place in Christian discourse.
Hi! I have observed abuses of the spectacular gifts, particularly the gift of tongues, that did not conform to biblical guidelines. For example, my mom and I were at a Bible camp with several charismatics. We were praying in a circle when a middle-aged gentleman burst out in a language that I didn't understand. The problem was that no one interpreted it for us, as Paul requires. Another one was a Pentecostal evening service we attended during which the sermon was drowned out by most of the attendees loudly speaking in unknown languages. I don't think that God wanted those uses of his gifts to prevent us from hearing the preacher.Good morning, Elected.
But you acknowledge that He Himself considered His written word was not enough during New Testament times, yes? He said they were sent to confirm His word. The usual response is that we no longer need signs and wonders because it has already been confirmed, but evangelism still goes on today, so it is not just about those who already believe, it is also about those who have yet to believe, because scripture says the harvest is coming at the end of the age which is still ahead of us.
Speaking for Pentecostals, we're not doing it because we need signs and wonders to believe, we're doing it because we believe it is important to ministry, like I was pointing out in this thread last week (see last section on Page 2).
Speaking As The Oracles Of God, The Responsibility Of Every Believer
Were the works of the Old Testament prophets just painting a picture from the past that we are no longer supposed to walk in, or should the great prophetic gifts of old still be in operation today? And is prophecy exclusively the domain of those who walk in the office of prophet, or was it a gift the entire church was called to walk in? Joel 2:28 suggests that the entire end-time church will continue to operate in them, and that from youngest to oldest they will all move in dreams, visions and...
- Hidden In Him
- Replies: 30
- Forum: Pentecostalism
Good morning, Elected.
But you acknowledge that He Himself considered His written word was not enough during New Testament times, yes? He said they were sent to confirm His word. The usual response is that we no longer need signs and wonders because it has already been confirmed, but evangelism still goes on today, so it is not just about those who already believe, it is also about those who have yet to believe, because scripture says the harvest is coming at the end of the age which is still ahead of us.
Speaking for Pentecostals, we're not doing it because we need signs and wonders to believe, we're doing it because we believe it is important to ministry, like I was pointing out in this thread last week (see last section on Page 2).
Speaking As The Oracles Of God, The Responsibility Of Every Believer
Were the works of the Old Testament prophets just painting a picture from the past that we are no longer supposed to walk in, or should the great prophetic gifts of old still be in operation today? And is prophecy exclusively the domain of those who walk in the office of prophet, or was it a gift the entire church was called to walk in? Joel 2:28 suggests that the entire end-time church will continue to operate in them, and that from youngest to oldest they will all move in dreams, visions and...
- Hidden In Him
- Replies: 30
- Forum: Pentecostalism
Yes, but is evangelism today a sign gift?But you acknowledge that He Himself considered His written word was not enough during New Testament times, yes? He said they were sent to confirm His word. The usual response is that we no longer need signs and wonders because it has already been confirmed, but evangelism still goes on today, so it is not just about those who already believe, it is also about those who have yet to believe, because scripture says the harvest is coming at the end of the age which is still ahead of us.
I did read that article, when you posted it.Good morning, Elected.
But you acknowledge that He Himself considered His written word was not enough during New Testament times, yes? He said they were sent to confirm His word. The usual response is that we no longer need signs and wonders because it has already been confirmed, but evangelism still goes on today, so it is not just about those who already believe, it is also about those who have yet to believe, because scripture says the harvest is coming at the end of the age which is still ahead of us.
Speaking for Pentecostals, we're not doing it because we need signs and wonders to believe, we're doing it because we believe it is important to ministry, like I was pointing out in this thread last week (see last section on Page 2).
Speaking As The Oracles Of God, The Responsibility Of Every Believer
Were the works of the Old Testament prophets just painting a picture from the past that we are no longer supposed to walk in, or should the great prophetic gifts of old still be in operation today? And is prophecy exclusively the domain of those who walk in the office of prophet, or was it a gift the entire church was called to walk in? Joel 2:28 suggests that the entire end-time church will continue to operate in them, and that from youngest to oldest they will all move in dreams, visions and...
- Hidden In Him
- Replies: 30
- Forum: Pentecostalism
Your suggestions of certain fallacies, backing down or moving the goal post is not the intention from my heart.
I understand what you are saying and not concerned about if your intentions are to belittle me.I never spoke to the intention of your heart, only to the manner of your reasoning.
It is dangerous to be a poor thinker, but not immoral. And many who aren't aware of their fallacies of reasoning aren't so because they are wanting to be fallacious. Mostly, they've just never been taught how to reason well.
So, understand, please, that I'm not denigrating you as a person when pointing out poor reasoning, only the way in which you come to your conclusions and beliefs about things.
I may have poor reasoning in your eyes and that is fine, but I have been told the opposite from others
Fair enough.It's not just "in my eyes," as though good or bad reasoning is a matter of personal opinion. There are, as I already explained to you, very well-established, objectively-existing forms of bad - and good - reasoning to which we all are subject. We ignore those forms at our own peril.
Every person who wants to be a logically-careful, well-reasoned person, has to learn the same set of laws, rules and principles of good thinking. Myself included. At one time, I was a very poor thinker. This didn't make me a bad person, or less precious to God, but it did lead me to very bad conclusions about things - sometimes extremely important ones.
There is no moving the goal posts fallacy in any of electedbyHim post. I see in the responses an intentional or unintentional deflecting from understanding what is said. But if we take the "what I was saying about Calvinist" in the context of what you did say about them, you have presented a false equivalency fallacy. "This is my experience with the Calvinists I know, therefore all Calvinist and Calvinism are just as they were." Not to mention, it was observational and therefore based solely on your perceptions.Do you know what the fallacious form of argument called "Moving the Goalposts" is? You do it here. Your initial assertion was that I was assuming what I was saying about Calvinists.
At one time, I was a very poor thinker. This didn't make me a bad person, or less precious to God, but it did lead me to very bad conclusions about things - sometimes extremely important ones.
I agree, so it is important to heed the warnings about the fruit of the prophet-interpreter. (Matt 7:15-20)However, if those "gifts" come from another source, they will not follow Scriptural teachings. Satan can do such miracles too.
Can you rephrase "in principle" for me ?True! But that crucifixion in principle when we first believed has to work itself out in practice the rest of our lives. That why Paul gave many commands to his churches and to us in the last parts of his letters after presenting Jesus' work in principle through his death and resurrection in his letters' first parts.
It still is.The gift of prophecy given to the prophets was really the gift of preaching for the good of the people, not primarily a foretelling of future events.
Yup.Read the prophets' books again. In parts of those messages, God gives occasional glimpses of the future for the good of his people.
For me, water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sins not only provides for the atonement of my past sins, but also my entry into Christ; and into His death, burial, and resurrection; whereby my old man was killed with Him, buried with Him, and raised with Him to walk in newness of life.Hopeful, for me, water baptism is just a God's sign of his faithful gift of the new birth and new life that he gives to believers,
Baby baptism is a waste of time, as babies have nothing to repent of, so no sins to remit.when they trust in Jesus, whether it happens in infancy or in adulthood. I have been baptized with water three times: when I was a Methodist baby, when I was immersed as part of the 12-year-old "herd" into church membership, and when I was 80 as a celebration of more than 6 decades of faith in Jesus.
Isn't remittance of sin important for salvation ?None of them saved me, but all of them testified to God's great, gracious love to me.
I think the biggest problem with dreams and visions is the possibility of reading into dreams something that isn't there. And that is the main issue with (supposed) revelations from God--they are highly subjective and may not be from God at all.
They might even think their visions, dreams, etc., are actually from God, but a lack of discernment keeps them from seeing the truth.
This is worth the watch:
The other "prophet" was showing all the prophecies he's made in last few years, including ones that have (seemingly) come true
All that to point out that a serious lack of discernment in some Christian circles leads to many being led astray by supposed direct revelations from God, rather than sticking to the revelation already given in the Bible.