Doulos Iesou
Member
- Mar 22, 2013
- 3,498
- 32
Introduction:
I am not 100% convinced on this topic, and indeed find it a hard issue to deal with. The topic is Christian Pacifism and the issue of just how radical is Jesus' call to peace and non-violence.
I don't expect to convince anyone, maybe myself perhaps, but rather to promote discussion so that I can come to a better understanding of the issue and perhaps glean wisdom from what others have to say.
Jesus and the Apostles:
Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword. Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels? Matthew 26:52-53(ESV)
This statement is quite strong from Jesus, during his arrest Peter takes up the sword and strikes one of the soldiers so as to take off an ear. Jesus, rebukes his action and warns him that all who take the sword will perish (die) by the sword. He then appeals to the fact that Jesus could call down an Angel army to rescue him, but he is being given into the hands of their enemies so that the Scriptures might be fulfilled.
The questions then arise in my mind:
1. Does this apply to only private citizens and not the government, as the civil government does not bear the sword in vain and are God's ministers to bring about justice (Romans 13).
2. Does this apply to Christians participating in a war?
3. Does this apply to self-defense, and are there instances where violence to protect a family or loved ones is justified for the Christian?
These questions will be applicable for every passage.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you Matthew 5:43-44(ESV)
If we are to obey Jesus' commandment here, how can a Christian be involved with any kind of violence without violating this command?
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. Matthew 5:38-39(ESV)
This passage seems to prohibit retaliation, even to the degree where you don't flee from violence, but offer up the cheek to patiently endure further injury. This concept is explained with the next verse I will offer.
Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.†To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.†Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:17-21
As Christians, we are commanded to repay no one evil for evil, this is again as well as in v.19 a call to not retaliate for the Christian. Paul then builds a positive case for what is to be done instead of violence.
We are to "give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all." This requires us to think this out, instead of repaying evil, we are instead to consider what would be the most honorable decision in that instance. Some examples are given later in v.20. If our enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him drink. While our enemies would want to destroy our bodies, we ought to be ready to care for the most basic needs of their bodies, to be compassionate and help them.
Effectively overcoming evil with good, just as our Lord did.
When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly. 1 Peter 2:23(ESV)
Conclusion:
There are certainly more texts to explore, but I wanted to stop here so it's not too much content to deal with.
I think from what I have read so far in these passages there are difficult questions to ask, but certainly a radical to peaceful living when following Jesus. If we are to truly follow his example, and be his followers and disciples, how can we justify acting violently in any scenario when he himself never did so?
Thoughts?
I am not 100% convinced on this topic, and indeed find it a hard issue to deal with. The topic is Christian Pacifism and the issue of just how radical is Jesus' call to peace and non-violence.
I don't expect to convince anyone, maybe myself perhaps, but rather to promote discussion so that I can come to a better understanding of the issue and perhaps glean wisdom from what others have to say.
Jesus and the Apostles:
Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword. Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels? Matthew 26:52-53(ESV)
This statement is quite strong from Jesus, during his arrest Peter takes up the sword and strikes one of the soldiers so as to take off an ear. Jesus, rebukes his action and warns him that all who take the sword will perish (die) by the sword. He then appeals to the fact that Jesus could call down an Angel army to rescue him, but he is being given into the hands of their enemies so that the Scriptures might be fulfilled.
The questions then arise in my mind:
1. Does this apply to only private citizens and not the government, as the civil government does not bear the sword in vain and are God's ministers to bring about justice (Romans 13).
2. Does this apply to Christians participating in a war?
3. Does this apply to self-defense, and are there instances where violence to protect a family or loved ones is justified for the Christian?
These questions will be applicable for every passage.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you Matthew 5:43-44(ESV)
If we are to obey Jesus' commandment here, how can a Christian be involved with any kind of violence without violating this command?
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. Matthew 5:38-39(ESV)
This passage seems to prohibit retaliation, even to the degree where you don't flee from violence, but offer up the cheek to patiently endure further injury. This concept is explained with the next verse I will offer.
Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.†To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.†Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:17-21
As Christians, we are commanded to repay no one evil for evil, this is again as well as in v.19 a call to not retaliate for the Christian. Paul then builds a positive case for what is to be done instead of violence.
We are to "give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all." This requires us to think this out, instead of repaying evil, we are instead to consider what would be the most honorable decision in that instance. Some examples are given later in v.20. If our enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him drink. While our enemies would want to destroy our bodies, we ought to be ready to care for the most basic needs of their bodies, to be compassionate and help them.
Effectively overcoming evil with good, just as our Lord did.
When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly. 1 Peter 2:23(ESV)
Conclusion:
There are certainly more texts to explore, but I wanted to stop here so it's not too much content to deal with.
I think from what I have read so far in these passages there are difficult questions to ask, but certainly a radical to peaceful living when following Jesus. If we are to truly follow his example, and be his followers and disciples, how can we justify acting violently in any scenario when he himself never did so?
Thoughts?