DarkWalker
Member
I grew up on Steven Curtis Chapman, Oldies, and the Baptist Hymnal. It wasn't until I reached my teens that I found bands like DC Talk or Jars of Clay, and it wasn't until my twenties that I discovered bands like Skillet. I discovered bands like Theocracy in my late twenties.
My introduction to what I call Cruddy Christian Music (CCM, and yes, I know what it's supposed to stand for) was with Sonicflood and that horrendous song, "In the Secret" or "I Want to Know You (More)." I am not a fan of songs that repeat themselves ad nauseum, regardless of the genre, but when it's in Christian music, I find that to be a waste of time and talent.
Unfortunately, some of the biggest names in Christian music are guilty of bad theology, wasted lyrics, poor musical talent, and other errors. You will find all of these things in secular music as well (Seether is one such example, as is Metallica). What bothers me about people like Chris Tomlin, the Paul Coleman Trio, and others is they are more than just artists. They are supposed to be representative of a faith.
Think of it this way: James Hetfield of Metallica gets on stage, yells, "God wants you to demand what you want of Him, because He wants to give it to you!" People will laugh, people will scoff ('cause it's a secular band), but people will also listen to what he has to say. I guarantee that if Hetfield says he eats Lucky Charms, sales will go up for Lucky Charms.
The same would happen if Michael Tait of the Newsboys said something. Back when Peter Furler was the frontman for the Newsboys, I had to stop listening to them. They got into some horrid, horrid theology that made God into a cosmic bellboy from whom we could demand what we wanted, and because He loves us, He has to comply.
However, all of this pales in comparison to the king of overhyped talent and bad theology. The one, the original, and dear God could he please be the only...Chris Tomlin.
You do not get to steal a song written by John Newton, slap your own verse in it, and call it your song that you can profit from ("Amazing Grace"). You should not get to write songs using the same dead-as-a-dead-horse-hackneyed metaphors and analogies. You should not be able to rip off album concepts that a billion people have ripped off before you and get to hold onto your self-respect. What's sick and wrong to me is Tomlin and others like him are filling up stadiums based on bad theology, tired lyrics, (barely) catchy tunes, and emotional hype.
As I said, yes, you will find this all in secular music, but the difference is that people will look to Tomlin's songs for spiritual guidance. It's like picking up a toothpick to defend yourself and deluding yourself into thinking it's a lance.
My introduction to what I call Cruddy Christian Music (CCM, and yes, I know what it's supposed to stand for) was with Sonicflood and that horrendous song, "In the Secret" or "I Want to Know You (More)." I am not a fan of songs that repeat themselves ad nauseum, regardless of the genre, but when it's in Christian music, I find that to be a waste of time and talent.
Unfortunately, some of the biggest names in Christian music are guilty of bad theology, wasted lyrics, poor musical talent, and other errors. You will find all of these things in secular music as well (Seether is one such example, as is Metallica). What bothers me about people like Chris Tomlin, the Paul Coleman Trio, and others is they are more than just artists. They are supposed to be representative of a faith.
Think of it this way: James Hetfield of Metallica gets on stage, yells, "God wants you to demand what you want of Him, because He wants to give it to you!" People will laugh, people will scoff ('cause it's a secular band), but people will also listen to what he has to say. I guarantee that if Hetfield says he eats Lucky Charms, sales will go up for Lucky Charms.
The same would happen if Michael Tait of the Newsboys said something. Back when Peter Furler was the frontman for the Newsboys, I had to stop listening to them. They got into some horrid, horrid theology that made God into a cosmic bellboy from whom we could demand what we wanted, and because He loves us, He has to comply.
However, all of this pales in comparison to the king of overhyped talent and bad theology. The one, the original, and dear God could he please be the only...Chris Tomlin.
You do not get to steal a song written by John Newton, slap your own verse in it, and call it your song that you can profit from ("Amazing Grace"). You should not get to write songs using the same dead-as-a-dead-horse-hackneyed metaphors and analogies. You should not be able to rip off album concepts that a billion people have ripped off before you and get to hold onto your self-respect. What's sick and wrong to me is Tomlin and others like him are filling up stadiums based on bad theology, tired lyrics, (barely) catchy tunes, and emotional hype.
As I said, yes, you will find this all in secular music, but the difference is that people will look to Tomlin's songs for spiritual guidance. It's like picking up a toothpick to defend yourself and deluding yourself into thinking it's a lance.
(Excerpt from Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes)
Just then they came in sight of thirty or forty windmills that rise from that plain. And no sooner did Don Quixote see them that he said to his squire, "Fortune is guiding our affairs better than we ourselves could have wished. Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them. With their spoils we shall begin to be rich for this is a righteous war and the removal of so foul a brood from off the face of the earth is a service God will bless."
"What giants?" asked Sancho Panza.
"Those you see over there," replied his master, "with their long arms. Some of them have arms well nigh two leagues in length."
"Take care, sir," cried Sancho. "Those over there are not giants but windmills. Those things that seem to be their arms are sails which, when they are whirled around by the wind, turn the millstone."