Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Did The United States Really Land On The Moon?

Scientific data from the computers on the flying saucer kept at Roswell Air Force Base, confirm that we did actually land on the moon. This is surprising, because the flying saucer crashed before we even had a space program.
 
Flying to the moon, mars and what not in the search for life is a waste of money just like the large hadron collider is a waste of money. The science behind launching satellites is good and beneficial, looking for life is not.
 
Sure was a lot of activity around that buggy. Wonder how long it had been parked there?

as17-140-21354-small.jpg


Not all the tire tracks were destroyed though.

as17-140-21354-detail-small.jpg
 
I knew it!!

Rick is one of THEM!!! He'll probably delete my post calling him out. :grumpy

Reveal your true identity!! Which are you? Elvis or JFK?? :grumpy
















:biglol
 
Vince said:
There aren't any footprints around the moon buggy because the wind blew them away.

The place looks like a stampede of alien moon cattle went through there. :lol
 
One thing we do know, is that the US Gov. does not tell us everything. There are many secrets that they still will not release to the public.

Maybe the reason there are no tire tracks, is because the land rover was made by Toyota. Or the land rover ran out of fuel. Or a faulty spark plug. Or a flat tire on the side of the rover we can't see. And the US Gov. didn't have triple - A for road side service.

Maybe the driver of the rover failed his driving test, and him sitting there was for an impression only purpose. Or, maybe the driver was looking for direction signs and couldn't find any, so he just sat there wondering where route 66 was.

Or, maybe there was an outdoor movie theater on the moon, and he was more interested in the movie than being on the moon for exploritory reasons.

Maybe there were hitch hikers on the moon, and the driver was wondering where he would put all these people, since the rover didn't have enough seating for all those hitch hikers.

Maybe NASA brought back the man in the moon. Which would explain why there is no more man in the moon anymore.

Maybe NASA should be more honest with us all, and not tell us lies about how much it really cost to go to the moon, and once there, they didn't find anything worth any value. And at what cost to the tax payers ?

Our Gov. is suppose to be "for the people" , and not for their foolish endeavors.
 
There had to have been instruments of interest on that rover. Heck, the rover itself was a focus of interest. Scientists on earth would want to know every little thing about it after it's cruise on the moon... especially the design engineers. In any case the rover would be the center of attraction for a LOT of activity.

The reason we went to the moon was so we could say we were the first ones there. I'm not sure people back then cared much about the cost but rather a reason to have pride in their country... something that seems to have gotten lost over time.
 
Plenty more where those came from:

15scottirwinflagcams.jpg



15alienbootprint.jpg



17samecmrev.jpg



did they get out in lunar orbit and stick tape on it or something??...

Pro 20:17: Bread of deceit is sweet to a man; but afterwards his mouth shall be filled with gravel.
 
I'm really disappointed in you people. I said that there were no footprints because the wind blew them away. Not one person objected. And I had a good joke set up and everything.
 
Vince said:
I'm really disappointed in you people. I said that there were no footprints because the wind blew them away. Not one person objected. And I had a good joke set up and everything.

Ok, ok...I'll object for the sake of a joke. Let's hear it then :shades
 
Back
Top