Do you really not see the problem in this statement. Clearly, NT Wright would say "God gave us the Holy Spirit, noyt felix to teach us".
Anyone can claim that their interpretation of the Bible is guided by the Spirit.
Yes, I agree.
My claim, which I believe is consistent with Paul's argument in Romans is, again, this: God did not punish Jesus on the cross, He punished sin on the cross.
Let me quote from NT Wright:
God, says Paul, condemned sin. Paul does not, unlike some, say that God condemned Jesus. True, God condemned sin in the flesh of Jesus; but this is some way from saying, as many have, that God desired to punish someone and decided to punish Jesus on everyone's behalf. Paul's statement is more subtle than that. It is not merely about a judicial exchange, the justice of which might then be questioned (and indeed has been questioned). It is about sentence of death being passed on "sin" itself, sin as a force or power capable of deceiving human beings, taking up residence within them, and so causing their death (7:7-25) ... For Paul, what was at stake was not simply God's judicial honor, in some Anselmic sense, but the mysterious power called sin, at large and destructive within God's world, needing to be brough to book, to have sentence passed and executed upon it, so that, with its power broken, God could then give the life sin would otherwise prevent
Now: You may not agree with this, but it is a clear statement of an interpretation of the nature of the atonement. And I believe it is probably the correct interpretation, even though it does not (yet) have mainstream acceptance.