Good morning, Mike. Now that you have had the weekend to post your detailed understanding, let's look at some points where we may disagree and agree. First, the definitions...
Solo said:
First, let us ask the question, What is "Eternal Security"?
Eternal Security is the term used to describe the state of an individual who has been "saved"?
That is a definition based upon
begging the question. You have yet to prove that being saved is "eternal security", nor is that universally accepted. When beginning such a 'dissertation', you don't begin by begging the question that you intend to prove. That is the entire point of this thread - to show that being saved IS eternally secured. I will get to my reasonings on my disagreement later as I address your very well laid out points.
I would like to point this out for others, because people can be subliminally effected by such misleading "definitions".
Solo said:
Which leads to the question, "saved" from what?
An individual is "saved" from condemnation or judgment.
Again, you are begging the question and ignoring Scriptures that say that even "saved" people are judged and some are even condemned. Your presumptions of John 3 are this:
Those initially saved are not condemned - based upon Christ's words that those who are NOT initially saved are condemned. This is false logic that jumps to conclusions
Here is Christ's point:
Those who do not accept Christ's Gospel are condemned.
This does NOT mean that those who DO accept Christ's Gospel AVOID condemnation, because no statement is made about such a person who subsequently REJECTS the Gospel.
The only statement made is that
rejecting the Gospel condemns.
Accepting the Gospel saves.
But nothing is said about a person who falls away AFTER receiving the Gospel and accepting it.
Jesus VERY CLEARLY says that people DO fall away - and are subsequently condemned. Where? Try first the parable of the Sower and the Seed. The seed is the Word, the Gospel. Note how some receive the Gospel and have faith and are joyous to begin with but LATER, because of the worries of the world, fall away and LOSE faith. They fall away.
Thus, your interpretation of John 3 does not take into account all of what Christ said, because it presumes or begs the question. You presume that those who accept the Gospel cannot later reject it, when Christ doesn't say that.
Ever.
Solo said:
How is one "condemned"?
An individual is condemned when they are born into physical existence at the point one becomes a living human.
Again, where do we have this in Scriptures? Christ says that REJECTING the Gospel brings about condemnation, not being born!!! This is an incredible misunderstanding of Who God is...
I am not sure if this comes from misinterpretating John 3:5 or whether this is a result of Luther's low opinion of man that has filtered into your paradigm. However, John 3 doesn't say ANYTHING about being physically born = being condemned!
Basically, that says that God creates men for the express purpose of condemning them, the age-old error of Calvin...
Truly, it is a terrible idea of Who God is and His LOVE for mankind.
Solo said:
Let us look at what Jesus Christ reveals about salvation, and one is to see and enter the kingdom of God. We will turn to the Gospel according to John, chapter 3.
Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews came to Jesus and states that he knows Jesus to be a teacher from God because of the works that Jesus does. Nicodemus states that no man could do the miracles that Jesus does except that God be with Him. Jesus then reveals to Nicodemus that an individual cannot even see the kingdom of God unless he is born again.
What is being born again mean? The Greek words γεννηθη (gennÄ“thÄ“) and ἄνÉθεν (anÃ…Âthen) are translated into the English King James Version as "born again."
The alternative and correct interpretation is "born from above". Nicodemus expresses the confusion - since the words can mean "born again" or "born from above". He thinks Christ means "born again" by describing his disbelief in crawling back into the womb. (John 3:4) Jesus corrects Nicodemus by DIFFERENTIATING between things of the flesh and things of the spirit. He is speaking about something Nicodemus SHOULD KNOW!
Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things? John 3:10
Oh, yes, these are not unknown secrets to the Jews. This is not some incredible new teaching. The Jews KNEW that one could not walk in the ways of the Lord UNLESS God guided them, unless they walked a walk of faith. They knew this - and is the idea is clearly present in the many Psalms, such as Psalm 119:
My soul cleaveth unto the dust: quicken thou me according to thy word. I have declared my ways, and thou heardest me: teach me thy statutes. Make me to understand the way of thy precepts: so shall I talk of thy wondrous works. My soul melteth for heaviness: strengthen thou me according unto thy word. Remove from me the way of lying: and grant me thy law graciously. I have chosen the way of truth: thy judgments have I laid [before me]. I have stuck unto thy testimonies: O LORD, put me not to shame. I will run the way of thy commandments, when thou shalt enlarge my heart. Ps 119:25-32
I could go on, but you get the picture. I underlined the last verse here just to show that the Jews did understand and were taught that one can follow God's Laws only by guidance from God Himself. One must be born of God's Spirit and actively seek God in faith - and HE will enable us to do all of that.
Solo said:
But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, why do you turn back again to the weak and miserable elemental principles, to which you desire to be in bondage all over again? James 1:17
Uh, yea, that doesn't help your position, does it. :halo
It points out what you have inadvertently overlooked in John 3 - by saying that ALL who initially accept the Word DO NOT fall away and become condemned...
Solo said:
Therefore, the revelation that Jesus Christ gives us in John 3 is that in order to see and enter the kingdom of God, one must be born, beget, or conceived from above, again, from the beginning, from the top.
Agreed - and thus, I will not address "part 2 of 7", since we - and I believe most Christians - say that one cannot follow the ways of the Lord UNLESS we are given aide from above.
Solo said:
Nicodemus is confused, and asks Jesus how one is to be born again, and Jesus replies to him that one must be born of water, the physical birth; and born of the Spirit, the spiritual birth.
No. I will simply say that such an interpretation is on the silly side, if you think about it.
WHO says any of the following???
"Unless you are physically born and exercise, you cannot become stronger".
"Unless you are physically born and turn in your homework, you cannot pass this class".
"Unless you are physically born and start the lawnmower, the yard will not get done".
"Unless you are physically born and turn in that report by tommorrow, we will lose the Smith account"...
What an amazingly redundant and "no freakin kiddin'" thing to say! "Unless you are physically born..." Who would say such a thing? Clearly, Jesus is refering to ONE operation. Being born of water and the Spirit at the same time. Not being born physically, and then being born spiritually...
Think about it. WHO talks that way? EVERYONE IN EXISTENCE was/is born physically. There is no need to make that distinction, nor was there a need for Jesus to talk about "unless you have two arms" or "unless you are breathing"...
And finally, WHERE does "being born of water"= "physical birth" in the Bible? Why would Nicodemus, upon hearing "being born of water" think "physical birth"?
The confusion of thinking of physical birth is over "born again" vs. "born from above". You can read about it in your own posts of the Greek.
Jesus clearly meant "born from above". Not "born again".
Solo said:
Those who die in the flesh after having been born of the flesh and born of the Spirit await the moment of their resurrection into a "changed," "glorified," resurrected body.
Presuming they persevere until the end. Christ's own words...
Solo said:
Jesus teaches Nicodemus, and all those who are able to read and/or hear his words in the Word of God that all those who are born of the flesh and born of the Spirit are not condemned; however, all of those who have been born of the flesh, and are not born of the Spirit remained condemned.
Again, Jesus does NOT address HERE whether those who are born of the Spirit cannot subsequently fall and ALSO be condemned. He does elsewhere.
Carefully read what Jesus says:
He that believeth on him is not condemned, but he that believeth not is condemned already John 3:18
or
he that believeth not shall be damned. Mark 16:16b
Note, the present tense of "
believes". It doesn't say "if you
believed one time, long time ago".
One must
CONTINUE to believe in Him to remain "
not condemned". Thus, here is your mistake in interpretating John 3, leading to your mistaken theology.
Those who reject the Gospel are condemned. Whether they accept the Lord and LATER reject Him (do not persevere until the end) or whether they NEVER accept the Lord. Each are condemned...
Is THIS a new idea???
NO!
But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, [and] doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked [man] doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die. Ez 18:24
Even the Jews before Christ knew that one must persevere in the ways of the Lord UNTIL THE END to be "eternally secure". "Accepting Christ" does not guarantee you eternal security, since one can reject Christ later - and one no longer "believes on Christ" - and has rejected Him. Those who reject Christ are condemned. Doesn't matter WHEN that happens. Thus, the idea of "accepting Christ" does not, in of itself, provide "eternal security" from falling away and being condemned.
Regards