I would say for these eyes were not necessary....
And yet such fish normally have eyes, but no longer functional ones. What kind of "designer" would created fish in a cave with no light,and then outfit them with non-functional eyes? A Creator great enough to make a universe in which evolution happens would do this, but not the "space alien designer" of the IDers.
God would not have created creatures un-adaptable to their environment...
Populations. Creatures don't evolve. Populations do.
and yes birds meant to fly have them and those that were not do not...amazing and wonderful....
And inexplicable for creationism, but perfectly understandable if you accept it God's way.
Now I showed YOU that ostriches were never meant to fly
And yet they have vestigial wings. And an avian respiratory system which allows flight. They look exactly the way a bird would look if it evolved from flying to running.
and that they do not was not due to some PROCESS that made not fly...
That is an assumption. One that is at odds with the evidence.
their keel has never been shown to have become vestigial
They have no keel. It is completely gone. The sternum from which it would have formed, is retained, but the keel is completely absent.
Now YOU show ME evidence that Kakapos had a larger keel (and flew) that became vestigial
It, alone of all parrots, has a very small keel. It is large enough to let them flap and descend safely from large trees they climb, but they can't sustain flight. They do retain assymetrical flying feathers, which along with the keel and their flying relatives, shows that they did at one time, fly.
PLEASE just be honest and admit there is no evidence only conjecture
As you see, the evidence is quite clear. They are parrots who happened to find a land completely lacking in mammalian predators, and so had no need to fly. And over time, lost the ability to do much but controlled gliding. Genetic tests and anatomical data have shown it to be most closely related to the Kea, another New Zealand parrot, which still can fly. The vestigial keel and assymetric feathers show it to have descended from flying birds. Be honest; the evidence is unequivocal.
(and remember the argument from ignorance is a logic fallacy)