T
thessalonian
Guest
Mr. V. What does this all have to do with Hislops book of tripe and lies?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
MrVersatile48 said:I'm trying to keep it to Bible principles: that's exactly the point, because it's a very common RC trick to claim, "It's only Luther..Calvin..Billy Graham..Alex Hislop..etc who says these things" - as a subtle way of maligning Man's Maker's Manual, the Bible, as it's actually what God's Word says, in so many words, that those RC apologists deny & malign
For any readers who ain't seen the cartoon movie of Robin Hood, Sir Hiss is the snake character, who sings, while hypnotising the heroine:-
"Trus-s-s-s-st in me...
Jus-s-s-st in me..." :evil:
The whole point of what many evangelicals, ever since the Reformation, are saying is that God makes the rules..God calls the shots..& that anything vital for salvation & growth in Christ-like character is in the Bible
Also, like the Bereans in Acts 17:11, that anything any preacher says should be compared to the Bible by Christian hearers; we have a duty to do that
Here's a timely link to an article about that RC tactic of labeling evangelical groups as 'cults', when the true meaning of a cult is a group whose teachings patently disagree with the Bible over the Deity of Christ, the way of salvation & the supreme authority of the Word of God:-
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/003/15.27.html
RCs falsely call 'Sola Scriptura' a 'heresy' - just as they have falsely called the leaders of every revival since the Reformation 'heretics'
As has been repeatedly shown, & is the main thrust of The Two Babylons, ALL the distinctive RC dogma & practices are clearly unscriptural & their roots are painstakingly traced back to the forbidden Babylon pagan occult mystery religion dogma & practices
As I've often had to say, in my 4.5 years on various Christian discussion sites like this, we all should be aware that many more folk read the threads than post on them :roll:
It's very common indeed to see over 10 times as many views as there are posts - sometimes, over 20 times as many, yes?
That's why I try always to "K.I.S.S" - ("Keep It Simple, Stupid!" 8-)
Mind you, having graduated where the homiletics (=art of preaching) professor forever encouraged me to "strive for excellence" - by which he meant long words & multi-clause sentences - I 1st had to learn the hard way that I was going way over most folks' heads :o
In other words, I 1st had to learn to "M.I.S.S" - ('Make It Simple, Stupid!') ;-)
There are many, many details in The Two Babylons
Just as the media use the process of gradual info, I try my best to keep things bite-sized, so as not to over-face many readers & so as to give other folks a chance to contribute :
Also, if you click my profile & 'find all posts by...', you'll see that I'm by no means fixated on this subject, but do my best to provide as wide a variety of posts/threads as possible 8-)
Thinks: it's @ 2 weeks since I saw "Walk The Line"... :angel:
I'd best see if there's yet a movie review thread @ it, as today's posts kinda make it very timely.. :wink:
Yup: just 2 help us all walk the line for Lent...
& to prepare for Good Friday UK-wide walks of witness/open-airs...
http://www.christianforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=21237
& forevermore, DV...
http://www.christianforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=21264
A for the Oscars.... :P
cj said:The pope wears funny hats and sits on top of a basement full of earthly gold.
That's about the extent of the truth found in Rome.
cj
phatcatholic said:you do realize that there were many pagan gods that remind of Jesus, right? gods who become man, and are born of a virgin, and die for mankind are found throughout the pagan world. should we then use hislop's logic and assert that our beleifs about Jesus came from paganism too?
as for his scholarship (from this article):
- --the subtitle for Hislop’s book is “The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife.†but, referÂÂence works such as the Encyclopedia Britannica, The Americana, The Jewish Encyclopedia, The Catholic Encyclopedia, and The Worldbook Encyclopedia say nothing about Nimrod and Semiramis being husband and wife. they did not even live in the same century
--Semiramis is apparently the mother of Tammuz, but this was nowhere to be found either
--Hislop says that the “round†wafer used in the mass came from Egyptian paganism. For this he cites a statement in Wilkinson’s Ancient Egyptians (vol. 5, 353, 365) about the use of thin round cakes on their altars. however, Wilkinson’s work also said the Egyptians used oval and triangular cakes; folded cakes; cakes shaped like leaves, animals, and a crocodile’s head; and so on.
the manna from heaven was around also (Exo 16:14-15), maybe we should condemn that while we're at it....
--he says that Semiramis (or Isis) gave birth to Tammuz (or Horus) during the winter solstace, and that's the origin of the date when Christmas is celebrated. but, in Wilkinson's work, which he cites for this, the child born of Isis during that time was Harpocrates, not Tammuz, or Horus. so, Hislop basically just stick in the god that worked best for him.
--In another appeal to Wilkinson, Hislop says that a Lent of 40 days was observed in Egypt. But when we look up the reference, Wilkinson says Egyptian fasts “lasted from seven to forty-two days, and sometimes even a longer period: during which time they abstained entirely from animal food, from herbs and vegetables, and above all from the indulgence of the passions†(Wilkinson, Ancient Egyptians, vol. 1, 278). With as much credibility, we could say they fasted 7 days, 10 days, 12 days, or 42 days. Hislop’s claim appears to have validity only because he used partial information.
phatcatholic said:lets look at these links. the first one, which is entitled "SEMIRAMIS, QUEEN OF BABYLON" says in the very first sentence that Semiramis was married to Nimrod. i checked the resources used for this article to see how people keep coming up w/ this absurd notion. the first resource, ninevah.com, doesn't even have the article that was cited anymore, so i searched ninevah.com for "semiramis." only one result was provided, this one, and in it we read: "Ninus was the man who founded Ninus, in Aturia (Assyria) and his wife, Semiramis, was the woman who succeeded her husband...". Ninus was her husband, not Nimrod. again, Nimrod was of a completely different century. substituting "Nimrod" for "Ninus" is utterly arbitrary.D46 said:How about a little history of Semiramis and Tammuz?
http://www.ldolphin.org/semir.html
http://bupc.montana.com/whores/worsemi.html
just b/c some pagans have a "Queen of Heaven" and Catholics call Mary the "Queen of Heaven" that doesn't mean that our beliefs about Mary come from pagan origin. again -- and this is very important -- similarity does not prove causality. like i said in my earlier post (did u even read it?), pagans also have gods who become man, are born of a virgin, and die for mankind. maybe then we should discredit Jesus? no one has yet to respond to this argument. please do so.
should we quit worshipping Jesus then? afterall, Tammuz and Jesus are both called the "messiah." do you see now the implications of hislop's logic on all of christianity? we would have to dismiss the worship of Christ altogether if we ran with hislop. afterall:[quote:58ac0]December the 25th is the day celebrated for Tammuz’s birthday and that Roman Catholicism took this day and called it Jesus’ birthday. I found that Tammuz was called the messiah. All of this was found in secular history about one word, TAMMUZ, found only one time in the Bible, where God is showing Ezekiel the abominations that are in HIS HOUSE.
also, why don't we let the Church speak for herself regarding this holiday, since she created it and all. after researching all of the primary source material on this holiday (instead of relying on silly myths and wishful thinking) the author of the New Advent article on Christmas [ here ] says that "the same instinct which set Natalis Invicti [a solar cult] at the winter solstice will have sufficed, apart from deliberate adaptation or curious calculation, to set the Christian feast there too."
firstly, there is simply no connection to Tammuz.
secondly, even the connection w/ this other pagan holiday should give us no cause for concern. that is b/c there is simply nothing wrong with taking something pagan and transforming it with Christian beliefs, rendering it no longer pagan. in a sense, that is the duty of every Christian: to transform this pagan world that we live in. before you set about a rebuttal, don't forget Isaiah, who called one of the five cities that swears allegiance to the Lord the "City of the Sun" (Isa 19:18) and Malachai, who refers to the Lord as "the Sun of righteousness." solar imagery is often used in the bible as a way to describe the Lord. it simply makes sense that early Christians would build on this biblical precedent when determining the date to celebrate Christ's birth.
so two people have the same name.............big deal :roll: it proves nothing.[/quote:58ac0][quote:58ac0]Semiramis has had quite a few names throughout history. Today in most of the world, she is simply called Mary, via the Romish community.
Peter never being in Rome