I brought this up in the context that was light before there was a light source and mentioned that Origen noticed this in 2nd century AD. I got told that Origen wasn't a Jew as if that somehow invalidated the argument.
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2
Genesis 1:14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night,
and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years
We see from this verse that what you talk about was to be a sign.
If you go back to day 1, we see this statment.
And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
How can there be an evening and a morning if there is no sun that sets. Or, is it that when God said, "Let there be light", he wasn't talking about the sun which of course according to scripture was created after the earth... Please note, darkness was already... God didn't speak darkness into existence.
Regardless, according to scripture, it is evening and morning that makes up a day, not the sun raising and setting... Well, until day four when the sun raising and setting becomes a sign for a day, week, year and month.
Ironically, John has this to say...
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life,
and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
All through John's writing you see this contrast between light and darkness... and it has nothing to do with the sun.
If you can make this connection, congratulations, your starting to think like a Jew...